• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

A simple question

Status
Not open for further replies.

shernren

you are not reading this.
Feb 17, 2005
8,463
515
38
Shah Alam, Selangor
Visit site
✟33,881.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
In Relationship
I didn't go into too much detail here. First and foremost there are 4 major groups of life that were created at different times. Plants, sea life, animals on dry land and then humans. The first 3 groups then contain different kinds within them. I agree that the text doesn't seem to suggest that each animal was created one after the other, but rather all animals were created simultaneously within each successive group (the creative process here being a mystery). What is clear here is that God did not create one creature that grew into a multitude - He created the multitudes all at once.

Actually, there were:
Land plants
Marine animals
Airborne animals
Land animals
Humans

Now, there is a very important omission from this list: seaweed. And marine plankton are one of the most important players in the global ecology by sheer biomass and also their role as carbon sinks. I don't see a good reason for God to have left it out. I mean, God found room to describe relativistic 4-D stretching (or at least, the creation science people would have us think "stretching out the firmaments" is codespeak for spacetime warping), and He couldn't have left a note that the kelp were His idea? ;) another small annoyance. :)
 
Upvote 0

Sojourner<><

Incoherent Freedom Fighter
Mar 23, 2005
1,606
14
45
✟24,385.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
shernren said:
Actually, there were:
Land plants
Marine animals
Airborne animals
Land animals
Humans

My mistake. Birds would be part of group 2 along with sea life.

Now, there is a very important omission from this list: seaweed. And marine plankton are one of the most important players in the global ecology by sheer biomass and also their role as carbon sinks. I don't see a good reason for God to have left it out. I mean, God found room to describe relativistic 4-D stretching (or at least, the creation science people would have us think "stretching out the firmaments" is codespeak for spacetime warping), and He couldn't have left a note that the kelp were His idea? ;) another small annoyance. :)

Not really. How is it that the plants God created on the third day were limited to dry land?
 
Upvote 0

GenemZ

Well-Known Member
Mar 1, 2004
22,169
1,377
75
Atlanta
✟109,031.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Shernren? Please do not address me, then afterwards quote someone else as if I said it? Thank you.

shernren said:
Genez, what I'm hearing is that every time a creation was / is scrapped there is a massive meltdown, right? And that the most recent time this happened was 6000 years ago. Well a destructive event of the kind you postulated should cause the resetting of most clocks that give the earth an old age. Evidently, though, it hasn't.

You are hearing wong. When God is through with the purpose this planet was created for... for testing the hearts of angels and men. Then this planet will be eliminated by a nuclear thermal breakdown where the elements will melt. If God used that procedure all along, there would be no fossil remains. For all the elements (chemical elements) will be melted down.

The following is a prophectic glimpse into a prehistoric destruction of what appears to be the last creation just before this one replaced it. Jeremiah was seeing though the prophetic eye what God had done in the past, to tell the rebellious Jews that God is more than able to destroy the entire world, and not just their small nation.

Yet, Jeremiah utilizes the same Hebrew words shown to Moses, when Moses recorded Genesis 1:2. Those words reveal judgement and utter destruction of all life. God caused a massive earthquake that buried all life on the earth's surface, and removed all light.

Removing all light produces just the opposite of melting. You remove all light and you have absolute freezing. Nothing could survive. For, God had to bring back light in Genesis 1. The world had been frozen under a giant icepack. For it says in the Hebrew, that the Spirit was "hovering" over the raging waters which covered the entire surface of the world. The word "hovering" is the same Hebrew word used to describe a mother hen sitting over her eggs as to warm them.

Jeremiah 4:23-28
" I looked at the earth,
and it was formless and empty;
(same Hebrew as Genesis 1:2)
and at the heavens,
and their light was gone.



24 I looked at the mountains,
and they were quaking;
all the hills were swaying.


25 I looked, and there were no people;
every bird in the sky had flown away.


26 I looked, and the fruitful land was a desert;
all its towns lay in ruins
before the LORD, before his fierce anger.


27 This is what the LORD says:
"The whole land will be ruined,
though I will not destroy it completely.
28 Therefore the earth will mourn
and the heavens above grow dark,
because I have spoken and will not relent,
I have decided and will not turn back."







There is no indication in Scripture that microorganisms are responsible for skin diseases. You get exactly the opposite impression from reading the matter of fact accounts of sterilization and cleansing rituals in the Torah. So when a child has eczema do you send him to the pastor or to the doctor? The Bible was never meant to make scientific statements.

