I just started reading "The Engine of Complexity" by John E Mayfield. I'm only a few pages into it, but he seems to take a similar position that randomness can, in a sense, design things. What caught my attention is that it seems he is trying to return the word "purpose" to discussions about evolution.
I don't know his religious/philosophical views, so I don't know what motivates that. It's not what drew me to the book, but I thought it was interesting. If anyone cares, it was the "evolution as computation" subtitle that intrigued me. I've seen a few debates in the professional literature recently regarding whether evolution is determined or not. It's interesting the circles in which we orbit. Over time a seeming place for randomness has crept into my thinking (though not as evolution would use it*) while a few biologists here and there continue to play with determinism.
* As a further footnote, gluadys, I'll note that your explanation of the TE view of randomness in our past discussion was most helpful.