Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Show me photosynthesis in progress on Day Three of the Creation.Talk about higher standard, creation cant even meet the standard of elementary school science. it fails at things like the solar system and photosynthesis.
Show me photosynthesis in progress on Day Three of the Creation.
This post is an example of why I don't think Creationism should be taught in the public school system.
I didn't say war, I said the defeat of the Spanish Armada. Science today can no more validate the Spanish Armada, than it can Jesus walking on water; so the question, "How do you suppose science should investigate the claim that 2000 years ago, somebody walked on water?" cannot be ascertained within the realm of science.
I didn't say war, I said the defeat of the Spanish Armada. Science today can no more validate the Spanish Armada, than it can Jesus walking on water; so the question, "How do you suppose science should investigate the claim that 2000 years ago, somebody walked on water?" cannot be ascertained within the realm of science.
You'd have to show me that these sunken ships were taking part in a raid on England with the intent of invading and conquering England, as Wikipedia states. In addition, you'll have to show me that anything written down wasn't written after-the-fact, and that any document that was signed was indeed, signed by the person whose name appears on (or above) the writing.[serious];49365957 said:what about the sunken ships found? IIRC we've found wrecks from the battle.
You'd have to show me that these sunken ships were taking part in a raid on England with the intent of invading and conquering England, as Wikipedia states. In addition, you'll have to show me that anything written down wasn't written after-the-fact, and that any document that was signed was indeed, signed by the person whose name appears on (or above) the writing.
(I hope you see where I'm going with this.)
Unless and until you do so --- science can't validate the defeat of the Spanish Armada --- let alone show that it ever existed.
I can't --- but I use the same thing in my approach as [serious] (and probably you) do in your approach to the Spanish Armada --- faith.Yes! Now do the same with the Bible!
No, it's not, but your (and my) belief in it is.Sorry but science is not based on faith!
No, it's not, but your (and my) belief in it is.
I gotta admit --- I sure don't --- do you?Frankly AV; Do you know the satisfaction a scientist feels even when he refutes his own theories?
you look for corroborating contemporary sources. treaties (there must be official documents ending the war), journals/diaries (multiple first-hand accounts of the event that date the same from soldiers, officials, or public), whatever forms of media existed at the time would also record this event. multiple, independant, contemporary sources.You'd have to show me that these sunken ships were taking part in a raid on England with the intent of invading and conquering England, as Wikipedia states. In addition, you'll have to show me that anything written down wasn't written after-the-fact, and that any document that was signed was indeed, signed by the person whose name appears on (or above) the writing.
(I hope you see where I'm going with this.)
Unless and until you do so --- science can't validate the defeat of the Spanish Armada --- let alone show that it ever existed.
oh im sorry, energy doesnt exist yet cause there's no 2nd law right?Show me photosynthesis in progress on Day Three of the Creation.
How can it fail at photosynthesis, if photosynthesis doesn't even exist yet?
This post is an example of why I don't think Creationism should be taught in the public school system.
Wrong --- as I pointed out before --- contrary to the Big Expansion Model, Genesis 1 makes it clear that the amount of mass/energy in the universe started out at zero, then increased to its current level over a period of six days.oh im sorry, energy doesnt exist yet cause there's no 2nd law right?
I've been saying that for years.like i said, biblical creation bears no resemblence at all to the universe or how it works.
Yet after alienating yourselves from Genesis 1, you guys go on to say you don't know how it happened. In other words, I hear this:so dont blame us for thinking it's not the way it happened.
I've been saying that for years as well, and my Mariana Trench thread confirms it.i put more faith in the work of God than the word.
Correct.God's work passed through no human hand.
Incorrect --- God dictated (spake) the universe into existence, and in an order that pwns science and evolution.There was no dictating, no typos, no errors, no editing.
It is a universe whose sustenance was abandoned by God and is currently "rotting away" - (entropy). God still maintains a quantum [no pun intended] hold on the universe, according to Colossians 1, but when the time comes, He will release that hold and the universe will, according to Peter, "melt with fervent heat".This universe around us is the direct hand of God.
It takes more faith to believe in Evolution than it does Creation.
Yet another example of how creationists cripple and demean their own "faith," in their zeal to demean a biological process most admit actually works.
No, it's not, but your (and my) belief in it is.
QV please.Tut, tut, AV. Still touting this line? I'm still waiting for an answer to:
http://christianforums.com/showpost.php?p=49472005&postcount=65
LOL --- I gotta admit, Cabal --- my blood started boiling when I read this, but by the time I finished reading the rest of your post, I almost fell out of my chair laughing. That trifecta part was good! Anyway, back to this ---So let's see what we have. You expect every person (not even just the trained scientists) in the opposing camp to independently verify every fact they cite, all the while shrugging off the notion of evidence for your viewpoint ("because that's the way Goddidit!" TM). Oh, but entropy REALLY IS because of the fall!
Romans 10:17 said:So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?