A must watch for atheists!

[Kylie]

Thank you for making my point for me!

Watch the video, more like listen to it. Investigate scientific experiments mentioned, examine the claim…. No, you would rather stay in your religious bubble and refuse to do so!

Thank you for showing me, yet again, just how profoundly fanatical are followers of religion of atheism!

How is that fanaticism?

 

[Sedoy]

How is that fanaticism?

Because atheists run like cockroaches from any challenge to their beliefs. This topic is the clearest indication I have seen in a while. Any possible, well worn out excuse is used and you used every one of them.

 

[JGG]

Because atheists run like cockroaches from any challenge to their beliefs. This topic is the clearest indication I have seen in a while. Any possible, well worn out excuse is used and you used every one of them.

Even if that were true, how is that an indication of fanaticism?

 

[Kylie]

Because atheists run like cockroaches from any challenge to their beliefs. This topic is the clearest indication I have seen in a while. Any possible, well worn out excuse is used and you used every one of them.

Are you serious? By this logic, if I was to similarly dismiss an argument that 2+2=5, you would claim that I was a fanatic of the 2+2=4 group of people!

Like I said before, if you have some evidence, give me a summary. I'm not going to waste three hours of my life listening to the same claptrap I've seen refuted a thousand times before.

 

[SpyderByte]

Meaning what? That you fell asleep in the first five minutes and never did get to a part where clear scientific evidence proves that your whole worldview is nothing more then a dream?

Nah, its just boring. Period.

 

[WanderingBloom]

​

This article synopsizes the video that would accompany it.
Do you think Sungenis would dare make an argument for flat earth theory too?

Geocentrism Disproved: How Newton's Laws Prove the Earth Orbits the Sun
Ken Cole and Robert Sungenis Dialogue​

Summary Notes:
Basically, the idea behind Section A of this proof is that we know Newton’s Laws are right since we’ve successfully sent spacecraft through the solar system -- we know how gravity works. We know that very massive objects have a greater gravitational pull than less massive objects. Particularly of note: Newton’s Laws squarely contradict Geocentrism. In order for the moon to orbit the earth, for example, the earth has to be much more massive than the moon. That’s the only way the earth can create a big enough gravitational pull to “hang on” to the moon.
That is why the earth can’t be the center of the universe according to Newton’s Laws: the earth would have to be more massive than every other object in the universe, so it could have a big enough gravitational pull on to “hang on” to everything. Robert Sungenis wants to believe that Geocentrism and Newton’s Laws pleasantly coexist, but Section B of this proof clearly shows that either Newton is right or Geocentrism is right.
Section C of this proof shows that by Robert Sungenis’ own standard of “proof,” Newton’s Laws are true and Geocentrism must be false.

 

[Kylie]

​

This article synopsizes the video that would accompany it.
Do you think Sungenis would dare make an argument for flat earth theory too?

So the video is saying, "the Earth is not at the center of the universe, therefore atheism is wrong?" Honestly, I don't see how this conclusion follows from the premises. And you quoted a summary of the article that summarizes the video. Care to give a link to the actual article?