But it was meant to make statements that science would later prove to be true, and man had no way of knowing before science discovered why.

In other words, God in his omnsicience gave certain commands that the writers could not know the reason for them. But, being faithful to them produced results that good science today would have done the same.

The male child was to be circumsized on the eight day. Science has found out that on the eight day, for some reason the blood clotting factor in the male human body skyrockets for a time. Also, Jews were commanded not to eat meats that we now know are agents to carry hepatitis and trichinosis. Other peoples around the Jews did not have such practices.

God knew science. God created the scientific mind to reveal this. And, to amaze the scientists with God's ability to create down to the atomic level. Each atom God had to personally create Himself. He did not send out a committee of angels to do this work.

Grace and peace, GeneZ
 
Upvote 0

GenemZ

Well-Known Member
Mar 1, 2004
22,169
1,377
75
Atlanta
✟109,031.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
gluadys said:
Are you saying that Isaiah and Peter are describing two separate events?

Yes....
Colossians 1:16-17 niv
"For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together (cohere, are held together)."

The very atomic structure of all creation is being held together by the Lord! It it were not held together it would release explosive energy. This planet will have a nuclear breakdown and all the elements will melt away.

2 Peter 3:10 niv
"But the day of the Lord will come like a thief. The heavens will disappear with a roar; the elements will be destroyed by fire, and the earth and everything in it will be laid bare."

2 Peter 3:11-13 niv
"Since everything will be destroyed in this way, what kind of people ought you to be? You ought to live holy and godly lives as you look forward to the day of God and speed its coming.That day will bring about the destruction of the heavens by fire, and the elements will melt in the heat. But in keeping with his promise we are looking forward to a new heaven and a new earth, the home of righteousness."

The Home of Righteousness will be a new planet. The one we are now on is not the Home of Righteousness. This one is for testing to see who are the righteous.



Why would the new perfect environment described by Isaiah be scrapped in favour of a new planet?

Because it will be existing to prove a point. That perfect environment is not the answer to man's problems (as liberals try to tell us, it is). There will be perfect environment where nothing can harm you. No disease. Yet? Millions will still hate the Lord!

Perfect environment will exist to reveal that the reason men reject God is not because of their personal circumstances. It is because certain men hate anyone having authority over them, unless that authority is evil.

Revelation 20:7-9 niv
"When the thousand years are over, Satan will be released from his prison and will go out to deceive the nations in the four corners of the earth—Gog and Magog—to gather them for battle. In number they are like the sand on the seashore. They marched across the breadth of the earth and surrounded the camp of God's people, the city he loves. But fire came down from heaven and devoured them."

That world Satan will be released into is the world Isaiah descibed as a new heavens and earth. The lion will graze with the lamb. Buried under that ground will be the bones of lions who had carnivore teeth!

No one will fail to live to be a 1000 unless they faced capital punishment. The Lord will keep all crime away from the world. Anyone who commits evil will be executed.

Revelation 2:27 niv
'He will rule them with an iron scepter; he will dash them to pieces like pottery' "

After a while evil learns to be self controlled. That is why at the end of the thousand years Satan has no trouble finding recruits.

Perfect environment saves no one in itself. Matter of fact. Some of the most righteous people lived during times of great injustice and disorder. Environment is not the excuse. God will end all excuses by having the Millennial Reign of Christ. No one can blame God for making things a certain way as their justification for rejecting him. There will be perfect health during that 1000 years. Perfect economy.

Isaiah 65:20 niv
"Never again will there be in it an infant who lives but a few days, or an old man who does not live out his years; he who dies at a hundred will be thought a mere youth; he who fails to reach a hundred will be considered accursed."

So the past destruction which left the earth tohu and bohu took place on this earth, the same one we live on today? We are not on a different planet than the one that was destroyed?

Same planet. Different creation on its surface. That is why we find the different ages preserved in the strata. God had a purpose for each age. Those ages involved the judgement and evaluation of angels, not men created in God's image.

Man was created as he was to (in part) resolve the angelic conflict which was prehistoric. Men today either reflect the nature of elect angels, or fallen angels. Fallen angels can see their own condemnation in the way evil men act towards the righteous.

They can see why they need to be quarantined by God away from the righteous, if the righteous are ever to be truly free and happy. That evil and good can not co-exist forever.

The Lake of Fire was not created for man.

Matthew 25:41 niv
"Then he will say to those on his left, 'Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels."

