Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Beings as I am a student of Theology, the spiritual side of reality --- or rather --- the rule of the spiritual over the natural is what I get into.Interesting. I am always curious about how could science bore people. I do not understand.
Interesting. I am always curious about how could science bore people. I do not understand.
That's usually why it bores people.
It is mostly the responsibility of teachers or those who do the explanation.
While I think you make an excellent point, Juvenissun, I agree with Nathan on this one as well.It is mostly the responsibility of teachers or those who do the explanation.One can only do so much with those unwilling to learn.
While I think you make an excellent point, Juvenissun, I agree with Nathan on this one as well.
I used to read nothing but science books and magazines, including Popular Science and Scientific American.
But when I got saved, I suddenly lost all interest in science --- and I mean all.
I think that's one of the ways God changed me, and is evidence of my salvation.
Beings as I am a student of Theology, the spiritual side of reality --- or rather --- the rule of the spiritual over the natural is what I get into.
I think God switched a light off in my head, in order to turn another one on.
[That should make fstdt.]
I believe it's a reference to what we call the Lord's Table.Hey, AV, I can't remember where and when. Someone said to me that there are a few other (minor) religions in which the believers also "eat" their god. I always thought this concept (analogy) is unique to Christianity. Could you enlighten me more on that? I could not find that particular post. It was just a few days ago.
Could I do search on this forum?
I believe it's a reference to what we call the Lord's Table.
There are three major ways to look at it:
- TRANSUBSTANTIATION --- where the bread and wine literally become the flesh and blood of Jesus Christ.
- CONSUBSTANTIATION --- where the bread and wine spiritually become the flesh and blood of Jesus Christ.
- MEMORIALIZATION --- where the bread and wine [usually as grape juice] symbolize the flesh and blood of Jesus Christ.
So, you missed the "would be" elitist part. You know squat, actually, and the fact you think you do know is evidence of that.
The proof is in the failure to post a point in English, that we can have a look at. What exactly are you claiming?
I disagree. Present E does not equal eternal Mass times the speed of present light squared. really. Your math is baby math, remember??
Your so called geology is foolish unfounded fables as well.
Your so called geology is a foolish, unfounded fable as well.
Glad you think you are clever.
Why are you so afraid to debate? Can't you put a cohesive idea on the table, to be looked at?
no one is stoping you. go ahead.
I do know squat. But you know, it's helpful to find people who know less than me!
I do post in English, Dad. I just use technical terms in a technical discussion. I have made my point exceedingly clear. If you wish to call it absurd (after misrepresenting it) and then failing to correct your error, then I can do no more for you.
(At least I was man enough to admit my spelling mistake! I wish you were man enough to admit your mistakes. But I know what you really are. And perhaps your have to keep up your bluster because you secretly also realize that I know what you are.)
Be nice now. There is more to "dad" than bluster. Nobody but nobody on this board is seen to string hyperventilated adjectives the way he does.
He has his own version of E.B. White's advice that "if you dont know how to pronounce a word, say it loud!". His is, "Since i dont know what I am talking about, I will say it loud". AKA "gasbag".
People who jump on typos are the lowest form of internet debaters anyway.
Illogical grammar and word usage, now, that messes up the prose,so that you cant tell what they are saying. (Except that they are ignorant in English as well as the subject they are talking about)
You won't ever admit you don't understand simple algebra will you? You want to talk about someone trying to impress.
Hey, Dr. Grammar: you forgot a comma there and you have a disagreement in plural-singular nouns there.
This is what you should have written:
Geology in that sentence is singular, so "fable" should be as well.
Just in case you are keeping track. Busted again! Your hypocrisy is astounding! (Do you like having it thrown back in your face?)
I just have to be more clever than you. And that isn't very hard.
I'm clearly not afraid to debate, Dad. And since I've debated with you numerous times over the course of more than a year as well as numerous others on this board, I think you need to remember that it's a sin to bear false witness!
Wow, you appear to have a pretty weak grasp of logic, grammar, science, math and your own religious faith! That's just sad.
While I think you make an excellent point, Juvenissun, I agree with Nathan on this one as well.
I used to read nothing but science books and magazines, including Popular Science and Scientific American.
But when I got saved, I suddenly lost all interest in science --- and I mean all.
I think that's one of the ways God changed me, and is evidence of my salvation.
I do know squat. But you know, it's helpful to find people who know less than me!
I do post in English, Dad. I just use technical terms in a technical discussion. I have made my point exceedingly clear. If you wish to call it absurd (after misrepresenting it) and then failing to correct your error, then I can do no more for you.
(At least I was man enough to admit my spelling mistake! I wish you were man enough to admit your mistakes. But I know what you really are. And perhaps your have to keep up your bluster because you secretly also realize that I know what you are.)
It can't apply to spiritual eternal realities, at least when compared to present state realities. All is not equal!! You need to learn some advanced math, to cover that, and, have some inkling of what compares to what how and when, as well. Work on that, amidst all your boasting.You won't ever admit you don't understand simple algebra will you? You want to talk about someone trying to impress.
Geology in that sentence is singular, so "fable" should be as well.
May we all be as wise as you one day.I just have to be more clever than you. And that isn't very hard.
Debating consists, believe it or not, in more than a declaration of being more clever that the other poster!Wow, you appear to have a pretty weak grasp of logic, grammar, science, math and your own religious faith! That's just sad.[/quote]I'm clearly not afraid to debate, Dad. And since I've debated with you numerous times over the course of more than a year as well as numerous others on this board, I think you need to remember that it's a sin to bear false witness!
Be nice now. There is more to "dad" than bluster. Nobody but nobody on this board is seen to string hyperventilated adjectives the way he does.
He has his own version of E.B. White's advice that "if you dont know how to pronounce a word, say it loud!". His is, "Since i dont know what I am talking about, I will say it loud". AKA "gasbag".
People who jump on typos are the lowest form of internet debaters.
When grammar and word usage gets so bad you cant even figure out what they are trying to say, tho, that is different. That is fair game for mockery, especially since it reveals that they dont know what they are saying, or how to say it either one.
no one is stoping you. go ahead.Its good to know that you reject evidence even before its presented. how noble and educated of you.
pretending the universe was the same state in the far past, and buiding on that unsupportable foundation is a 'search for a predetermined "truth"'!Id say it is a good thing you are trying to do, up to a point.
I think you are going about it way wrong. A successful search requires intellectual honesty. I dont think you have that figured out yet. Im not saying that to be nasty, its just how it looks to me.
A search for a predetermined "truth" is a search that even faintly resembles science. Changing the meaning of words in your mind to make them fit isnt a good approach either.
As long as you do things that way you dont have a chance.
Good. It is a problem because the common sense (science) said that the growth of plant needs sunlight. But the sun is made after the plant (on earth).
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?