- Jan 7, 2024
- 7,738
- 997
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
No offence, but this is rubbish, your denying the fact that Genesis 1 is correct. WHY ?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
No, the ancient Egyptian and Babylonians did not get it right. Their concept of the world is not usable for today's global, mobile society. It could work for them, because they lived only in their specific area.
There is no fact that Genesis 1 is correct regarding cosmology - therefore, it cannot be denied.No offence, but this is rubbish, your denying the fact that Genesis 1 is correct. WHY ?
That's a neat trick, given that Antarctica is just under three and a half thousand miles across at its widest point.In this video Hubert states that he flew 6,000 miles over Antarctica & then came across new seas.
He flew OVER Antarctica?I didn't realize there were sea's 6,000 miles in, in Antarctica.
He flew OVER Antarctica?
He didn't smash into ice walls or end up in the "other worlds" that lie beyond it? Did he see the hordes of miliary men who are supposed to be guarding it?
That's a neat trick, given that Antarctica is just under three and a half thousand miles across at its widest point.
There is no need for such old resources and explorers from the 19th century who could be disoriented, misunderstood or see some melted ice.
This is what the Antarctica looks today from above:
Regarding "why" Genesis 1 is not literal
If someone made a video, it must be true.Only going by what the video says.
You finally got it right!To deny that Genesis 1 is not Literal is to deny God's word .
1. He doesn't say he flew over the iced walls.One he flew over the iced walls & two, this happened in 1928 whey before the Antarctic Treaty so there would have been nothing to stop him.
If you're saying that Genesis 1 is not literal. you are saying that it is not to be taken literally.To deny that Genesis 1 is not Literal is to deny God's word .
If someone made a video, it must be true.
If you're saying that Genesis 1 is not literal. you are saying that it is not to be taken literally.
If you are denying that it is literal,( which is the same thing) you are saying that it is not to be taken literally.
If you are denying that it is not literal, you are saying that it is literal.
So your own statement reads, "to say that Genesis 1 is literal is to deny God's word."
Why not? You claim that all astronauts who have been interviewed and personally made videos, and written books, about walking on the moon are lying.The video was done by Hubert himself in 1928. I suppose he's lying too
I know.What I did state is 'To deny that Genesis 1 is not Literal is to deny God's word'.
The "iced walls" are not too high if it was possible to fly over them easily with the most primitive first planes.One he flew over the iced walls & two, this happened in 1928 whey before the Antarctic Treaty so there would have been nothing to stop him.
No, God did not write Genesis 1 and did not state "this is literal". Therefore, no "amen" to your claims.To deny that Genesis 1 is not Literal is to deny God's word .
Why not? You claim that all astronauts who have been interviewed and personally made videos, and written books, about walking on the moon are lying.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?