• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

A Case for Biblical Modesty

a pilgrim

Not a fan, but a follower.
Jul 8, 2011
514
28
✟23,735.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
A Case for Biblical Modesty Part 1

By Bro. Ben

The Bible is not only a book about WHO God is, but is also a book about WHAT God expects of us. There is NO area of a Christian's life in which is God is not concerned. Some topics are more popular and easy to talk about, but ALL are important. The topic of modesty is no exception. The 1826 Webster's Dictionary defines modesty as follows:

1. Properly, restrained by a sense of propriety; hence, not forward or bold; not presumptuous or arrogant; not boastful; as a modest youth; a modest man.

2. Not bold or forward; as a modest maid. The word may be thus used without reference to chastity.

Example: The blushing beauties of a modest maid.

3. Not loose; not lewd.

Example: Mrs. Ford, the honest woman, the modest wife.

4. Moderate; not excessive or extreme; not extravagant; as a modest request; modest joy; a modest computation.

A Lesson From Tragedy

2Samuel 11:1 And it came to pass, after the year was expired, at the time when kings go forth to battle, that David sent Joab, and his servants with him, and all Israel; and they destroyed the children of Ammon, and besieged Rabbah. But David tarried still at Jerusalem.
2Samuel 11:2 And it came to pass in an eveningtide, that David arose from off his bed, and walked upon the roof of the king's house: and from the roof he saw a woman washing herself; and the woman was very beautiful to look upon.
2Samuel 11:3 And David sent and enquired after the woman. And one said, Is not this Bathsheba, the daughter of Eliam, the wife of Uriah the Hittite?
2Samuel 11:4 And David sent messengers, and took her; and she came in unto him, and he lay with her; for she was purified from her uncleanness: and she returned unto her house.
2Samuel 11:5 And the woman conceived, and sent and told David, and said, I am with child.

David should have been away with his men, in battle. Many times tragic events happen from someone being in the wrong place at the wrong time. As he walked on his rooftop, he saw this woman, Bathsheba, bathing. She should have known her rooftop was visible from the palace of the king, but she was not concerned about that. One thing leads to another and the events go from looking, to lusting, to adultery, to an unexpected pregnancy, and then the most tragic of all, the murder of an innocent man, Uriah.

2Samuel 11:14 And it came to pass in the morning, that David wrote a letter to Joab, and sent it by the hand of Uriah.
2Samuel 11:15 And he wrote in the letter, saying, Set ye Uriah in the forefront of the hottest battle, and retire ye from him, that he may be smitten, and die.
2Samuel 11:16 And it came to pass, when Joab observed the city, that he assigned Uriah unto a place where he knew that valiant men were.
2Samuel 11:17 And the men of the city went out, and fought with Joab: and there fell some of the people of the servants of David; and Uriah the Hittite died also.

One sin lead to more sin. Sin grows like a cancer unless caught early and dealt with. David should have remembered the words of Job of old:

Job 31:1 I made a covenant with mine eyes; why then should I think upon a maid?

Bathsheba should have been thinking about who might have been looking at her. David should have been in battle with the other men. But, he could have turned quickly away and prayed for the Lord to take captive that thought and that would have been the end of that story.

2Corinthians 10:5 Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ;

Back To The Garden

Genesis 2:25 And they were both naked, the man and his wife, and were not ashamed.

When God made Adam and Eve, they were naked and it was o.k. They were existing in accordance to God's creative order. When man walks in the pathway of God's design life if a beautiful journey. But, disobedience changes everything. Enter the Serpent.

Genesis 3:1 Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?
Genesis 3:2 And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden:
Genesis 3:3 But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.
Genesis 3:4 And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:
Genesis 3:5 For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.
Genesis 3:6 And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.
Genesis 3:7 And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together, and made themselves aprons.

Because of disobedience, Adam and Eve had their minds opened alright, opened to sin! Now their thinking was corrupted. Nakedness was not a problem originally, but sin ALWAYS complicates things. Adam and Eve's eyes were opened and they saw the nakedness that was covered with God's glory that now was departed. So, in an effort to cover-up their problem they made the first sets of clothing.

Genesis 3:7 And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together, and made themselves aprons.

They made aprons. You know what an apron is, it is a small piece of cloth with ties made to keep the front of you, (or your garment,) from getting soiled. This is hardly enough to cloth a persons nakedness. Their best effort was NOT ENOUGH. Their thinking was affected by a new nature working in them...sin. They imagined an apron made them modest. God thought otherwise:

Genesis 3:21 Unto Adam also and to his wife did the LORD God make coats of skins, and clothed them.

