S
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
A FEDERAL department failed to check whether an Aboriginal group, named by the Hillsong church in a grant application, supported the project.
The church's charitable arm, Hillsong Emerge, has been stripped of a $414,479 federal grant after claims that it obtained the funds by deceiving the Aboriginal community that was supposed to benefit from it.
Hillsong Emerge first applied for a grant of almost $500,000 with the support of the Riverstone Aboriginal Community Association, in Sydney's northwestern suburbs.
It withdrew the application and submitted a second, which led to its being granted $414,479 in August last year - a grant announced by John Howard.
But the second grant application used letters of support and ideas from RACA, allegedly without the permission of the indigenous body.
Attorney-General's Department assistant secretary Dianne Heriot told a Senate estimates hearing yesterday that the department looked for evidence of local partnerships with indigenous groups.
But asked by Labor senator Trish Crossin whether the reference letters were verified in some way, Dr Heriot said: "We accept the letters, Senator."
Dr Heriot said other checks were undertaken on the eligibility of the organisation, the nature of the project, local need and previous applications for funding.
The hearing was told the department became aware of problems with the grant application through gossip, and asked for a meeting with Hillsong and its partners in the project.
A meeting in October revealed that RACA was disenchanted with the project, and the next month NSW state Labor MP Ian West claimed in parliament that Hillsong Emerge misused the Riverstone Aboriginal community to get taxpayers' money for its own purposes.
When Hillsong Emerge did not reply to two letters from the department in December and January querying whether the project could be delivered, a decision was made to withdraw the grant on February 1.
RACA spokeswoman Vilma Ryan said the events in federal parliament showed Hillsong Emerge "can't be trusted to work with indigenous communities". "The federal Government needs to explain why it never checked up on statements made in the Hillsong Emerge application.
"We call on Hillsong Emerge to come clean on this whole matter. Come on, Hillsong Emerge. What's the story? Are you big enough to apologise?"
A spokeswoman for Hillsong did not return calls.
AAP, Ean Higgins
The Hillsong Church's benevolent arm has been dumped from a second federal funding relationship amid claims it spent indigenous development grants on itself, rather than on the Aboriginal entrepreneurs for whom it was intended.
Indigenous Business Australia (IBA) has announced it would cease funding a "micro-enterprise development" program that paid Hillsong Emerge $965,421 to administer $280,000 in loans, The Australian newspaper reports.
The news comes after Hillsong Emerge was stripped of a $414,479 grant for crime prevention after claims it obtained the funds by deceiving the Aboriginal community that was supposed to benefit from it.
NSW Labor MP Ian West said IBA's decision to stop funding the program was "a good start".
"IBA and taxpayers shouldn't fund Hillsong's hubs either - we should ask for our money back," he was quoted as saying.
Hillsong spokeswoman Maria Ieroianni told the paper Hillsong Emerge respected IBA's decision to terminate the funding relationship.
grateful heart said:Hi there
I can shed light of it
Seeing I know the head of Emerge i think i can shed some light on the subject, Money has not been misused at all unfortunately as you know certain media and political types like to stretch the truth and some are out right lies.
Aboriginal housing pulled out on a total unrelated issue and because the application for the grant included them in the proposal. Emerge had to pull it because it would be unethical to continue so they withdrew it it wasnt used to pay salaries.
the indenginous body changed its mind and wanted more for other things that the application didnt cater for , then the quarreling began, thats when the media took it out of proportion,
Hillsong Church funds Emerge not the other way around, ask any local about what the Church has done in the community, the fact that our Church has NEVER been graffitied says something, if you want i can post the official churches response if you like but i do know more than the average person becuase im good friends with them, does this make sense?
Why then did Hillsong get dumped by the Government???grateful heart said:Ahhhh Jim of course you would post here , im sure you hate Hillsong more than Lucifer himself , if anyone wants to know more PM me as i know the full true story but i know anything i put here Jim will attack it no matter how truthful it is .........
They didnt get dumped they pulled out of it because they had toWhy then did Hillsong get dumped by the Government???
exwitchoz said:Such an approach and response as given so far certainly doesn't convince me that there is no fire under all the smoke... In fact it makes me deeply suspicious that there IS "something rotten in the state of Denmark" after all...
