You are so funny. You don't even read your own articles. The article that you provided used the data from the USGS to try and prove their point. Not to disprove the USGS. They also used data from Wiki and Dlindquist which also got their data from the USGS.
You'd better go back to school because those grade school kids are brighter than you.
Even a grade school kid could understand what you call gibberish.
Go back to school.
I wasn't explaining away miracles in the sky. I wasn't giving the scientific reason for a natural occurrence. Here, read one of the mainstream sites. I'm sure that you will try and explain NASA away with that lame excuse.
NASA - Total Lunar Eclipse
I certainly do believe that God "can" speak to us through signs in nature but I don't believe that every natural occurrence is a sign. Especially when there isn't anything from scripture which backs it up. A lunar eclipse meant more to the Jews than solar eclipses because the calendar was based on the moon. The important part was that they had to be visible from Jerusalem.
A lunar eclipse which was only visible in another part of the world meant nothing to them.
As far as a red moon, or "blood" scripture says that the sun must be turned into darkness and the moon into blood before the Lord returns, so when you see a total eclipse of the sun and a total eclipse of the moon on the same day which effects Jerusalem,
then you will impress me.
They are not trying to provide a scientific reason, they gave scientific fact as to why the moon appears to be red as the eclipse is waning.
Well, at least you finally said something correct.
Who is doing that?
No, I always side with God but science hasn't disproved God in the slightest manner. Science gives us better understand to the wonders of God. The wonders of creation.
You really don't understand anything about people.
You really don't understand scripture or Christianity. So sad.
