Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
That sounds like tongues. You should try that in church sometime and see if there is an interpretation!I have read enough to know that I think the Van Tilian approach to epistemology, vie presuppositionalism is unsupportable (IMO). What alternatives are there?
Not familiar with Van Til 's epistemology. I didn't even know he had one, honestly. So I'm not sure what I am about to propose is a true alternative or not.I have read enough to know that I think the Van Tilian approach to epistemology, vie presuppositionalism is unsupportable (IMO). What alternatives are there?
In my discussions with believers, they make appeals to knowledge that I cannot make without sufficient evidence. It seems to me that every conversation concludes with faith as a form of knowledge. I see faith as a conclusion without positive knowledge. Believers seem to lay claim to extra knowledge.Most Christians take the classic approach of knowledge being justified true belief.
The only uniquely Christian element is that if I have a justified true belief that God asserted the proposition P, then I have a justified true belief that P is true.
I have read Aquinas but, he places the text of scripture as evidence. That is circular reasoning. How do I know Jesus rose from the dead--'the Bible says so." How do I know the Bible is reliable?--"Jesus rose from the dead and attests to it." I am a bit incredulous with such reasoning.Not familiar with Van Til 's epistemology. I didn't even know he had one, honestly. So I'm not sure what I am about to propose is a true alternative or not.
When I think of epistemology I think of Jacques Maritain's reflections on Thomas Aquinas in 'Introduction to Philosophy' An Introduction to Philosophy by Jacques Maritain
That is a rather simple introduction but there is some depth to the philosophy of Thomas Aquinas that may be good for you to explore. Guides to Thomistic philosophy include Pieper, Maritain, McInerny, Chesterton, and Gilson. Nothing like reading Thomas in Latin but not everybody can do that. His Summa Theologica and Summa Contra Gentiles are available in English, but before buying one be sure you are getting a translation that works for you. And read either Pieper's or Chesterton's introductions to Thomas so you can get the hang of reading a medieval philosopher with benefit.
A Select Thomistic Bibliography Topically Arranged
In my discussions with believers, they make appeals to knowledge that I cannot make without sufficient evidence. It seems to me that every conversation concludes with faith as a form of knowledge. I see faith as a conclusion without positive knowledge. Believers seem to lay claim to extra knowledge.
What I said is an "established" Christian position--and often "on paper." My question is whether or not a faith claim can have epistemological support. Christian theologians treat this issue differently than septics. I want to know why.That made no sense to me at all; but I can hardly take responsibility for your interpretation of what other individual Christians have said.
In this thread, we should probably just stick to established Christian positions that exist on paper.
I have read Aquinas but, he places the text of scripture as evidence. That is circular reasoning. How do I know Jesus rose from the dead--'the Bible says so." How do I know the Bible is reliable?--"Jesus rose from the dead and attests to it." I am a bit incredulous with such reasoning.
What I said is an "established" Christian position--and often "on paper."
Of course it is--it's a brief forum with a brief question. I'm not writing my dissertation. But essentially, that is the bumper sticker position of the Anti and Post Nicene Fathers. I am simply asking for a reason why Christians believe they have knowledge which many do not find compelling and how they view the acquiring of that knowledge--does it differ in any significant way from modern Epistemological methods?That's a ridiculous parody of Aquinas's position.
No, what does that have to do with anything--I've made no claim.Yet you cited no published work of any kind.
But essentially, that is the bumper sticker position of the Anti and Post Nicene Fathers.
No, what does that have to do with anything--I've made no claim.
Okay, instead of being passive aggressive and kind of [bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse]ty--how about you help me out. This is my thread you decided to post in after all. I'm just asking a serious question here.
I guess there are words you can't write on this forum. Kind of weird for adults, but okay.Okay, instead of being passive aggressive and kind of [bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse]ty--how about you help me out. This is my thread you decided to post in after all. I'm just asking a serious question here.
I have read enough to know that I think the Van Tilian approach to epistemology, vie presuppositionalism is unsupportable (IMO). What alternatives are there?
[bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse]
Okay, I can understand that. If I had such an experience right now, I would consider that evidence of a kind. But, how would I know if I had perceived properly? Also, how could I ever trust another persons testimony?A real, personal, and powerful encounter with the Creator.
You are missing the point. I am asking about epistemology. It one of this "forrest for the trees" kind of situations.No.
You've made all kinds of claims: about Christians in general, about Aquinas, and just recently about the Anti and Post Nicene Fathers.
Look man, this is an EXPLORING CHRISTIANITY thread. Help or get lost.No.
You've made all kinds of claims: about Christians in general, about Aquinas, and just recently about the Anti and Post Nicene Fathers.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?