It was originally created for Satan and his angels. The Lake of Fire was created before man was created. It was not created for man. Man was put on earth to teach the elect angels why God must severly judge their old friends... the fallen angels. To show why the fallen angels can not be allowed back to where they once were with God. Unbelievers and evil men throughout history make the need for God's severe judgement self evident.

Just look what happens when child molesters are allowed to live because well intentioned men can not put themselves up to being severe enough in judging them as to protect the righteous. God would have had them executed in a heart beat. They lost their right to live when they entered into such evil.

But, men allow them to live. God is showing what will happen if he does not judge the evil. They must be isolated forever. Isolation is torment. The fire is only to keep them preoccupied with their own pain so they will have no time for another evil thought towards God. God will not tolerate any more lies towards himself once his judgement is final.

Grace and peace, GeneZ
 
Upvote 0

gluadys

Legend
Mar 2, 2004
12,958
682
Toronto
✟39,020.00
Faith
Protestant
Politics
CA-NDP
genez said:
Same planet. Different creation on its surface. That is why we find the different ages preserved in the strata. God had a purpose for each age. Those ages involved the judgement and evaluation of angels, not men created in God's image.

Man was created as he was to (in part) resolve the angelic conflict which was prehistoric. Men today either reflect the nature of elect angels, or fallen angels. Fallen angels can see their own condemnation in the way evil men act towards the righteous.

Intruiguing, to say the least.

Two more questions.

Are you saying that in the previous ages there were no humans? Humans are unique to the present (and future) creations?

Also, you seem to be implying that the earth was subject to destruction more than once prior to the creation of humanity. Is that correct?

And that the geological strata are remnants of each of the former creations. Is that correct? (ok. that makes three questions).
 
Upvote 0

GenemZ

Well-Known Member
Mar 1, 2004
22,169
1,377
75
Atlanta
✟109,031.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
gluadys said:
Intruiguing, to say the least.

Two more questions.

Are you saying that in the previous ages there were no humans? Humans are unique to the present (and future) creations?

There was a higher form of creation referred to as "people" corporately, but were not created in God's image.


Also, you seem to be implying that the earth was subject to destruction more than once prior to the creation of humanity. Is that correct

And that the geological strata are remnants of each of the former creations. Is that correct? (ok. that makes three questions).

Correct! Ancient Jewish scholars saw from the Scriptures that there were other worlds that preceded this one. But, they were not privy to the fossil evidence. They did not know what it could mean.

From:
http://www.creationdays.dk/withoutformandvoid/1.html

"According to the Revised Edition of Chambers's Encyclopedia published in 1860, under the heading "Genesis" the view which was then being popularized by Buckland and others to the effect that an interval of unknown duration was to be interposed between Gen. 1. 1 and 1. 2 was already to be found in the Midrash.


In his great work, The Legends of the Jews, Louis Ginsberg has put into continuous narrative a precis of their legends, as far as possible in the original phrases and terms. In Volume 1 which covers the period from the Creation to Jacob, he has this excerpt on Genesis 1:4







"Nor is this world inhabited by man the first of things earthly created by God. He made several other worlds before ours, but He destroyed them all, because He was pleased with none until He created ours."





This whole notion (as claimed by YEC's) that the GAP theory was created out of the need to counter the threat imposed by Darwin's theory, is simply dead wrong. The GAP theory was alive and well long before Darwin was even born. Why? Because it is revealed in the Original Language of Scripture! That's why!

The fossil evidence does not disprove Scripture! It helps clarify what it was pointing to all the while! That is why God created scientists! To help clarify Scripture, not fight it.

"Nor is this world inhabited by man the first of things earthly created by God. He made several other worlds before ours, but He destroyed them all, because He was pleased with none until He created ours."

Ancient Jewish scholars were seeing this a long time ago. They just had no idea what those other worlds were really like. With one acception. Jeremiah 4:23-26....

23 I looked at the earth,
and it was formless and empty; < (Hebrew of
Genesis 1:2, exactly!)
and at the heavens,
and their light was gone.



24 I looked at the mountains,
and they were quaking;
all the hills were swaying.


25 I looked, and there were no people;
every bird in the sky had flown away.
26 I looked, and the fruitful land was a desert;
all its towns lay in ruins
before the LORD, before his fierce anger."


Grace and peace, GeneZ







 
Upvote 0

Micaiah

Well-Known Member
Dec 29, 2002
2,444
37
62
Western Australia
Visit site
✟2,837.00
Faith
Christian
This whole notion (as claimed by YEC's) that the GAP theory was created out of the need to counter the threat imposed by Darwin's theory, is simply dead wrong. The GAP theory was alive and well long before Darwin was even born. Why? Because it is revealed in the Original Language of Scripture! That's why!

