• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

A Reasoned Case Against Impeachment

civilwarbuff

Constitutionalist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2015
15,873
7,590
Columbus
✟756,257.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
From the Mueller Report investigation, the Democrats took White House counsel McGhan to court - that process has taken months so far....and is now under appeal. Trump knows very well that he can run out the clock on the court cases. Pelosi knows this as well. Ironically, Trump is all for accelerating the process...apparently both Trump and Pelosi are seeking to have this process rapped up in January.....

IMO, there should be a process whereby the House can take cases such as this directly to the Supreme Court for a more timely decision.
So, sounds as if this comment is a vote for 'close enough' for impeachment. Thank goodness for the rest of us that the court system does not work on such a system.
Wonder if the dems thought playing brinkmanship would work in their favor?
 
Upvote 0

civilwarbuff

Constitutionalist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2015
15,873
7,590
Columbus
✟756,257.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
Constitutional attorney Neil Katyal, the Republican committee's attorney quoted from one of Katyal's books during the hearing, critiques Turley's testimony.

Are you claiming that this guy is the Republican Committee's attorney? Cuz that just ain't so......

'He'd do it again': Former Obama official says Trump must be impeached

Neal Katyal
Neal Kumar Katyal is an American lawyer and partner at Hogan Lovells, as well as Paul and Patricia Saunders Professor of National Security Law at Georgetown University Law Center. Katyal served as Acting Solicitor General of the United States from May 2010 until June 2011. Previously, Katyal served in as an attorney in the Solicitor General's office as Principal Deputy Solicitor General in the U.S. Justice Department.Wikipedia
Born:Neal Kumar Katyal, Mar 12, 1970, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.
Political party:Democratic
Education:Dartmouth College, Yale University

 
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
42,463
45,577
Los Angeles Area
✟1,013,689.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
Are you claiming that this guy is the Republican Committee's attorney?

No, Hank didn't. Give your keyboard a rest and spend some time reading carefully.

"the Republican committee's attorney quoted from one of Katyal's books during the hearing"
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hank77
Upvote 0

Hank77

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 26, 2015
26,648
15,696
✟1,223,430.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Are you claiming that this guy is the Republican Committee's attorney? Cuz that just ain't so......
That is not what I wrote. I said that he was giving a critque of Turley testimony.
I said that the attorney for the Republicans, quoted from one of his books during the hearings.
 
Upvote 0

civilwarbuff

Constitutionalist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2015
15,873
7,590
Columbus
✟756,257.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
No, Hank didn't. Give your keyboard a rest and spend some time reading carefully.

"the Republican committee's attorney quoted from one of Katyal's books during the hearing"
The way it is written can be interpreted as I said.
 
Upvote 0

wing2000

E pluribus unum
Site Supporter
Aug 18, 2012
25,100
21,166
✟1,750,794.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
So, sounds as if this comment is a vote for 'close enough' for impeachment. Thank goodness for the rest of us that the court system does not work on such a system.
Wonder if the dems thought playing brinkmanship would work in their favor?

When I read the phone summary of that July phone call and all the supporting testimony of the non-partisan witnesses over the last month, there is no doubt there is more than "enough" to impeach the President.

...unless of course, you subscribe to the notion they have to a tape recording of the President ordering Guiliani to dig up dirt on the Bidens. On that note, I suppose they could ask Putin for the tapes -- but I doubt he would comply given the unprecedented success the Russian state has achieved to date.
 
Upvote 0

Hank77

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 26, 2015
26,648
15,696
✟1,223,430.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Are you claiming that this guy is the Republican Committee's attorney? Cuz that just ain't so......

'He'd do it again': Former Obama official says Trump must be impeached

Neal Katyal
Neal Kumar Katyal is an American lawyer and partner at Hogan Lovells, as well as Paul and Patricia Saunders Professor of National Security Law at Georgetown University Law Center. Katyal served as Acting Solicitor General of the United States from May 2010 until June 2011. Previously, Katyal served in as an attorney in the Solicitor General's office as Principal Deputy Solicitor General in the U.S. Justice Department.Wikipedia
Born:Neal Kumar Katyal, Mar 12, 1970, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.
Political party:Democratic
Education:Dartmouth College, Yale University

Your smile emojies indicate that you think that the officers of the court can't be unbiased in their service in our court system. They MUST be biased and untrustworthy. But would you be less sarcastic if he were a Republic? I don't think so seeing Mueller, who was a Republican, was disparaged, by Trump supporters, too.

You'd probably be surprised at the comaraderie between the justices on the Supreme Court, it wouldn't please the partisans among us.
 
Upvote 0

civilwarbuff

Constitutionalist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2015
15,873
7,590
Columbus
✟756,257.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
Your smile emojies indicate that you think that the officers of the court can't be unbiased in their service in our court system. They MUST be biased and untrustworthy. But would you be less sarcastic if he were a Republic? I don't think so seeing Mueller, who was a Republican, was disparaged, by Trump supporters, too.

You'd probably be surprised at the comaraderie between the justices on the Supreme Court, it wouldn't please the partisans among us.
Those were not mine, they cropped up in the pasting.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hank77
Upvote 0

civilwarbuff

Constitutionalist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2015
15,873
7,590
Columbus
✟756,257.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
When I read the phone summary of that July phone call and all the supporting testimony of the non-partisan witnesses over the last month, there is no doubt there is more than "enough" to impeach the President.

...unless of course, you subscribe to the notion they have to a tape recording of the President ordering Guiliani to dig up dirt on the Bidens. On that note, I suppose they could ask Putin for the tapes -- but I doubt he would comply given the unprecedented success the Russian state has achieved to date.
Well, thank God that most of us will never be convicted of anything based on such 'evidence'.......
 
Upvote 0

wing2000

E pluribus unum
Site Supporter
Aug 18, 2012
25,100
21,166
✟1,750,794.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Well, thank God that most of us will never be convicted of anything based on such 'evidence'.......

....people have been dismissed from their leadership jobs for much less.
 
Upvote 0

stevil

Godless and without morals
Feb 5, 2011
8,548
6,729
✟293,653.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
IMO, there should be a process whereby the House can take cases such as this directly to the Supreme Court for a more timely decision.
It's a complete waste of time and money when you know that any lower court decision will be appealed.
In this case I doubt Trump's team are hoping they might win in the courts, they know their game is just to play out the clock.
 
Upvote 0

wing2000

E pluribus unum
Site Supporter
Aug 18, 2012
25,100
21,166
✟1,750,794.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Yes they have but that doesn't make it right....

The impeachment inquiry is right by the Constitution. Impeachment is ultimately a check on the power of the Executive branch. The power was intentionally given to the Congress, not the courts.
 
Upvote 0

civilwarbuff

Constitutionalist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2015
15,873
7,590
Columbus
✟756,257.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
The impeachment inquiry is right by the Constitution. Impeachment is ultimately a check on the power of the Executive branch. The power was intentionally given to the Congress, not the courts.
I am quite aware of that....but the reasons for the impeachment are wrong. To proceed this route without substantiated evidence is simply wrong and lowers the bar to a level that the democrats are going to come to regret one day. Ask Schumer about the 'nuclear option' he went to even against McConnell's strong protest.
 
Upvote 0