- Dec 25, 2003
- 42,070
- 16,820
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Private
Theodor1 was the latest and he got shot out of here on the 27th of Sept. Look for a join date of the 27th or 28th.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Is that supposed to mean something?
P.S.: Your typing errors are writing style are strangely familiar.
Either English is not your mother tongue or you have not had formal training in the language. A change in trait is a change in the organism and the organism will remain the same species as per ToE.I thought you understood that a change in a trait does not change the organism. It remains he exact same species as it parents. You know it that old "after its kind" thing that gives the evos such a problem.
You are not making any sense!We don't need that kind of an example. "After its kind" disproves evolution. That is what we can see and repeat. which more than you can do.
Science has come a long way since the horse drawn carriage!How silly. I probably heard of him while you still had training wheels on your bike.
I am sure that even you are able to use the spell check. Stop being lazy!Are you here to discuss our differencnes or are you trying to get a job with the typo police.
I thought you understood that a change in a trait does not change the organism. It remains he exact same species as it parents. You know it that old "after its kind" thing that gives the evos such a problem.
We don't need that kind of an example. "After its kind" disproves evolution. That is what we can see and repeat. which more than you can do.
How silly. I probably heard of him while you still had training wheels on your bike.
Are you here to discuss our differencnes or are you trying to get a job with the typo police.
I thought you understood that a change in a trait does not change the organism. It remains he exact same species as it parents. You know it that old "after its kind" thing that gives the evos such a problem.
We don't need that kind of an example. "After its kind" disproves evolution. That is what we can see and repeat. which more than you can do.
I thought you understood that a change in a trait does not change the organism. It remains he exact same species as it parents.
You know it that old "after its kind" thing that gives the evos such a problem.
We don't need that kind of an example. "After its kind" disproves evolution.
Good thing you stopped there else he would have a brain seizureThe common ancestor of humans and chimps was a primate. We are still in the primate kind.
The common ancestor of humans and bears was a mammal. We are still in the mammal kind.
The common ancestor of trout and humans was a jawed vertebrate. We are still in the jawed vertebrate kind.
Where is the problem again?
When a scientific theory is altered does this mean the theory has changed?"Alter" means "change."
When a scientific theory is altered does this mean the theory has changed?
Was evolution theory ever altered? Did it change into a different theory?
When a scientific theory is altered does this mean the theory has changed?
Was evolution theory ever altered?
Did it change into a different theory?
Hide?Hahahaha......what a joke....! You have the hide to call that " logical"...!?
It's a scientific claim.Premise 1: Energy has no cause. Where is your evidence for this claim....?
The universe was formed from energy, eternal energy that can neither be created nor destroyed, but can only change forms.Premise 2: God is pure energy. Where is your evidence for this claim.....?
Yes.
Not as dramatically as when Einstein's Relativity replaced Newton's mechanics, but yes.
But it's true.Hogwash!
But it's also true.Even more hogwash.
Those are observations.Must you keep making things up to suit your claims?
Why am I continuously bearing false witnesses?Why are you continuously bearing false witness?
Of course.Don't you respect your religion that forbids bearing false witness?
Talking about hypocrisy doesn't make it so.Talk about hypocrisy!!!
When a scientific theory is altered does this mean the theory has changed?
Was evolution theory ever altered? Did it change into a different theory?
Evolution does not predict a crocoduck. You have a misconception of what evolution is.
Either English is not your mother tongue or you have not had formal training in the language. A change in trait is a change in the organism and the organism will remain the same species as per ToE. <<
I have found when someone does not have the intellectual capability to defened what they say, they resort to insults.
If you ever get the training wheels off, get back to me.
Either English is not your mother tongue or you have not had formal training in the language. A change in trait is a change in the organism and the organism will remain the same species as per ToE. <<
I have found when someone does not have the intellectual capability to defened what they say, they resort to insults.
If you ever get the training wheels off, get back to me.
Do you know what projection is......?
Instead of pretending that using the word "alter" instead of the word "change" answers our questions, how about describing the nature of the barrier that allows a mutation in the gene to alter a trait but does not allow a mutation of the gene to create a new trait. The people who work with genetic matreial (DNA) cannot find such a barrier.Take and albino. The mutation cause a change in the skin and eyes. The mutation did not give the albino the skin and eyes, it simply ALTERED those traits.
Please explain how "after its kind" disproves evolution when evolution relies on "after its kind."
Not true. Evolution says at some point in the life span, the species will evolve into something other than what it started out as. After its kind say it will not. If what you are saying is true, the universe would still be that simple-celled blob that came out of the primordial soup.
You cannot tell me what the second, third, fourth, fifth etc life forms were but you have me belteive that first one is responsible or all the animal and plant life we have today. Do yuo really not see how unscientific that is?
Of course there is always the possibility that thatg you know what theose life form were and a biological explanation as to how they became somehing more than what they were.
What about its great, great, grandparents, or its cousins? What is stopping the accumulation of different mutations in different populations from producing two populations that can no longer produce fertile offspring? We have already seen that horses and donkeys can no longer produce fertile offspring.
The common ancestor of humans and chimps was a primate. We are still in the primate kind.
The common ancestor of humans and bears was a mammal. We are still in the mammal kind.
The common ancestor of trout and humans was a jawed vertebrate. We are still in the jawed vertebrate kind
Where is the problem again?
It may have happened, you just have no evidence thatg any mutation has evere caused a change in the species. All you have is necessary speculation.
Which primate came first? If chimps are our cmmon ancestor, why is our DNA different? Why can't we mate with them and bear offsprsing? Lemers are also primates, why are they not our common ancester?
Where is your evidence? Why is our DNA different than that of ALL other primates.
Talk is cheap, How about some evidence
The problem for you is that DNA proves you wrong.
But it's true.
But it's also true.
They just dont admit it.
Those are observations.
Why am I continuously bearing false witnesses?
Of course.
My religion also encourages bearing false witnesses.
Talking about hypocrisy doesn't make it so.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?