Church 'spent indigenous grants on staff'
By Ean Higgins
The Australian
February 13, 2006
INDIGENOUS development grants to Hillsong's benevolent arm have gone almost entirely to employing and providing offices for church staff, with only a trickle reaching Aborigines.
In one case, Hillsong Emerge spent $315,000 in federal funds employing seven of its own staff in Sydney to administer a "micro-credit" project that made only six loans to Aborigines worth an average of $2856 each.
Hillsong also failed to enable a single Aborigine to become self-employed under a $610,968 federal grant to encourage indigenous entrepreneurship.
The revelations are contained in answers from senator Eric Abetz, representing Employment Minister Kevin Andrews, to a detailed series of questions on notice from Labor's indigenous affairs spokesman, Chris Evans.
They show that far more funds are spent on Hillsong staffers and administration than actual service delivery. One federal grant paid $965,421 to Hillsong Emerge to administer $280,000 in loan funds.
Senator Abetz said that when it came to the $610,968 Hillsong Emerge received to run indigenous "enterprise hubs" in Redfern and Mount Druitt in Sydney, Hillsong had advised that "to their knowledge, none of those assisted have moved to full self-employment".
When The Australian visited the Redfern "enterprise hub" in December, it found flyers in the foyer encouraging local businesses to pay up to $1800 to advertise in the Christian Business Directory published by Hillsong Emerge, but no information on how Hillsong could help Aborigines.
The $610,968 grant was approved in just three weeks, and Hillsong faced no competition since it was the only applicant.
Labor figures have expressed suspicions about the grants and the Liberal Party's links with Hillsong.
Liberal MP Louise Markus, a Hillsong church member and former Hillsong Emerge officer who narrowly won the outer Sydney seat of Greenway from Labor at the last election with the help of Hillsong Church members, wrote a letter of support for a separate $414,000 grant.
The Federal Government will come under further pressure this week, with the Opposition planning to grill it over Hillsong at Senate estimates hearings.
Senator Evans yesterday told The Australian that the micro-credit program, "has so far been deeply flawed in its execution".
"If the Government's agenda is to help disadvantaged indigenous Australians start their own businesses then Hillsong needs to be held accountable for what is, on the face of it, a very poor outcome," he said. Senator Evans said there had been "no transparent, public evaluation of the pilot program - just academic articles before it began and Hillsong promotional material".
A portion of the $610,968 grant was devoted to Hillsong's Shine program, an activity directly associated with Hillsong Church.
In Senator Abetz's answers, he said part of the Shine Basic program "focuses on values of worth, strength and purpose" and includes "journalling", described by the senator as "writing down dreams, goals, plans".
Hillsong Emerge has repeatedly refused to answer questions about its indigenous development programs.
Yesterday, spokeswoman Maria Ieroianni referred all questions to the federal body responsible for administering the grants, Indigenous Business Australia.
IBA's deputy general manager, Ian Myers, said the funds covered pilot programs, that the programs had been reviewed, and that a decision would be taken by IBA's board as to whether to proceed with further funding.
grateful heart said:They didnt get dumped they pulled out of it because they had to
The Australian Feb 14....
But answering questions on notice from Opposition indigenous affairs spokesman Chris Evans, Senator Ellison said the offer of the grant - announced in August with some fanfare by Mr Howard - had been axed.
Senator Ellison said his department had recently asked Hillsong Emerge for "details of how the partnership proposed for the project would operate". "On 1 February, 2006, the department wrote to Hillsong Emerge Ltd advising them theoffer has been withdrawn," hesaid. A spokeswoman for Senator Ellison said the department had withdrawn the offer because Hillsong was "unable to deliver the project as originally proposed".
RACA spokeswoman Vilma Ryan says Hillsong Emerge owes her organisation a public apology.
"They didn't think we had a brain in our head," she said.
"But we've been in the game a long time now and we've been fighting all this kind of crap for years - you know being used and abused and researched."
She says her organisation was misled.
"They've treated us unjustly, they've used us and used all of our ideas and we don't take kindly to that," she said.
That is because i have asked them not to reply on the posts and post anything, i have answered 99% of all questions i have receivedGH,
I'm deeply suspecious that not even one person has admitted that your claim is genuine.
And also, no one has actually posted out, saying your claim is inadequate.
Have you been replying those PMs?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?