I've never noticed any passages in Scipture that talk about God using evolution. Am I missing a book from my Bible?
 
Upvote 0

GenemZ

Well-Known Member
Mar 1, 2004
22,169
1,377
75
Atlanta
✟109,031.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Micaiah said:
I've never noticed any passages in Scipture that talk about God using evolution. Am I missing a book from my Bible?

No one is talking about evolution. If anything, it refutes it.


Hello? :sleep: :preach:

;) The GAP understanding explains why we find fossils of complete eras of creation, yet they can not come up with those illusive "missing links.' For a creation was ended abruptly, and replaced over it with another. No evolution. No missing links!

Just like it will happen once more!

Remember how God cursed the serpent and made it instantly transformed into crawling on its belly? That was not evolution! That was God creating a new species instantly! And God does have that power to do that! New creations replace older. Once more God will do this. What we see now will be changed over night. Not taking thousands of years! But, in a twinkle of an eye this present creation will be gone, and a new one in its place.

Isaiah 11:6-9 niv

" The wolf will live with the lamb,
the leopard will lie down with the goat,
the calf and the lion and the yearling together;
and a little child will lead them.



The cow will feed with the bear,
their young will lie down together,
and the lion will eat straw like the ox.


The infant will play near the hole of the cobra,
and the young child put his hand into the viper's nest.

They will neither harm nor destroy
on all my holy mountain,
for the earth will be full of the knowledge of the LORD
as the waters cover the sea. "


That will be a new creation! Instantly before us. No evolution!

Likewise, God replaced older creations with newer ones. It just so happens that we are now getting to the end of the road of God's plan for this earth. There will be one more recreation before it is melted away and replaced with an earth that will never be judged. The "Home of Righteousness."

2 Peter 3:10-13 niv

"But the day of the Lord will come like a thief. The heavens will disappear with a roar; the elements will be destroyed by fire, and the earth and everything in it will be laid bare.

Since everything will be destroyed in this way, what kind of people ought you to be? You ought to live holy and godly lives as you look forward to the day of God and speed its coming.That day will bring about the destruction of the heavens by fire, and the elements will melt in the heat. But in keeping with his promise we are looking forward to a new heaven and a new earth, the home of righteousness."

May I say? Grace and peace? :priest:


Gene Z

 
Upvote 0
C

Critias

Guest
If one were to take the Author's intended meaning, the gap theory would be out the window as well. Interpreting the Bible with the intention to understand it how the author intended, there is no other way to take the Bible saying this world we are in is the first creation, not the second, third, fourth or fifth.

One must assert their own meaning into the text to suggest that there was a creation created over the original creation whereas this is still the first creation, recreated.

The world was destroyed only once by the flood, as the Bible states.

Interpret however you wish, it is your choice to do so. If one truly cares to learn, to be trained in righteousness, then one will search, learn, understand, and believe the Bible in how it is presented by accepting the Author's meaning and not our own.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sojourner<><
Upvote 0

gluadys

Legend
Mar 2, 2004
12,958
682
Toronto
✟39,020.00
Faith
Protestant
Politics
CA-NDP
I feel like Alice in Wonderland. Every statement raises new questions.

genez said:
There was a higher form of creation referred to as "people" corporately, but were not created in God's image.

Does gap theory make any estimate as to how many creations there were on earth before the present one?

Does it suggest that such human-like creatures existed in all these creations or only the one prior to the present one?

How does gap theory explain the existence of hominid species which overlap with that of our own species. We know of at least three other human species that lived on earth at the same time as early Homo sapiens.

Are they holdovers from an earlier creation, or did God make them all as part of the present creation?


In his great work, The Legends of the Jews, Louis Ginsberg has put into continuous narrative a precis of their legends, as far as possible in the original phrases and terms. In Volume 1 which covers the period from the Creation to Jacob, he has this excerpt on Genesis 1:4


Good title. Describes this line of thinking quite accurately IMO.


"Nor is this world inhabited by man the first of things earthly created by God. He made several other worlds before ours, but He destroyed them all, because He was pleased with none until He created ours."


So God was like Edison? Had to try and try again through many failures before he got it right. I don't know about Jewish scholars, but I know a lot of Christians would have a problem with that view of God's original incompetence.

