As it must be by the very definition of "creationist".
The very act of humanity being created from a previous life form only by naturalistic mechanism is creationism.
And your use of the definitions has been soundly refuted. Your definition of Darwinism doesn't mention creation or creationism.
The definition of Darwinism addresses the question of how humanity was created from a single life form from long long ago.
From Wikipedia.....
"all species of organisms arise and develop through the natural selection of small, inherited variations"
Your use of the definition for "creation" to support the "creationism" portion of the phrase had be shown to be inappropriate and contrived.
It seems to be your position that it's "inappropriate and contrived", but in actuality it's simply recognizing the fact that humanity was created where humanity did not exist before the inherently atheistic process of Darwinist creationism created humanity.
At least my definition actually fit the words in the phrase.
You have been shown time and again that teaching the mechanisms and evidence for evolution and common descent is not the same as telling students "there is no God".
You can continue with your attempt to change the issue to common descent, but the issue is going to remain the same. How was humanity created. In the classrooms today, the students are taught that they are the creation, the result, the product of only, completely, totally, solely naturalistic processes acting on a single life form from long long ago. Their creator, their existence is only, completely, totally, solely a random, mindless, meaningless, purposeless (other than procreation) and directionless mechanism.
If it were the same, then teaching auto mechanics would have to be inherently atheistic. Spare me your claim that I am trying to deflect the discussion from evolution.
You're continually attempting to divert the issue from creationism.
Then it's a good thing the atheistic view is not taught in school.
But it is taught in school, per my post above.
Has science found some evidence of God's, or other entity's hand in evolution?
Has science found evidence that humanity is totally, completely, solely, totally the creation of naturalistic mechanisms acting on a single life form from long long ago? Not at all. Nothing. Zero.
If not, then why should children be taught that there is some impetus other than the mechanisms thus far identified?
The question is, why should they be taught a creationist theory without any evidence for the creationist theory?
You're not pushing for the U.S. public school system to teach that there is a God, are you? That would be unconstitutional.
I'm pushing for the educational system to drop the creationist viewpoint of Darwinist creationism.
No it's not. That's an attempt to insult science, the theory of evolution, and those who agree with the evidence. You have no support for your use of the term, "creationism", either by dictionary definition or colloquialism.
You have no evidence that humanity was created only, solely, totally, completely by naturalistic mechanisms.
Yes, you have repeatedly posted your contrived use of terminology that doesn't fit the definitions you are using.
Your single-minded derisive view, held only by you.
Which you want taught in school. What next? Why don't we take all the children away from the non-Christian parents and send them to church?
How about focusing on what's occurring even as we discuss this. The atheist agenda is taking children and teaching a Godless creationist viewpoint to them as truth, as fact, as the only creationist viewpoint allowed to be taught.
Better yet, let's simply "convince" non-Christians that they need to believe on Christ. We could employ a bunch of people for just that purpose...even give them special uniforms. I like the colors scarlet and black. What d'ya think?
I think you're reverting to a very very common behavior seen on the forum by the Darwinist camp when they can't control the conversation. Ridicule. Mockery.
You have been shown evidence and even been offered more evidence if you would show that you knew what evidence was. Your reply? "Nuh-uh, that's not evidence!"
Your simple denial of the evidence presented to you show this statement to be completely false. Additionally, in my opinion, you know it is false, yet you throw it into your reply anyway.
There's not been on whit of evidence given for the creationist view that humanity is only, totally, completely, solely the result of naturalistic mechanisms acting on a life form from long long ago.
What is very common is the attempt to respond with an effort to change the focus from that to another issue within the Darwinist worldview.
My decision is to treat the institution of Christianity and its adherents with some respect.
Right. And this is respectful?.......
"Better yet, let's simply "convince" non-Christians that they need to believe on Christ. We could employ a bunch of people for just that purpose...even give them special uniforms. I like the colors scarlet and black. What d'ya think?"
And this is just a mild example of the typical mockery, ridicule and personal attacks on Christians who hold a different creationist view than the atheistic creationist view.
I try to do that despite my disagreements with their beliefs, although some people take mere disagreement as an insult. I am not always successful.
This isn't "mere disagreement".....
"Better yet, let's simply "convince" non-Christians that they need to believe on Christ. We could employ a bunch of people for just that purpose...even give them special uniforms. I like the colors scarlet and black. What d'ya think?"
Your continued use of a term that has been revealed to you as insulting to a group of people on this forum shows that it was your intent to insult them. One wonders what that event 26 years ago actually accomplished besides providing you with a sense of superiority and self-righteousness.
I'm sorry if some take it as an insult, it's not used insultingly, it's not used derisively, it's used to present a certain creationist viewpoint which I've explained over and over.