• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Abortion scenario

In A Perfect World

Well-Known Member
Jun 19, 2005
1,639
29
38
CT
✟32,022.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
A retarded woman gets raped and happens to defy not only infertility odds, but also plan menstrual cycle odds and ends up pregnant.

She lives in an assisted housing facility and barely grasps the concept of pregnancy. There is a great chance that the baby if born will end up retarded as she.

Is abortion an acceptable in this siutation? Who would otherwise raise the baby? Is it fair to subject a retarded woman to the burden of pregnancy?
 

NothingButTheBlood

Well-Known Member
Feb 27, 2005
3,454
130
✟4,508.00
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Private
A retarded woman gets raped and happens to defy not only infertility odds, but also plan menstrual cycle odds and ends up pregnant.

I did not know retarded women don't have regular menstrual cycles and are infertile as norm.

She lives in an assisted housing facility and barely grasps the concept of pregnancy. There is a great chance that the baby if born will end up retarded as she.

I also didn't know most retarded parents have retarded children.

Is abortion an acceptable in this siutation? Who would otherwise raise the baby? Is it fair to subject a retarded woman to the burden of pregnancy?

Anyone who may be willing to adopt could raise the child. Depending how bad she was no it probobly wouldn't be "fair" to have her go through pregnancy. This would be an instance where abortion would be a viable option. The chances she would have any subsequent ones is slim as well.
 
Upvote 0

jayem

Naturalist
Jun 24, 2003
15,429
7,164
74
St. Louis, MO.
✟426,066.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Profound retardation, where a patient cannot comprehend and cooperate with the monitoring and treatment that pregnancy and delivery requires is certainly a valid medical indication for termination.

And BTW, she should be transferred to a facility where there is adequate supervision so that patients aren't assaulted.
 
Upvote 0

e=mv^2

Well-Known Member
Jun 22, 2004
1,397
92
51
✟32,123.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
Why do people totally ignore adoption?

You are effectively saying:

Is it ok to kill a potentially disabled baby based on the fact that it was unfortunate enough to have been fathered by a rapist and might in the natural course of events cause pain to a disabled person?

No. It is not ok.
 
Upvote 0

Arkanin

Human
Oct 13, 2003
5,592
287
42
Texas
✟7,151.00
Faith
Anglican
Politics
US-Libertarian
Why do people totally ignore adoption?


So, let's say a famous pianist is in desperate need of something your body has because of an exotic medical condition, but the only way to save his life is to hook him up to you for nine months, therefore imposing major debilitation on your life. Are you fundamentally obligated to do so for this person?

This is the reason few Christians can honestly say that abortion is truly unjustifiable in all cases.
 
Upvote 0

e=mv^2

Well-Known Member
Jun 22, 2004
1,397
92
51
✟32,123.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian

So, let's say a famous pianist is in desperate need of something your body has because of an exotic medical condition, but the only way to save his life is to hook him up to you for nine months, therefore imposing major debilitation on your life. Are you fundamentally obligated to do so for this person?
So let's create a totally fictional and non existant scenario in order to justify the murder of 100's of thousands of babies. Has your scanario ever happened in the history of mankind? Ever?

This pianist:

1) has lived for a while and has experienced the world in a meaningful way.
2) was actually born

The baby:
1) Is not a disease
2) Has never had a chance to experience the world
3) Is innocent
 
Upvote 0

NothingButTheBlood

Well-Known Member
Feb 27, 2005
3,454
130
✟4,508.00
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Private
Arkanin said:
[/size][/color][/font]So, let's say a famous pianist is in desperate need of something your body has because of an exotic medical condition, but the only way to save his life is to hook him up to you for nine months, therefore imposing major debilitation on your life. Are you fundamentally obligated to do so for this person?

This is the reason few Christians can honestly say that abortion is truly unjustifiable in all cases.

Let's say it was anybody. If I was told this person could live by being hooked up to me for nine months I may not have to help them but I would like to think I would. What is nine months to say a life?
 
Upvote 0

Idioteque

Active Member
Aug 26, 2005
74
5
42
✟219.00
Faith
Baptist
Arkanin said:
[/size][/color][/font]So, let's say a famous pianist is in desperate need of something your body has because of an exotic medical condition, but the only way to save his life is to hook him up to you for nine months, therefore imposing major debilitation on your life. Are you fundamentally obligated to do so for this person?

This is the reason few Christians can honestly say that abortion is truly unjustifiable in all cases.

You're not seriously comparing a mother-child relationship/responsibility to a random citizen/pianist one.......... are you??
 
Upvote 0

jayem

Naturalist
Jun 24, 2003
15,429
7,164
74
St. Louis, MO.
✟426,066.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
e=mv^2 said:
Is it ok to kill a potentially disabled baby based on the fact that it was unfortunate enough to have been fathered by a rapist and might in the natural course of events cause pain to a disabled person?

No. It is not ok.


It may not be that simple. We don't know in this scenario how severe is her mental disability. If it is very profound, this could be a contraindication to pregnancy. Some retarded persons are combative, and have to be restrained or sedated just to be examined. Some patients require sedative medication on a regular basis to keep them from hurting themselves or others. This itself poses some risk to the pregnancy. An uncommunicative patient won't report symptoms, and theoretically, significant complications might not be diagnosed until they have dangerously progressed. Delivery may have to be by C-section, since she may not be able to cooperate adequately for a vaginal delivery. I'm not saying any of these are insurmountable problems, but very severe retardation could certainly present enough technical risk that abortion may be the safer option. Like any other medically complicated pregnancy, it's a matter of medical judgement, that must be made on a case-by-case basis. I'll agree with you that it is tragic and undesireable to terminate a pregnancy, but sometimes it may be necessary--even life-saving for the mother. You can't be rigidly black or white about this.
 
Upvote 0

Arkanin

Human
Oct 13, 2003
5,592
287
42
Texas
✟7,151.00
Faith
Anglican
Politics
US-Libertarian


So let's create a totally fictional and non existant scenario in order to justify the murder of 100's of thousands of babies. Has your scanario ever happened in the history of mankind? Ever?


From a philosophical perspective, it doesn't matter. Ask any Christian here with philosophical training.

Let's say it was anybody. If I was told this person could live by being hooked up to me for nine months I may not have to help them but I would like to think I would. What is nine months to say a life?

Let's not ask 'is abortion good?', but 'should abortion be legal in at least some situation?' We need to decide whether our declining such a role would be ethical or not.
 
Upvote 0

.Mikha'el.

7x13=28
Christian Forums Staff
Supervisor
Site Supporter
May 22, 2004
34,863
6,955
41
British Columbia
✟1,391,685.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Single
In A Perfect World said:
A retarded woman gets raped and happens to defy not only infertility odds, but also plan menstrual cycle odds and ends up pregnant.

She lives in an assisted housing facility and barely grasps the concept of pregnancy. There is a great chance that the baby if born will end up retarded as she.

Is abortion an acceptable in this siutation? Who would otherwise raise the baby? Is it fair to subject a retarded woman to the burden of pregnancy?

Rape is one the few situations where I consider an abortion acceptable.
 
Upvote 0

Archivist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 5, 2004
17,332
6,439
Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
✟639,696.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Idioteque said:
Ya know, I wanna try a trendy heroin habit.

My body, my choice, right?

Heroin is illegal, at least it was the last time I checked.

Abortion is not.
 
Upvote 0