• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

A reality check?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Iacobus

Well-Known Member
Feb 29, 2004
424
56
68
Visit site
✟845.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Rick of Wessex said:
Hello, Iacobus. :wave:
Perhaps this is
the interview with His Holiness that you mentioned it? Hope it helps.
In XC,
Rick
Yes, that's the one. Thank you, Rick.

I thought about simply posting this in the existing thread about the
upcoming meeting between Pope John-Paul II and His Holiness Patriarch
Bartholomew, but I think there are two important issues that we, as Orthodox
and as members of CF, need to specifically address. The first part of the
issue is really endemic to many Orthodox generally. There is a fear that
our Bishops, and particularly the EP, will essentially sell out Orthodoxy to
the RCC. That is the first thing that we need to confront.

As Orthodox Christians, our calling is to strive for theosis - to work out
our salvation within the very Ark of Salvation. The Orthodox Church has
sailed along very well for 2000 years, and there is no reason to think that
it won't continue. Yet because we know that we have found the pearl of
great price, we are terrified of losing it, and we know that capitulation to
the doctrines and innovation of Rome would indeed be a loss.

This fear is fed by the statements of some of the Patriarchs, and the EP in
particular has become the focus of that fear. Yet in this case, if we
carefully examine what the EP says, we can see that he has not said anything
that suggests that he is selling out Orthodoxy. Yesterday, I posted the
text of a speech that he gave at Georgetown University where he emphatically
talked about the differences between the two churches being "ontological" -
a strong term that means that the two are different in the most basic and
essential ways. Rick provided the link to a very recent interview the
Patriarch gave to a RC newspaper. In that interview, the Patriarch speaks
very clearly of papal pretensions. He also elaborates a very important
theme, that the RCC in particular and western Christianity generally, is
built on an attitude of worldly power that is antithetical to the spirit of
Christ. Neither of those statements are suggestive of an unseemly race to
the altar with Rome.

What they do suggest is this: that the Patriarch speaks in the language of
diplomats and, I might add, the best lawyers. He is cordial and
conciliatory, yet firm. I do not doubt that he has good personal relations
with the Pope and others in the RC hierarchy. But we need to separate the
wheat from the chaff, and look at what he is really saying. In my work, I
am cordial and friendly with many lawyers and judges with whom I strongly
disagree. I may have lunch with them, trade jokes, tell stories, help them
when they are in need and generally be nice. But it does not change the
fundamental disagreements that we have. I think the same dynamic is at play
here. Also keep in mind that when these things are reported, they are
typically reported by the RC press. What newspaper does not adopt a
particular tone? Take it with a grain of salt.

The second issue is one peculiar to CF, but I think unconsciously influences
us in many respects, and that is the way that we sometimes let OBOB dictate
the tone of the discussion. While I really like those guys, it is also true
that when it comes to issues of RCC - EO relations, they are by turns
typically patronizing and triumphal. We let that get to us. We don't need
to.

I'm the first to admit that I should not ever venture into OBOB. Sometimes
I just can't believe what I read. Our doctrine is undeveloped, we don't
know our doctrine, the Patriarchs are on the verge of submitting to the
Pope, etc., etc. But the fact of the matter is that they are simply wrong.

For my part, I think we should let our Catholic friends continue to delude
themselves. Their delusions of an imminent submission of the Patriarchs to
Rome are demonstrably untrue. Ignore them. Instead, we should allow
ourselves to be reassured. Going to someone's house, or having them over to
your house, which is what the EP is doing, is a long way from marrying that
person. Sometimes it's just the neighborly thing to do. Let's concentrate on
being Orthodox ourselves, and not live in fear and resentment. Simply
working out our salvation within Orthodoxy is enough to keep us occupied.

Let's all sit back. Take a deep breath. We are in the Church, or on the
road into it. Let that assurance wash over us, and let us all of us here at
TAW, as people who love the Lord, our Church and each other, take this
journey of joy and repentance together, secure in the knowledge that we're
home, and home isn't going anywhere.

In Christ,
James
 
R

Rilian

Guest
Iacobus, I think you put your finger on exactly what I was thinking today. I don’t know that much about Bartholomew, but I get the impression he is realistic and pragmatic. I don’t get the impression he is going to sell Orthodoxy out to gain some kind of expedient union. Should he do such a thing, the example of Florence and Lyons is always there as a reminder of how the laity will react. Much of the reaction I see to his visit to Rome seems to be inspired by fear, but I don’t think we should be fearful. I think we should be confident in our faith, confident in its durability and hopeful that the profile of Orthodoxy will be raised in the West. Perhaps instead of weakening Orthodoxy, there’s the potential that people will discover what is a largely a hidden treasure - the faith of the apostles alive and well in the year 2004.

I just try to be an optimist I guess.
 
Upvote 0

Moros

Well-Known Member
Jan 1, 2004
12,333
444
✟37,337.00
Faith
Buddhist
Marital Status
Single
You all should watch the interview with Bartholomew on the GOA website.

http://realserver.goarch.org/ram/en/bartholomew_interview.ram

When he says that jurisdictions should be abolished while constantly making trips to Rome, yeah, that is worrysome.

Listen to some of the other things he says as well.
 
Upvote 0

Oblio

Creed or Chaos
Jun 24, 2003
22,324
865
65
Georgia - USA
Visit site
✟27,610.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Great OP James !