So, is it the view of gap theorists that the older creations were a sort of apprenticeship in learning to create? They were the practice runs in which God learned the craft of creating?​
 
Upvote 0

Sojourner<><

Incoherent Freedom Fighter
Mar 23, 2005
1,606
14
45
✟24,385.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Critias said:
If one truly cares to learn, to be trained in righteousness, then one will search, learn, understand, and believe the Bible in how it is presented by accepting the Author's meaning and not our own.

I totally agree :thumbsup:
 
Upvote 0

GenemZ

Well-Known Member
Mar 1, 2004
22,169
1,377
75
Atlanta
✟109,031.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
gluadys said:
I feel like Alice in Wonderland. Every statement raises new questions.

I'm late, I'm late, for a very important date!
No time to say hello, goodbye!
I'm late, I'm late, I'm late!
No, no, no,no, no, no, no, I'm overdue.
I'm reallyin a stew.
No time to say goodbye, hello!
I'm late, I'm late, I'm late! :)


Does gap theory make any estimate as to how many creations there were on earth before the present one?

The gap theory only introduces us to the concept of there being another creation. It only let's us know that there was one that preceded this one. That is, as far as Genesis 1, does.

Does it suggest that such human-like creatures existed in all these creations or only the one prior to the present one?

It only mentions one example of human like creation termed "people" in the destruction found in Jeremiah 4.

How does gap theory explain the existence of hominid species which overlap with that of our own species. We know of at least three other human species that lived on earth at the same time as early Homo sapiens.

Not this homo sapien age as far as I know of. Most likely, it was the prior creation. God was introding a new concept to the angels as a teaching tool. At least, that's how I see it. For creation in many ways is designed to be a teaching tool to men, as well as angels. Animals are many times in Scripture used to describe good and bad examples to be found in men.

Are they holdovers from an earlier creation, or did God make them all as part of the present creation?

As far as it can be known. There were no hold overs.


Good title. Describes this line of thinking quite accurately IMO.

Legends, usually involve real people or events. Its the story line that may "evolve" along the way. ;)


So God was like Edison? Had to try and try again through many failures before he got it right. I don't know about Jewish scholars, but I know a lot of Christians would have a problem with that view of God's original incompetence.

That is simply how they applied a legend to what they could know from Scripture. Legends are like that. God was pleased with all his creations. For each one was used to advance knowledge of truth to the angels. The earth is God's classroom for life.

Hebrews 11:3 nasb

"By faith we understand that the worlds were prepared by the word of God, so that what is seen was not made out of things which are visible."

So, is it the view of gap theorists that the older creations were a sort of apprenticeship in learning to create? They were the practice runs in which God learned the craft of creating?

Why would God be perfecting anything? If he already tells us what is coming next? God created the prior creations to advance the knowledge of angels. We must realize, that angels were created in innocence and ignorance. Just like, Adam was created in innocence and ignorance. God used the animals Adam was to name, to teach Adam what his Helpmate was to be for. When the woman was brought his way, he knew in an instant what was to take place between them. But, that's for another post to cover. :)

Grace and peace, GeneZ
 
Upvote 0

shernren

you are not reading this.
Feb 17, 2005
8,463
515
38
Shah Alam, Selangor
Visit site
✟33,881.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
In Relationship
Shernren? Please do not address me, then afterwards quote someone else as if I said it? Thank you.

No, I meant that I can't exactly follow your line of thought, but what I can gather of it is this and that. I.E. that is what I am hearing, but it might not be what you are saying. I was seeking clarification (and a fight, I guess :p). Sorry.

It's ... interesting. All I can say is that my only real reason for rejecting it is a parsimony principle - if two competing theories can explain a certain body of evidence equally well, the simpler theory is better (at least in my book). Choosing between gap theory and TEism is something like that for me. TEism explains all the fossil evidence, scientific evidence, and scriptural evidence (for me) without having to postulate on the intellectual needs of the angels and the previous incarnations of the Earth. So it gets my vote.

Not really. How is it that the plants God created on the third day were limited to dry land?

Critias' "author hermeneutic" would answer that. Look at the verses in question:

Genesis 1 said:
11 Then God said, "Let the land produce vegetation: seed-bearing plants and trees on the land that bear fruit with seed in it, according to their various kinds." And it was so. 12 The land produced vegetation: plants bearing seed according to their kinds and trees bearing fruit with seed in it according to their kinds. And God saw that it was good. 13 And there was evening, and there was morning—the third day.

