- Oct 16, 2015
- 12,300
- 6,472
- 29
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Faith
- Deist
- Marital Status
- Single
This is in response to the attempt at a thread of the laws of science vs the laws of God, and I think that it's an example of a big problem that a lot of people make regarding science. It'll be short and sweet though.
Simply put: science is descriptive, not prescriptive.
Science does not say a thing happens because it HAS TO BE. Science says a thing happens because that's what happens, and that's what the laws of science are. They are descriptions of how the world works based on observation and study.
The best example being the law of physics which says that no two objects can occupy the same space simultaneously. If you've ever seen a car crash, you get a good example of that, or if you're like me and was hit by a car at a young age, you'll know that fact very intimately (according to an observer, I went six feet in the air and eight feet across the ground).
All science does is describe what it sees in the world around us, and then, depending on discipline, it will break what was observed down into various parts to explain exactly how some things happened. Yes, there is a predictive power to it, but that is not the same as going "THOU MUST DO THIS!" as a lot of people seem to think science does. All the predictions do is say "Based on what we've seen, there is a likelihood that following this course of action will result in this outcome."
That's all there is to it.
Simply put: science is descriptive, not prescriptive.
Science does not say a thing happens because it HAS TO BE. Science says a thing happens because that's what happens, and that's what the laws of science are. They are descriptions of how the world works based on observation and study.
The best example being the law of physics which says that no two objects can occupy the same space simultaneously. If you've ever seen a car crash, you get a good example of that, or if you're like me and was hit by a car at a young age, you'll know that fact very intimately (according to an observer, I went six feet in the air and eight feet across the ground).
All science does is describe what it sees in the world around us, and then, depending on discipline, it will break what was observed down into various parts to explain exactly how some things happened. Yes, there is a predictive power to it, but that is not the same as going "THOU MUST DO THIS!" as a lot of people seem to think science does. All the predictions do is say "Based on what we've seen, there is a likelihood that following this course of action will result in this outcome."
That's all there is to it.