Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Gamblers fallacy is for the people that use chance to prove their point.
No but we need a Fine Tuned Machine that was made to choose a set of numbers once in a week. The Lotto numbers are a deterministic event that is is determined by the Lotto Machine, this machine doesn't choose words or hieroglyphics but only numbers because someone intended to have the lotto tickets only filled with numbers.
Long story short you haven't read the article.
You used the lottery argument, this lotto machine points to a winner only if he filled his ticket with numbers numbers and not etc with letters therefor there was a structure to have a winner. Also if an event is Deterministic it points to a structure, i don't think that a pregnant woman will ever give birth to a Dinosaur.
Criminologists use Science to understand if a crime was intended to happen or if it was an accident. Same here. I use Science that is neutral to questions about existence to prove you that the Universe was intended to happen and it was not an accident.
since the Universe is not a Random Mistake and couldn't be created by itself it points to a Transcendental cause,
That's the Texas Sharpshooter fallacy. The odds of this universe existing are 1 in 1, because it exists.
You have no evidence for a deity creating anything, so no rescuing is needed.
And still no evidence for a fine tuner.
Humans appearing out of nothing is what creationists believe in, as in creatio ex nihilo.
Your fallacy is "begging the question". You are inserting your conclusion in the premsies.
You need to support this claim before inserting it into the premises.
Same question on this thread:
To prove fine tuning you need to show that laws and constants have been altered from their original values. Can you do this?
So, please take moment and highlight that part about the evidence.A Creator is an intelligent conscious Mind that creates because He has intention to create (I think that we agree that intention exists only in intelligent conscious beings), since the Universe is not a Random Mistake and couldn't be created by itself it points to a Transcendental cause, does this Transcendental cause demands a Mind? Yes because it was a Deterministic event and you can't have a Deterministic event from a Random Event when only Randomness exists, this is accepted also by atheists but insted of God they use the Multiverse Hypothesis, an eternal machine that creates Universes Randomly. The 2 choices that Atheists have are Chance and Physical Necessity. Physical necessity automatically is destroyed because BVG Theorem proved that the Universe demands a physical beginning and chance faces the Boltzmann Brain problem.
Now prove me that Randomness Nothingness and Luck exist.
Which is exactly what you are attempting to do. You are making the claim that the universe existing is too improbable.
Again, you fail to understand how analogies are used.
I have. Random sequences produce functional RNA molecules.
You still fail to understand how analogies are used.
How many times have criminologists found that a deity caused anything to happen?
That doesn't answer why the Universe exists, it just ends the argument on the beginning of the Universe.
Scientists are not deities.
You said it, Fine Tuner, the Fine Tuning exists therefor there must be a Tuner, Chance or Physical Necessity can't help you.
I am not a Catholic and since God exists there was not Nothing.
I can look around and see the Universe, i have the live proof of a Creation around me.
So, please take moment and highlight that part about the evidence.
Based on Bayesian analysis, we have an example of a universe, so probability is 1. Also based on Bayesian analysis, we have no prior of a god/s. So, what was that you were saying about gods and randomness again?
The Universe exists because Someone made it.
I understand just fine, its the argument of chance that i have debunked thousands of times here.
Still not a clue for what the article is saying, please read it again.
I understand just fine, your delusional lotto machine also needs fine tuning to choose numbers and not kitties.
Now prove me that you are a Cosmic Mistake without purpose or free will that Nothingness spewed.
Prove me that Chance exists.
Prove me that Randomness exists.
Prove me that Boltzmann Brains exists.
Prove me that Materialism and Reductionism are right.
Prove me that the Universe is Eternal.
Prove me that something out of Nothing can happen just like it happens on the Harry Potter Universe.
The odds of this universe existing are 1 in 1 okay? This doesn't explain if it was intention or randomness, the fact that i woke up this morning and there was breakfast on the table was 1:1 but the breakfast wasn't made by itself, someone made it and put it there.
The odds of this universe existing are 1 in 1 okay? This doesn't explain if it was intention or randomness, the fact that i woke up this morning and there was breakfast on the table was 1:1 but the breakfast wasn't made by itself, someone made it and put it there.
Everything in science can't be tested directly. As someone's example just because he never played Roger Federer in tennis doesn't mean no one can figured out the outcome between him and Federer.
It's not my claim but I have read enough to understand the fine tune argument.
Where have you shown any evidence that a deity caused the Universe to exist?
Where is your evidence demonstrating that God created anything?
Where is your evidence for fine tuning?
Where is your evidence that God created anything?
Where is your evidence that God created the creation around you?
Still nothing objective to support your claims.
I have no problem with you believing that on faith though.
You need to support this claim before inserting it into the premises.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?