A Question to Evolutionists

[Alunyel]

What is "fake" about Darwin's teachings? Is something "fake" if you don't like it?

I'd say that's pretty much how it works with Av.

 

[peadar1987]

That's right --- you do.

That Book keeps kooks away.

What if a kook wrote a book?

 

[CoderHead]

Hey, if God actually manifesting Himself won't cut it, I suppose a Book won't, eh?

Who said it wouldn't? Of course, the lowly carpenter's son teaching on the Old Testament laws and dying on purpose is kind of...subtle? Obscure? Unconvincing? Confusing? Maybe all of the above.

I'm all for a physical manifestation that everyone in the world can experience with their five senses, leaving no doubt. That really shouldn't be too much to ask of an omnipotent, benevolent being. The book thing is, to be honest, beneath an all-powerful deity. It's too open to interpretation and way too easily used for evil. A benevolent god wouldn't allow that - especially when it's His Word.

I'm saying that, thanks to the Bible, Mohammad was exposed as a false prophet, Joseph Smith was exposed as a false prophet, and I know you're not going to like this, but Darwin's teachings are exposed as a fake as well.

Thanks to the Bible? I'm not sure I'm following you. How were these "false prophets" unveiled by the Bible? If that's really the case, why do they still have followers/believers? As for Darwin...well, we already know that "science can take a hike," right?

 

[Seeker63]

What would make me a YEC?

.....maybe empirical evidence for the Flood

.....Precambrian bunnies? That might do the trick

.....if the Creator manifested (poofed) in front me - yeah, I would be convinced