Well, phytoplankton are neither seed-bearing plants, or fruit-bearing trees. So God didn't create them. ;)
 
Upvote 0

gluadys

Legend
Mar 2, 2004
12,958
682
Toronto
✟39,020.00
Faith
Protestant
Politics
CA-NDP
genez said:
I'm late, I'm late, for a very important date!
No time to say hello, goodbye!
I'm late, I'm late, I'm late!
No, no, no,no, no, no, no, I'm overdue.
I'm reallyin a stew.
No time to say goodbye, hello!
I'm late, I'm late, I'm late! :)
:thumbsup:

The gap theory only introduces us to the concept of there being another creation. It only let's us know that there was one that preceded this one. That is, as far as Genesis 1, does.



It only mentions one example of human like creation termed "people" in the destruction found in Jeremiah 4.

ok

Not this homo sapien age as far as I know of. Most likely, it was the prior creation. God was introding a new concept to the angels as a teaching tool. At least, that's how I see it. For creation in many ways is designed to be a teaching tool to men, as well as angels. Animals are many times in Scripture used to describe good and bad examples to be found in men.



As far as it can be known. There were no hold overs.

This is unclear and a bit self-contradictory. I get the impression this is a question you have not considered before.

But it is an important question. As I understand it gap theory contends that the geologic record shows the remnants of earlier creations and the fossils are of the species which existed in those earlier creations. You also state that at least in the creation immediately prior to ours there were "humans" like us in all respects but not made in the image of God.

The geologic record does show times of global catastrophe and mass extinction -- five in all with the sixth occurring today. The problem is that it shows no mass extinction which completely wiped out all life on earth. One (snowball earth) destroyed 98% of all species living at the time, but 2% survived into the next non-catastrophic period.

It also does not show any mass extinction occurring at any time during human existence even if we include very early Homo species like H. habilis or H. rudolfensis. Not until we get to the 20th century when the current mass extinction was set in motion by our own destructiveness of species and their natural habitat.

Legends, usually involve real people or events. Its the story line that may "evolve" along the way. ;)




That is simply how they applied a legend to what they could know from Scripture. Legends are like that. God was pleased with all his creations. For each one was used to advance knowledge of truth to the angels. The earth is God's classroom for life.

:thumbsup: You are the first creationist I have met who understands this!



Why would God be perfecting anything?

I didn't say perfecting, I said learning, as in learning a craft or skill. That is what this citation implied to me:

He made several other worlds before ours, but He destroyed them all, because He was pleased with none until He created ours."

Sounds like someone who is learning to do something by trial and error and destroying the first attempts because of the errors in them.

But these are not your words, so I won't hold you to them if you disagree with them.
 
Upvote 0

Sojourner<><

Incoherent Freedom Fighter
Mar 23, 2005
1,606
14
45
✟24,385.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
shernren said:
Well, phytoplankton are neither seed-bearing plants, or fruit-bearing trees. So God didn't create them. ;)

Revelations 11 clears that up: "...For You created all things, and by Your will they exist and were created."
 
Upvote 0
C

Critias

Guest
shernren said:
Critias' "author hermeneutic" would answer that. Look at the verses in question:



Well, phytoplankton are neither seed-bearing plants, or fruit-bearing trees. So God didn't create them. ;)

As Sojourner pointed out, if you search the Scriptures you will find your answer.

Genesis doesn't state God created insects specifically, but I think we can conclude God did create them. If He didn't, where did they come from?

It seems you either don't understand this hermeneutical style or you just don't like it. Do you prefer to put your own meaning into the text instead?
 
Upvote 0

GenemZ

Well-Known Member
Mar 1, 2004
22,169
1,377
75
Atlanta
✟109,031.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
gluadys said:
This is unclear and a bit self-contradictory. I get the impression this is a question you have not considered before.

That is not the case. I simply do not know how to classify the humanoid creation. For if it was the same as ours, then Jesus would have to die for their souls. But, these were not a part of this world. Jesus only died for the sins of this world. "World" in the Bible quite often speaks of all mankind that exists in this creation.

But it is an important question. As I understand it gap theory contends that the geologic record shows the remnants of earlier creations and the fossils are of the species which existed in those earlier creations. You also state that at least in the creation immediately prior to ours there were "humans" like us in all respects but not made in the image of God.

Professor Stan Ashby (Ancient Languages, Harvard) who after retirement taught at a Bible College, taught on the word used by Jeremiah. "People", he explained, was a generic term used for men.

Jeremiah 4:24-25 niv
" I looked at the mountains,
and they were quaking;
all the hills were swaying.

I looked, and there were no people;
every bird in the sky had flown away."




