- Jul 22, 2014
- 41,547
- 7,866
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
If you're saying that new is better than old, please replace your KJV with an ESV or CSB.
If you're saying that old is better than new, please replace your KJV with the Greek and Hebrew.
The Modern Translations are actually based on the supposedly older and better manuscripts (The codex Sinaiticus and codex Vaticanus). One manuscript was brought forth from an Orthodox monastery, and the other from a Catholic vault. Then it was translated under the guidance of two men (Westcott and Hort) who were into the occult. The occult new age agenda can be subtly seen in Modern Bibles.
I don't believe it is a coincidence that the the first Modern Translation to meet with success and or popularity (the NIV in 1973) also just happened to line up with the an explosion of the New Age movement in the 70's. In other words, when men moved away from the authority of God's Word (the KJV), things got more dark spiritually.
The King James is in the New Language (English) and not in the old dead languages (Biblical Hebrew, and Biblical Greek). But there are those who say the old is better.
Last edited:
Upvote
0