Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
No, those three letters just make it a totally different word. Your attempt to use "creationism" inaccurately only shows that you have been a very dishonest person. Now I don't mind debating with creationists. I do get mad at dishonest creationists especially when their own religion tells you not to be dishonest.
Why in this debate is it the atheists that practically never lie? There are some honest Christians but they tend to be on the evolution side.
No, those three letters just make it a totally different word. Your attempt to use "creationism" inaccurately only shows that you have been a very dishonest person. Now I don't mind debating with creationists. I do get mad at dishonest creationists especially when their own religion tells you not to be dishonest.
Why in this debate is it the atheists that practically never lie? There are some honest Christians but they tend to be on the evolution side.
What!!!??Who's being dishonest? Example, please.
What!!!??
You are.
And I just gave you an example.
I would suggest that you reread my last post about ten times.
It's not dishonest to identify the creationist view of Darwinism as creationism. The 'ism' suffix denotes a certain viewpoint of creation and in the example of Darwinism, it's an inherently atheistic view that all of life was created solely by naturalistic mechanisms. It's a creation-ism viewpoint.
It's not dishonest to identify the creationist view of Darwinism as creationism. The 'ism' suffix denotes a certain viewpoint of creation and in the example of Darwinism, it's an inherently atheistic view that all of life was created solely by naturalistic mechanisms. It's a creation-ism viewpoint.
Wrong, even you know it is dishonest.
I will let you think about your sin for a while.
I could also point out how when we first met you made a deal and then reneged on it.
Of course the rarest creature in the world is an honest creationist.
Do you seriously think that you can debate honestly? If you want respect it is the only way to go.
I'll continue to present the concept of Darwinist creationism and you continue to make your usual personal attacks, if that makes you feel better about yourself. This seems to be the method of 'discussion' you're most comfortable with. Doesn't really matter to me.
I'll continue to present the concept of Darwinist creationism and you continue to make your usual personal attacks, if that makes you feel better about yourself. This seems to be the method of 'discussion' you're most comfortable with. Doesn't really matter to me.
Then the word commune and Communism mean the same thing
You have been unwilling to admit that Darwinist Creationism as you call it, is your personal invention. Are you willing to admit that now?
Communism is the form of adherence to a commune type of living. Creationism is a form of adherence to a viewpoint of creation.
com·mune1
ˈkämˌyo͞on/
noun
1.
a group of people living together and sharing possessions and responsibilities.
com·mu·nism
[kom-yuh-niz-uhm] Show IPA
noun
1.
a theory or system of social organization based on the holding of all property in common, actual ownership being ascribed to the community as a whole or to the state.
I admit that Darwinism has a view of creationism in it's belief system, thus Darwinist creationism.
It's interesting to watch the anger and malice from those who embrace Darwinist creationism yet deny it exists.
You cannot seriously be comparing a group of people living together with a method of government as if they mean the same thing.
I'll continue to present the concept of Darwinist creationism and you continue to make your usual personal attacks, if that makes you feel better about yourself. This seems to be the method of 'discussion' you're most comfortable with. Doesn't really matter to me.
Don't forget there is an Ignore feature. Instead of being tempted to respond to petty insults, it's better not to waste your time reading them in the first place.
Don't forget there is an Ignore feature. Instead of being tempted to respond to petty insults, it's better not to waste your time reading them in the first place.
No, you just don't like it when people point out you are incorrect and misrepresenting and you play victim.
Now, lets see how honest you can be:
Do you admit that what you call; Darwinist Creationism, is your personal invention?
Lets see what you are made of.
It's a difference between disagreement and mockery, ridicule and personal attacks on the individual, all which are typical of those who oppose those who embrace a theistic view of creation. The behavior of those who oppose those who embrace theistic creation has anger a common part of their behavior on the forum. Each person decides how to react to opposition, to disagreement.
I'm made of the stuff which disagrees respectfully and doesn't use ridicule, malice or personal attacks in my behavior toward those who might have a different viewpoint than me. I've explained my position and the basis for the term 'Darwinist creationism' and will continue to use it in discussions. If you don't accept or like it, I suggest you refrain from discussing the concept with me.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?