Bruncvik said:
When he says that jurisdictions should be abolished while constantly making trips to Rome, yeah, that is worrysome.

Why ?

IMO (and of most EOC I have spoken to) jurisdictionalism is sinful and counter to the spread of the Orthodox Gospel, which is, last I checked, part of our job description.
 
Upvote 0

MariaRegina

Well-Known Member
Jun 26, 2003
53,283
14,159
Visit site
✟115,460.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Oblio said:
Great OP James !



Why ?

IMO (and of most EOC I have spoken to) jurisdictionalism is sinful and counter to the spread of the Orthodox Gospel, which is, last I checked, part of our job description.

Why, it's the centralization of power that some people fear.

Power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely - The Lord Acton.

It's best not to go further as this topic upsets a lot of people.

Let's just pray and remain rooted in Christ.

As long as one bishop keeps the faith -- I'll move to his diocese if necessary.
 
Upvote 0

Oblio

Creed or Chaos
Jun 24, 2003
22,324
865
65
Georgia - USA
Visit site
✟27,610.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
When he speaks of jurisdictions I think of the situation in this country with the uncanonical multiple Bishops per region and not the individual Churches, one per major geographic region. I don't know what the EP was speaking of though. I agree that there should never be 'one' national Church (be it Russian, Greek or whatever), that would lead to the abuses that you speak of.
 
Upvote 0

MariaRegina

Well-Known Member
Jun 26, 2003
53,283
14,159
Visit site
✟115,460.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
jeffthefinn said:
It would seem if the EP does not like the jurisdictional mess in the New World he could go a long way to heal that himself by releasing the GOA.
Jeff the Finn

That's part of the problem. If he releases the GOA then he won't have the money to pay the taxes (aka ransom money) to the Turks. Then he will lose his patriarchal headquarters. It's called blackmail.
 
Upvote 0

Orthodox Andrew

Orthodox Church- Telling The Truth Since 33 A.D.
Aug 24, 2003
3,177
166
39
Visit site
✟27,048.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Aria said:
That's part of the problem. If he releases the GOA then he won't have the money to pay the taxes (aka ransom money) to the Turks. Then he will lose his patriarchal headquarters. It's called blackmail.

How much does he need to pay the taxes?
 
Upvote 0

MariaRegina

Well-Known Member
Jun 26, 2003
53,283
14,159
Visit site
✟115,460.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
I don't know. But there are several books that I read which talked about the heavy taxation imposed on Christians in muslim countries, especially in Turkey. Several Orthodox Priest indicated this but this is an area that they cannot discuss. It's extremely sensitive politically speaking. Let's put it this way, the EP's life is in continuous danger.
 
Upvote 0

Oblio

Creed or Chaos
Jun 24, 2003
22,324
865
65
Georgia - USA
Visit site
✟27,610.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Bruncvik said:
And a central authority in the EP would be better?

No. But the EP does not (AP blunders aside) have primacy of authority, nor would he if we got rid of the plethora of jurisdictions in America. Organizational authority (in this country) would rest with the Metropolitan of America. Or are you saying that the EP desires this centralized authority over all the EO Churches ?
 
Upvote 0

Iacobus

Well-Known Member
Feb 29, 2004
424
56
68
Visit site
✟845.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Aria said:
Why, it's the centralization of power that some people fear.

Power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely - The Lord Acton.

It's best not to go further as this topic upsets a lot of people.

Let's just pray and remain rooted in Christ.

As long as one bishop keeps the faith -- I'll move to his diocese if necessary.

Hmmmm. This thread went places I didn't anticipate. A couple of points:

1. I agree with Oblio about the jurisdictional issue. It is uncanonical to have multiple bishops in one city, and I think that is what the EP is speaking of.

Beyond that, however, I would probably be one of the people who would hesitate about having one, national, independent jurisdiction. My reason, though, has more to do with us as Americans than a fear of absolute power corrupting. I don't think anyone would argue with the idea that Russia, Greece, Serbia, etc., have done very well with one national jurisdiction. It would be great if we one day could do the same. (And, let me add that I don't have a strong preference as to where it comes from: continued development of the OCA or Antioch, Moscow or the EP -- I'm there. If asked to vote though, I might nominate development under the Jerusalem Patriarch.)

But, I also think we in the US have demonstrated a talent for tinkering with religion that is as impressive as it is troubling. The drift toward apostasy in a dozen protestant denominations has all been fueled by Americans, and I have heard it said that American RCism tends to differ from elsewhere in the world. I hate to think that we could get a national jurisdiction and decide that we could "improve" it. That would seem to be a real danger to me.

But the flip side to that is jurisdiction shopping, and that is as dangerous as any heretical patriarch. How many protestant churches did each of us go through on the way to Orthodoxy? Didn't we learn anything from that? People change churches for a great range of reasons, many of which are silly or self serving. Barring a Council of Florence type situation, I would argue that we need to bloom where we are planted. Are you in a parish? Absent something truely extraordinary, stay there, or else we run the risk of simply making Orthodoxy a species of protestantism.

2. As far as the EP goes, did you read the speech and the interview? What did he say in those documents that threatened to sell out the faith? :scratch: Or more to the point, how is looking for conspiracies and judging a Patriarch aiding your quest for theosis? Remember, Mount Athos is also under the EP, and I haven't heard anyone suggesting they are un-Orthodox. You don't have to like Bartholomew, but there is a point where you can go too far in judging the actions of someone we don't even know.

James
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.