Yes, grown women go through that too. What I am saying is that those complications are
even more likely to occur in young girls, because their bodies are greatly underdeveloped. Their pelvises and hips are too narrow and their bodies are smaller, which means more and more nutrients being drained by the fetus. And 10-12-year-old girls
DO NOT have the physical or mental maturity to deal with something like pregnancy and childbirth. Just because a girl is biologically capable of carrying and birthing a child doesn't mean they
SHOULD. Children should not be forced to have children. I would have not wanted to carry a child if I was raped and got pregnant at 11. I was still watching Disney Channel and Cartoon Network at 11. I was still playing with Barbie dolls and action figures at 11. Being forced to go through 9 months of pregnancy and then 18-32+ hours of labor would have been a nightmare. A 10-year-old child can't legally adopt a child, so why should a 10-year-old child be forced to give birth? All because of some doctrine that is not even in the Bible? The Bible never condemns abortion. The Bible never addresses fetuses like they are people with souls.
And where, exactly, are they allowing people to kill their babies 28 days after they're born? Because this sounds like fiction and conspiracy theory nonsense to me. What government in their right mind would allow people to murder already-born children? I found these articles here because I don't trust the GOP and right-wing sites to be truthful about this and not totally misunderstand and twist this. Apparently, the bill is meant to protect parents whose babies were stillborn or died shortly after birth due to pregnancy-related issues from being legally punished.
PolitiFact | No, this California bill wouldn't allow mothers to kill their children after they're born
Fact Check-California reproductive health bill leads to misinterpretation online | Reuters
California bill doesn’t allow killing babies 7 days after birth | abc10.com
It's worth noting, too, that the majority of abortions are performed in the first trimester, while late-term abortions are far less common at about 7%. And most late-term abortions are for medical emergencies (e.g. incomplete miscarriage, fetal deformity or defect that would give it little or no quality of life, and health complications that put the mother's life at risk).
Abortion By The Numbers (forbes.com)
