Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Just so you know that you're not getting away with that nonsense.You know, all you gotta do is show us how DNA evolved the extreme complex characteristics....
But you refuse to do so.
Why do they think that assumption is correct?
I have...or can you show me an example of a code that didn't have a code maker?
According to Wiki...there is a genetic code.
The genetic code is the set of rules by which information encoded within genetic material (DNA or mRNA sequences) is translated into proteins by living cells. Translation is accomplished by the ribosome, which links amino acids in an order specified by mRNA, using transfer RNA (tRNA) molecules to carry amino acids and to read the mRNA three nucleotides at a time. The genetic code is highly similar among all organisms and can be expressed in a simple table with 64 entries.
It's been shown evolutionism is based upon assumption...and is impossible. That's how.How do you know?
Just so you know that you're not getting away with that nonsense.
As to "extreme complexity," characterize it it terms of Kolmgorov complexity and I'll show you how it is within reach of a continuous-time Markov process like random variation and selection. Here are the equations; go for it.
,![]()
![]()
What??? A looks like B...so B must have evolved from A? That's evidence?As a result of examination of that collection of things that you people run from......evidence.
.
Beep, beep back the truck up...you understand how evolution and abiogenesis and such works???yeah....and? Again we have good evidence it could come about naturally, and once it does, it's just chemistry, you have to show that it can't come naturally, and done nothing but go, "Lalala this isn't possible>" funny how the people researching it don't buy that. Your line of argument fails, because it isn't going to convince anyone that knows even the slightest bit about evolution. That's why you guys wil fail time in and time out, I understand how evolution and abiogenesis and such works, so all your arguments are meaningless to me.
Bats use echolocation too. Did you know that?
What??? A looks like B...so B must have evolved from A? That's evidence?
I just did, but you can't do the math.As you see...it = 0.
Evolutionism fails again.
So, when you get around to showing how evolutionism can evolve such complexity....we'll all be here.
If someone did it would be noble prize material. In the meantime all they can do is complain the genetic code isn't really a code, which it is.Can anyone present a sophisticated information filled code that wasn't written/created with intelligence?
Beep, beep back the truck up...you understand how evolution and abiogenesis and such works???
Really? You undertand abiogenesis???
You understand how evolutiuonism works yet can't explain how mutations add up?
...I have to assume you were joking.
You still haven't shown that it could or did evolve.
Every code known to man has a code maker.
You can claim that to be the truth all you want to....but demonstrating you have the truth is something you need to work on.
Echo-location didn't evolve.
Your problem is demonstrating that so-called beneficials can add up and create such things as a dolphins echo-location system. Once again you assume they can....but never shown how outside of your coloring book version.
Bats use echolocation too. Did you know that?
It's a bit different then a dolphin...then again you did know that. Right?