Like the word "cat" can be used for a tom cat and a mountain lion, this term was used for mankind. Has there been any time in our history that mankind was wiped out? If, yes? Then how could we be here now? :)

Jeremiah spoke the same words used in Genesis 1:2! The world was a mess, not just some nation!

23 I looked at the earth,
and it was formless and empty;
and at the heavens,
and their light was gone.


That sounds like it must have just preceded what we find in Genesis 1:2. For, that is what how we found this planet just before God refurbished the earth with this latest creation.




The geologic record does show times of global catastrophe and mass extinction -- five in all with the sixth occurring today. The problem is that it shows no mass extinction which completely wiped out all life on earth. One (snowball earth) destroyed 98% of all species living at the time, but 2% survived into the next non-catastrophic period.

Even in the next creation certain known species will exist along with new ones. The lion will eat like the ox. The ox will appear to be the same.


It also does not show any mass extinction occurring at any time during human existence even if we include very early Homo species like H. habilis or H. rudolfensis. Not until we get to the 20th century when the current mass extinction was set in motion by our own destructiveness of species and their natural habitat.

Mass extinctions may have not have always come from God's hand. Satan when he fell lost his perfection. And, like when Adam fell, the existing creation fell with him.

My belief is that Satan may have been trying to prove himself worthy of not being condemnable by God, but he lost control over an imperfect world that revealed that he was flawed. He at his fall thought he could replace the Lord, and here he was being shown to be an impotent leader! I can not go into details at the moment, but Satan had the power for executing such mass extinctions. In a fury of temper, I believe there were times he wiped out large parts of creation that were making him look the fool. For he thought he could replace God. And, now he was shown to be powerless to control what was fallen like himself. Fallen creation reflected his own imperfection and his megalomaniacal pride reacted in a violent rage against what he was to have dominion over, but could not run perfectly.



I didn't say perfecting, I said learning, as in learning a craft or skill. That is what this citation implied to me:

God never learns. He already has told us what is to be.

He made several other worlds before ours, but He destroyed them all, because He was pleased with none until He created ours."


That was not the word's we find in the Bible. God was pleased, or he would not have created them. They served as teaching tools. Just like we graduated from one grade, and moved on to the next.... Each consecutive creation was the next grade up in education for the angels.

The very fact that creation started out very simple indicates this. It was the proverbial "first grade" for angels. It kept progressing along in greater complexity. It appears the last creation before ours is when Satan and his angels reached a dead end. Not more lessons in that manner. They lost dominion over the planet and God replaced the headship with Adam. This creation was to serve a new purpose all together. For now man and angels both are recipients of learning from God things of Eternal value. In the past what ever creation was destroyed, its purpose ended right then.


Sounds like someone who is learning to do something by trial and error and destroying the first attempts because of the errors in them.

Nope. You are making God into a superman. Not, God. He always knew you would think that at this moment. If God did not know all things he could not have imputed all your personal sins on Jesus on the Cross. If God did not know all there is to know about you long before you were born, he could not have saved you. For every sin you ever commit in your lifetime Jesus had to pay for. Mine, too. And, the entire worlds! That would give any super creature a big headache! Impossible to do if he had to learn anything.

God does not have thoughts like we do. God does not figure out anything. God does not solve problems for himself. He does not learn.

But these are not your words, so I won't hold you to them if you disagree with them.

Correct, They were not my words. Those ancient Jewish scholars just did not know how to put together what they could see. They do like many do today. They guess based upon what can be known. They were able to see that other creations did exist before this one. That much they could deduce from Scripture.

Grace and peace, GeneZ
 
Upvote 0

nephilimiyr

I've Been Keepin My Eyes Wide Open
Jan 21, 2003
23,433
1,799
62
Wausau Wisconsin
Visit site
✟55,552.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
Hi gluadys
gluadys said:
As I understand it gap theory contends that the geologic record shows the remnants of earlier creations and the fossils are of the species which existed in those earlier creations.
I believe in the gap theory and I never heard that one before. There may have been some who believe in the gap theory who also have said this but the gap theory does in no way explain geologic record. The gap theory does not form it's belief around geologic or biologic record. The gap theory is a belief in interpretation of what the Bible says. The foundation of this belief is found within the first couple verses in Genesis 1. A major point in the gap theory is that in the English translation the gap theory is a possibility but in understanding the orignal Hebrew in which the book was written it is a probability. Geologic evidence is not necessary, only a belief in God's word.

There maybe some gap theorists that say the geologic evidence points to the gap theory being correct, oh well, so do evolutionists and creationists.

