• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

A Disturbing Situation

TheOriginalWhitehorse

Well-Known Member
Sep 1, 2003
2,902
94
19
Visit site
✟26,032.00
Faith
Calvinist

This post, my friend, is a priceless jewel. I was thoroughly refreshed by its simplicity, honesty, and truth.
 
Upvote 0

tcampen

Veteran
Jul 14, 2003
2,704
151
✟26,132.00
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Whitehorse said:
This post, my friend, is a priceless jewel. I was thoroughly refreshed by its simplicity, honesty, and truth.
Still curious, but what part of "The point i'm making is that arguing with a few people who just want to make some fuss and talk in circles and live like educated barbarians is not going to profit you or I." is a jewell? Is it the condescending part? The blatent stereotyping part? Or perhaps it is the gross inaccuracy of the statement itself that makes it such a "jewell"? I'm having some trouble figuring that out?
 
Upvote 0

TheOriginalWhitehorse

Well-Known Member
Sep 1, 2003
2,902
94
19
Visit site
✟26,032.00
Faith
Calvinist
It show why such is really a subjective concept.

Well said.

Well, I wouldn't say it is subjective-there is one truth-I think it's where we look to find that truth. But agreed on the no-force policy. If anyone had the right to force people it would be God, and as the world clearly demonstrates, He does not.

tcampen said:
This beautifully illustrates why it is absurd to allow and rely on men (and women) to make such ultimate determinations and force them on others thru the government or otherwise.

True-never rely on men or women. AMEN!!!!

For it is written:

17:10And the brethren immediately sent away Paul and Silas by night unto Berea: who coming thither went into the synagogue of the Jews.

17:11These were more noble than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so.
Acts 17:11

So you see, the Bible commended the Bereans because they didn't even take the apostle Paul's word for it, but searched the scriptures to test their words.
 
Upvote 0

TheOriginalWhitehorse

Well-Known Member
Sep 1, 2003
2,902
94
19
Visit site
✟26,032.00
Faith
Calvinist

Well, I think it was the simplicity, honesty, and truth.
 
Upvote 0

TheOriginalWhitehorse

Well-Known Member
Sep 1, 2003
2,902
94
19
Visit site
✟26,032.00
Faith
Calvinist

I've never heard a Christian ask someone to take their word for it.

Havoc, I have sin.
 
Upvote 0

TheOriginalWhitehorse

Well-Known Member
Sep 1, 2003
2,902
94
19
Visit site
✟26,032.00
Faith
Calvinist
Havoc said:
I'm sorry to hear that. Must suk for you.

Whether it's todays Christian saying it or whichever Christians wrote the NT it's still the same thing... "trust me, I'm not lieing."

Not really. It's just honesty. .And of course the story doesn't end there.

I would say you need to find it from the Lord, not from man. If I must tell you to take my word for anything, anything at all, I suppose it would be this: no man can ever give you faith in Jesus Christ. It was designed that way.
 
Upvote 0

tcampen

Veteran
Jul 14, 2003
2,704
151
✟26,132.00
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
What if God did speak to me, but revealed a truth that is very different than what you are asserting? Should I trust what you say, or what God says? If I say I trust God, and that does not include the traditional Christian message, you might say that I am being deceived or am mistaken. But that whole premise is based on your interpretation - man's interpretation of God - which you already acknowledged should not be trusted.

In other words, everything you assert is "man's" interpretation of God, and therefore no better than any other person's interpretation. So, I should stick with what God is saying, rather than what you are saying, right?
 
Upvote 0

TheOriginalWhitehorse

Well-Known Member
Sep 1, 2003
2,902
94
19
Visit site
✟26,032.00
Faith
Calvinist

The answer is to sort out truth from falsehood. True, it would appear that God does, but in fact He does not. It's all about sorting it out.

I invite you to consider: Christianity is the only religion that offers atonement for sin.

(Which I understand you believe you have never sinned, not even one time. So if you are not seeking atonement for sin, you will receive precisely what you are seeking.)
 
Upvote 0

TheOriginalWhitehorse

Well-Known Member
Sep 1, 2003
2,902
94
19
Visit site
✟26,032.00
Faith
Calvinist
Diatrive said:
If a supernatural deity does exist, I look at it as a gem with many sides. Each group of people are looking at a different facet of the same gem. Each proclaiming they are the only ones who see the gem.

Hm. Then what would you do with all the contradictions?
 
Upvote 0