• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

A response to Ben Stein

MoonLancer

The Moon is a reflection of the MorningStar
Aug 10, 2007
5,765
166
✟29,524.00
Faith
Buddhist
Marital Status
In Relationship

Do you know what free speech is? tell me. I doubt you can.

yell "fire!" in the crowded theater. yell "all your bombs are belong to us!" on a plane. Is that free speech?

they diden't want to pay Stine, he diden't want to talk for free.

apparently you don't know the deference between paid speech and free speech

so if a school doesn't pay ME to talk its censorship? if a forum (this forum to be specific) censers my profanity or my view point (and they have), then they are breaking the first amendment?

is this your defense? weak sauce.
 
Upvote 0

MoonLancer

The Moon is a reflection of the MorningStar
Aug 10, 2007
5,765
166
✟29,524.00
Faith
Buddhist
Marital Status
In Relationship
removed by me! i bet your now wondering what was said here, you can ask and i will pm it to you ;p. Well to say the least i wonder if self censorship is a form of censorship that is prohibited by the first amendment. what do you think Rob?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Hespera

Junior Member
Dec 16, 2008
7,237
201
usa
✟8,860.00
Faith
Buddhist
Marital Status
Private



Would you stop someone or pay them if they want to "blaspheme" in your church?

Would you call it censorship if you didn't want the state to pay for an art work that had a crucifix in a bottle of urine? Is it censorship if you personally dont pay?

Stein made a really good move! Made people think it is a "free speech" issue when Stein is against free speech! He wont give his speech for free. He has to be paid to exercise free speech. My my.

When a person makes a lot of spelling, grammar and punctuation errors and then talks about how other people are dumb, it makes you wonder btw.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Hespera

Junior Member
Dec 16, 2008
7,237
201
usa
✟8,860.00
Faith
Buddhist
Marital Status
Private
Technically, "free speech" only means that government cannot prevent or penalize individuals from expressing ideas. Everyone else can censor pretty much as they see fit.


Exactly, its not a free speech issue in a 1st amendment sort of way.
 
Upvote 0

RobertByers

Regular Member
Feb 26, 2008
714
9
60
✟23,409.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single

Context. Context.
Its not the scientific community (whatever that is) but particular ideas that came up in origin issues. Evolution etc.
He doesn';t mean Einstein or Jewish scientists or anyone save the few in these small circles that dealt with evolution or aspects related.

There are charges against these people.
There are charges against these studies today in being prohibitive of opposition in powerful ways
fair accusation against motives or competence.

Clearly this is so.
The censorship makes the case for the movie.
a thinking person will be more interested in watching the movie who didn't before.
 
Upvote 0

RobertByers

Regular Member
Feb 26, 2008
714
9
60
✟23,409.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single

the attacks and denial of payment were a intent to deny a person speaking because of what they had said or might.
this is the essence of free speech, free expression, free enquiry.
Its a attack of thought and words.
they believed words mattered here. so they said no.
Not those words. Just words allowed. other words EXPELLED.
 
Upvote 0

RobertByers

Regular Member
Feb 26, 2008
714
9
60
✟23,409.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
removed by me! i bet your now wondering what was said here, you can ask and i will pm it to you ;p. Well to say the least i wonder if self censorship is a form of censorship that is prohibited by the first amendment. what do you think Rob?

Huh?
If I follow your making a point.
Its the spirit of fredom of thought and words.
not legallly.

its a clear intent to stop speech because of previous speech and repeating that speech.
Not the historical passion of America to allow free speech to further progress. The satisfaction being allowed of all having their say and then beat it with better speech.
This is a silly story of repression of common ideas that gou into the uncommon circles of mass media. This is a knee jerk reaction of a establishment headed for destruction on many matters. They show by this censorship and attempt at controll what is always going on in many areas.
 
Upvote 0

RobertByers

Regular Member
Feb 26, 2008
714
9
60
✟23,409.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Technically, "free speech" only means that government cannot prevent or penalize individuals from expressing ideas. Everyone else can censor pretty much as they see fit.

Your right. In America one does not have free speech in our fathers home. or anywhere. let others stopping our speech misses the point of freedom of speech not being controled by government means it isn't to be controled by anyone. The people are free. the belief. yet also free to dent speech in their special possessions.
Schools are everybodies stuff. not private as such.
 
Upvote 0

Cabal

Well-Known Member
Jul 22, 2007
11,592
476
39
London
✟37,512.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Engaged
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats

If that is what he meant, he should be more careful with his words (never mind the fact that "scientists" should read "Nazis" in the above concentration camp quote, but nevermind, a quantifying adjective in front of "scientists" would make it at least MARGINALLY better.)

I'm sure I read something in some old book somewhere about the tongue being like a small fire, but it's probably nothing important...


And I say to you again - if I came and called you the worst things under the sun (regardless of their actual veracity, but rather of how YOU perceive them to be very negative and untrue things to say about you) and then expected you to engage in rational discourse with me, but you refused (due to being utterly offended by the accusation and their unashamedness) - if I then cried conspiracy, would you say I was acting like a total sociopath? I think you would.

The fact that you're sticking up for this guy doesn't make you much better than him, honestly.
 
Upvote 0
I think creationists are the most stupid group of people living on this planet today,
they are blinkered or blind not to see what's going on around them.

I would also like to take this opportunity to ask if I could make a date to visit your church,
I would like to give a talk on the evils of creationism, an early reply would be appreciated,
I would not require any expenses or payment for my talk as I feel it's my duty to warn people about creationism.
thank you.
 
Reactions: Cabal
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,868
52,574
Guam
✟5,140,204.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I think creationists are the most stupid group of people living on this planet today,
they are blinkered or blind not to see what's going on around them.
Are you a creationist?

If not, please explain why most people here say stuff like:

  • These mountains were created by...
  • These cliffs were created by...
  • The Grand Canyon was created by...
 
Upvote 0