• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

A rock so big, it can't be moved.

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Sort by date Sort by votes

Paradoxum

Liberty, Equality, Solidarity!
Sep 16, 2011
10,712
654
✟35,688.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Of course he can't make a rock so heavy he can't move (not that weigh would mean anything to God).

It is like asking if God can move something that he has chosen not to move. Well yes he could, if he chose to move it.

It makes much more sense to me that omnipotence is an act of will, rather than an act of power. It would be just as easy for God to create the world as to move a feather.

Saying 'God can do anything' or that 'God is all-powerful' is really unhelpful when trying to have a reasonable understanding of omnipotence. A connected idea is whether God is beyond logic. Well if we place God outside logic we might as well stop talking about God. The word God becomes meaningless nonsense covered in mysterious terms.
 
Reactions: jacks and The Engineer
Upvote 0

GoldenBoy89

We're Still Here
Sep 25, 2012
26,670
29,488
LA
✟658,738.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
HitchSlap said:
It's often said, and many believe, that god is omnipotent, omnipresent and omniscient... which begs one question...

Does god know he can make a rock so big he can't move it?
Click to expand...

I would have to say, if he's omniscient then yes, he knows of a particular scenario where he couldn't move the rock. I sometimes wonder if God has rules He must follow. Perhaps the laws of nature, perhaps laws we can't even begin to imagine -I'm no expert

But back to the rock.... If God can do anything, he can simultaneously hold the notion of moving the rock and not moving the rock. No matter how illogical that might seem to us simple mortals
 
Upvote 0

elopez

Well-Known Member
Oct 11, 2010
2,503
92
Lansing, MI
✟25,706.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
HitchSlap said:
Does god know he can make a rock so big he can't move it?
Click to expand...
There is no rock so big that God could not move it. That is because omnipotence means God has power over all things. He is all - powerful. Nothing has more power or is too heavy for God.

So it's not a matter of God not knowing or not being able to move a rock so big, yet a matter of the request being illegitimate, as it would be a contradiction for something to be more powerful or too big or heavy for Him.
 
Upvote 0
A

astein

Well-Known Member
Mar 1, 2013
1,825
42
✟2,254.00
Faith
Christian
HitchSlap said:
It's often said, and many believe, that god is omnipotent, omnipresent and omniscient... which begs one question...

Does god know he can make a rock so big he can't move it?
Click to expand...

Doubt is a heavy burden some choose to bear.(glimpses)

With God, all things are possible.
 
Upvote 0

The Engineer

I defeated Dr Goetz
Jul 29, 2012
629
31
✟23,423.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
The existence of a rock that can't be lifted and a being that can lift said rock are mutually exclusive. Both existing at the same time would be a paradox.

In the end, it boils down to the question of whether God is bound by the laws of logic or not. If he is, he can't create a rock he can't lift and then lift it. If you ask me, this means he isn't omnipotent, not in the strict sense, at least.

Paradoxum sums the alternative up quite well, if you ask me:
Paradoxum said:
Well if we place God outside logic we might as well stop talking about God. The word God becomes meaningless nonsense covered in mysterious terms.
Click to expand...

The existence of an omnipotent God would be illogical, and assuming the existence of an illogical entity is irrational.
 
Upvote 0

Paradoxum

Liberty, Equality, Solidarity!
Sep 16, 2011
10,712
654
✟35,688.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats

Why do you think omnipotence should include being able to do illogical things?
 
Upvote 0

Paradoxum

Liberty, Equality, Solidarity!
Sep 16, 2011
10,712
654
✟35,688.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
The Engineer said:
Omnipotence is unlimited power. If power is limited by the rules of logic, it's still limited.
Click to expand...

I'm not sure if that is just word games. Comparable to saying that if there is nothing in a box then there must be something, because if there is nothing in there then that 'nothing' is something.

To think that logic is a limit could be a misunderstanding of logic and language.

As I said in my last post, I don't think omnipotence has anything to do with power. Using the word unlimited is also unhelpful. It makes more sense to me to think of omnipotence as being able to do anything, and then try to work out more specifically what that would mean.

It pretty much comes down to making up a definition for the word. I just don't consider it helpful to turn it into a pointless concept, such as by making it go beyond logic.
 
Upvote 0

elopez

Well-Known Member
Oct 11, 2010
2,503
92
Lansing, MI
✟25,706.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
The Engineer said:
In the end, it boils down to the question of whether God is bound by the laws of logic or not. If he is, he can't create a rock he can't lift and then lift it. If you ask me, this means he isn't omnipotent, not in the strict sense, at least.
Click to expand...
It is not even a matter of God being bound by logic or not. The issue is about the situation itself, more specifically whether or not the situation is even a legitimate request.

You are essentially saying God is not omnipotent because there is no rock too heavy for Him, which is to say God is not all - powerful because a rock cannot be too heavy for Him, which is is just ridiculous and does not follow at all. In fact, God would retain omnipotence in the case that there is no such rock, as omnipotence should be defined exactly as it is "all - powerful." Nothing has more power than God. Nothing can thwart His will.
 
Upvote 0
Q

QueSi

Well-Known Member
Jan 15, 2013
1,511
41
Mississippi
✟2,027.00
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Single
HitchSlap said:
It's often said, and many believe, that god is omnipotent, omnipresent and omniscient... which begs one question...

Does god know he can make a rock so big he can't move it?
Click to expand...

I have heard this plenty of times and still fail to understand how something with an infinite amount of potential strength could not move something with a finite size. God = infinite, rock = finite, God > rock like infinite > finite. Simple, easy math.
 
Upvote 0
G

Gottservant

God loves your words, may men love them also
Site Supporter
Aug 3, 2006
11,383
704
46
✟276,687.00
Faith
Messianic
The Engineer said:
The existence of a rock that can't be lifted and a being that can lift said rock are mutually exclusive. Both existing at the same time would be a paradox.
Click to expand...

Interesting that someone who wants to contradict God can find a paradox to stop Him, but if the same person examines the quantum world, he can easily find a way to say something both happens and doesn't happen at the same time.
 
Upvote 0

HitchSlap

PROUDLY PRIMATE
Aug 6, 2012
14,723
5,468
✟288,596.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Gottservant said:
Interesting that someone who wants to contradict God can find a paradox to stop Him, but if the same person examines the quantum world, he can easily find a way to say something both happens and doesn't happen at the same time.
Click to expand...

Could you take this thought further, and say god does and does not exist?
 
Upvote 0
A

AlexBP

Newbie
Apr 20, 2010
2,063
104
43
Virginia
✟25,340.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Thank you for posting that. The question that HitchSlap asked is so easily answered that even an atheist should be able to figure it out without much difficulty.
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

God, omnibenevolent or omnipotent and omniscient?
Replies
82
Views
3K
Christian Philosophy & Ethics
GoldenKingGaze
Air Force reservist punished for saying 'men can't birth babies' can proceed with lawsuit: judge
Replies
3
Views
205
Current News & Events (Articles Required)
RileyG
B
A perspective on Baptism and the plan of salvation that I have not heard before
Replies
36
Views
2K
Denomination Specific Theology
ChubbyCherub
If God Is Love, Why Does He Let Terrible Things Happen?
Replies
9
Views
707
One Bread, One Body - Catholic
GoldenKingGaze
What do Seventh-Day Adventist believe.
Replies
1
Views
350
New Adventist / Bible Study
truthuprootsevil
T
Menu
Log in
Register