The article I posted was in relation to a theory I had read that postulated that desegregation was the principal motivator in the Religious Right's 40-year strategic alliance with the Republican Party, and that the "sexual sins" that were long presumed to be the Religious Right's motivation in turning "right" had, in actuality, never bothered them in the 1970's.
This theory, which I mentioned without stating whether I agreed with it or not, can perhaps explain the 300 plus voter suppression bills filed by the Republican Party after the 2020 election.
The "sexual sin" you alluded to is a very minor part of the article, notable only by the statement that it was not a motivator in the partnership of the Religious Right and the Republican Party-- and without any mention whatsoever of its rightness or wrongness.
Please note that I also expressed no opinion, pro-or-con, on that minor part of the story.
I stated the theory, and when someone expressed hearty skepticism about it, I decided to share the article where I had read about the theory.