The major point in believeing the gap theory is correct is that there is a gap in time between the first and second verses of Genesis 1. The gap theorist doesn't have to know how long this gap in time was nor does he have to explain it in scientific evidence because the belief is based on a matter of useing proper ancient Hebrew grammer and understanding of the language
 
Upvote 0

nephilimiyr

I've Been Keepin My Eyes Wide Open
Jan 21, 2003
23,433
1,799
62
Wausau Wisconsin
Visit site
✟55,552.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
Hello genez
genez said:
Those ancient Jewish scholars just did not know how to put together what they could see. They do like many do today. They guess based upon what can be known. They were able to see that other creations did exist before this one. That much they could deduce from Scripture.
I agree, man today classifies his guesses as facts based upon what is known but never wanting to come to the conclussion that what is known is only a small fraction of what there is to know and there are many things yet for us to understand that can make what we know to be true today is actually not true at all..

God knows it all. I am at point A and He is at point B. He tells me what is at point B and I believe Him. Man is at point A and trying to get to point B through understanding. If we see ourselves as only being about 1/10th of the way there that means there is alot of info we don't know yet and the info we know to be true now may be renendered obsolete by the time we make it to point B. Only to find that God was right all along. That if we really wanted to know what He knows all we had to do was to believe Him.

LOL, I hope that made sense to some of you...
 
Upvote 0

gluadys

Legend
Mar 2, 2004
12,958
682
Toronto
✟39,020.00
Faith
Protestant
Politics
CA-NDP
nephilimiyr said:
Hi gluadys

I believe in the gap theory and I never heard that one before.

Great. I am glad to have a second person who subscribes to gap theory in the conversation. I expect that like most theories everyone brings a personal perspective that is a little different.

There may have been some who believe in the gap theory who also have said this but the gap theory does in no way explain geologic record. The gap theory does not form it's belief around geologic or biologic record. The gap theory is a belief in interpretation of what the Bible says. The foundation of this belief is found within the first couple verses in Genesis 1.

It is not so much explaining the geological record as being consistent with it. I realize gap theory was created from studying the bible long before we had any inkling of the age of the earth, so it was not developed in order to explain the geologic record.

But it does seem to me that in the 19th century, gap theorists appropriated the geological discovery of the antiquity of the earth as a scientific validation that they were on the right track as compared to young earth theories. So while geologic evidence would not be necessary, it was seen as providing a welcome additional support.

Now that is what I gleaned from a very brief investigation of gap theory nearly 30 years ago. Things may have changed since then.


There maybe some gap theorists that say the geologic evidence points to the gap theory being correct, oh well, so do evolutionists and creationists.

Yes, as noted above, that has been my understanding.

The major point in believeing the gap theory is correct is that there is a gap in time between the first and second verses of Genesis 1. The gap theorist doesn't have to know how long this gap in time was nor does he have to explain it in scientific evidence because the belief is based on a matter of useing proper ancient Hebrew grammer and understanding of the language

If the gap was an actual occurrence in the history of the earth, the gap theorist does need to know when it occurred and how long it lasted and when it ended. A global destruction of the sort envisaged by gap theory could not fail to leave its mark in the geologic record, just as the meteor impact of 65 million years ago left a global record of iridium in the earth.

If one cannot identify the occurrence of the gap geologically, the only rational explanation is that it did not happen in history.

The same applies biologically. If just prior to 6,000 years ago there was no life on earth at all, and it was all created rapidly in 6 days, the genetic markers in the genomes of all species should show a bottleneck occurring at that time. They don't.

While scientists differ somewhat on the occasion of the last bottleneck in human history, none suggests a date more recent than 70,000 years ago. Furthermore, there is no simultaneous bottleneck in all species since the mass extinction of 65 million years ago.

So I can understand if modern gap theorists have moved away from suggesting that science supports the theory. That may have appeared to be the case in the early 1800s, but it depended on a superficial view of geology. The more detailed view of geology, and now of genetics, offered by modern science clearly contradicts gap theory as a correct model of the history of life on earth.

I don't quarrel with the gap interpretation of Gen. 1:2. Its a possibility, maybe a probability. But reading over genez's explanations of gap theory from the bible, I find gap theory tends to build a gigantic and unknowable history on the slender foundation of the correct interpretation of a single word in the bible. I don't think the basis is sufficient to support the super-structure.

For example, do you agree with genez that the purpose of different creations was to instruct angels? Where, in scripture does that idea come from?
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.