Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
A president attacking a sovereign nation
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ana the Ist" data-source="post: 74648077" data-attributes="member: 302807"><p>Sure....if for some reason the fact that he organized, funded, and planned terrorist attacks against Americans wasn't justification enough...I suppose it would make sense to talk about the previous choices that didn't work out....you know, as kong as you're not worried about being perceived as an idiot who doesn't know what he's doing. </p><p></p><p>Of course, the flipside of that is if people don't believe killing him is justified because of all his terrorist actions....what possibly would justify it?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That's a misleading title </p><p></p><p>He spoke about not needing a "criminal conviction" to begin impeachment proceedings. He's correct. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You're right that no one could have planned on them shooting down a airliner. I disagree regarding the general though...he was widely considered their best strategist and he was key to their entire strategy in middle east. </p><p></p><p>If we had killed a different general, and Soleimani was still alive, I doubt they would have shot down a passenger plane. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>What ideals are you referring to? We regularly use drone to target and kill terrorists and terrorist leaders.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ana the Ist, post: 74648077, member: 302807"] Sure....if for some reason the fact that he organized, funded, and planned terrorist attacks against Americans wasn't justification enough...I suppose it would make sense to talk about the previous choices that didn't work out....you know, as kong as you're not worried about being perceived as an idiot who doesn't know what he's doing. Of course, the flipside of that is if people don't believe killing him is justified because of all his terrorist actions....what possibly would justify it? That's a misleading title He spoke about not needing a "criminal conviction" to begin impeachment proceedings. He's correct. You're right that no one could have planned on them shooting down a airliner. I disagree regarding the general though...he was widely considered their best strategist and he was key to their entire strategy in middle east. If we had killed a different general, and Soleimani was still alive, I doubt they would have shot down a passenger plane. What ideals are you referring to? We regularly use drone to target and kill terrorists and terrorist leaders. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
A president attacking a sovereign nation
Top
Bottom