Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Sorry, but that is not the case. You should read your articles rather than just reading the titles.not sure if you are referring to darwins tree of life, but this has recently been refuted:
New Scientist says Darwin was wrong
http://phys.org/news152274071.html#jCp
texscience.org – Blog
Evolution: Charles Darwin was wrong about the tree of life
every issue I have addressed, name one I havent'
not sure if you are referring to darwins tree of life, but this has recently been refuted:
New Scientist says Darwin was wrong
http://phys.org/news152274071.html#jCp
texscience.org – Blog
Evolution: Charles Darwin was wrong about the tree of life
again my reply to this would be very similar to this post:
A thread on evolution
Not a shocker.
You know that sahelanthropus contains human like traits. If you had a skull of a human and a skull of a crocodile, you would not hesitate to say "yes sahelanthropus is more like a human than a crocodile. Because it shares traits with a human skull, as well as a chimp skull.
Which leads us to my prior post.
If hypothetically, the fossil succession, that is to say, fossils present through geologic time, if this succession of fossils matched genetic relatedness or "genetic similarity" as you put it, what would it mean to you? And do you know what I mean what I ask this question? If you would like an example, i can give an example.
Yes and I feel dumber for having watched it.
observation is a critical aspect of hard scientific theory. If you have no observation you do not have the ability to test any hypothesis. Evolution is untested because there is no observation of macro evolution. So to claim it is science, is wrong. It absolutely cannot be science.Laws of science? Show me theese laws.
Ok.observation is a critical aspect of hard scientific theory. If you have no observation you do not have the ability to test any hypothesis. Evolution is untested because there is no observation of macro evolution. So to claim it is science, is wrong. It absolutely cannot be science.
did you watch it from beginning to end? all of it? I didn't think so.
observation is a critical aspect of hard scientific theory. If you have no observation you do not have the ability to test any hypothesis. Evolution is untested because there is no observation of macro evolution. So to claim it is science, is wrong. It absolutely cannot be science.
So you accept that?
so are you deceiving yourself, just like the atheist proclaimed in the video? your replies are the exact same as theirs were.Yes, as I have told you repeatedly. Is this supposed to be some magic infused video that is supposed to convert me on the spot?
So do you believe the book of life ( our dna) could come from nothing? any more than a full color page book could fall from heaven (out of thin air), page numbers falling out of the sky, red ink, blue ink forming itself into coherent words, and pictures? both are impossible yes? if so, then the only other option is that they did not come.from nothing, and I present the only logical explanation of what that thing is that created dna, God. It's not an appeal to silence because this is truly the only explanation that actually works. if there were other explanations than one may say this is an argument from silence but neither you nor myself have another explaination.Yes, as I have told you repeatedly. Is this supposed to be some magic infused video that is supposed to convert me on the spot?
so are you deceiving yourself, just like the atheist proclaimed in the video? your replies are the exact same as theirs were.
So do you believe the book of life ( our dna) could come from nothing?
both are impossible yes?
Not into "not believing in a deity". I've repeatedly tried to delude myself into believing in and afterlife and the like, though. Thus far, I have failed. Besides, willfully lying to oneself never results in any belief change, since one is always aware of doing it.so are you deceiving yourself, just like the atheist proclaimed in the video?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?