God, knowing how they should dress in order to be PROPERLY covered made coats of skins, and clothed them. The Hebrew word, coat, means, coat, garment, robe. There is a BIG difference between an apron and a coat, a robe. Which do you think covers more? Obviously, the coat. Furthermore, the text tells us God clothed them. The Hebrew word for clothed means to properly wrap around. We'll see this very same description come up again in the New Testament. God not only gave them more than aprons, what they had now was proper, like a full robe, it wrapped around and properly covered them. This was his pattern for man to maintain, that is, man that listens to, and obeys God.

The Bible and Nakedness

Like stated earlier, sin often leads to more sin if not caught in time. The next time we see an issue with nakedness is in the life of Noah.

Genesis 9:20 And Noah began to be an husbandman, and he planted a vineyard:
Genesis 9:21 And he drank of the wine, and was drunken; and he was uncovered within his tent.
Genesis 9:22 And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brethren without.
Genesis 9:23 And Shem and Japheth took a garment, and laid it upon both their shoulders, and went backward, and covered the nakedness of their father; and their faces were backward, and they saw not their father's nakedness.
Genesis 9:24 And Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done unto him.
Genesis 9:25 And he said, Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren.

How we hate it when we see a good man struck down. Here, Noah, the one who preached so courageously for 120 years about the sinfulness of those around him and coming judgment of God, gives in to the sin of drunkenness in the shadow of Mt. Ararat. In his drunkenness, he passes out naked and his son, Ham comes in and sees him. Ham should have been more reverent, but his actions caused Noah to pronounce a curse upon the descendant of Ham. Shem and Japheth, having a serious attitude about sin, came in, not beholding his nakedness, and covered him up. Nakedness is ALWAYS to be covered up.

Some may argue, how naked is naked? Well, actually, according to the Bible, one does not have to be completely unclothed to be considered "naked."
Look at the example of the Priests:

Exodus 20:25 And if thou wilt make me an altar of stone, thou shalt not build it of hewn stone: for if thou lift up thy tool upon it, thou hast polluted it.
Exodus 20:26 Neither shalt thou go up by steps unto mine altar, that thy nakedness be not discovered thereon.

The altar of God was to have a ramp instead of steps because God did not want the priests, who wore long modest garments, to hike their legs up the stairs in such a way that their legs were exposed and their nakedness was discovered. God does not want the leg exposed. . . any of it. We will see more of this same thing in a moment. Notice in the Book of Leviticus, nakedness is such an issue, God gives 14 verses of the chapter to make it obvious that he does not want his people to take nakedness lightly. Here is just a few of the verses:

Leviticus 18:6 None of you shall approach to any that is near of kin to him, to uncover their nakedness: I am the LORD.
Leviticus 18:7 The nakedness of thy father, or the nakedness of thy mother, shalt thou not uncover: she is thy mother; thou shalt not uncover her nakedness.
Leviticus 18:8 The nakedness of thy father's wife shalt thou not uncover: it is thy father's nakedness.
Leviticus 18:9 The nakedness of thy sister, the daughter of thy father, or daughter of thy mother, whether she be born at home, or born abroad, even their nakedness thou shalt not uncover.

God hated this type of activity because it was the practice of the wicked people he was driving out of the promised land that Israel would soon inherit.

Leviticus 18:24 Defile not ye yourselves in any of these things: for in all these the nations are defiled which I cast out before you:
Levitucus 18:25 And the land is defiled: therefore I do visit the iniquity thereof upon it, and the land itself vomiteth out her inhabitants.
Leviticus 18:26 Ye shall therefore keep my statutes and my judgments, and shall not commit any of these abominations; neither any of your own nation, nor any stranger that sojourneth among you:
Leviticus 18:27 (For all these abominations have the men of the land done, which were before you, and the land is defiled
Leviticus 18:28 That the land spue not you out also, when ye defile it, as it spued out the nations that were before you.
Leviticus 18:29 For whosoever shall commit any of these abominations, even the souls that commit them shall be cut off from among their people.
Leviticus 18:30 Therefore shall ye keep mine ordinance, that ye commit not any one of these abominable customs, which were committed before you, and that ye defile not yourselves therein: I am the LORD your God.

The Prophetic Example of Babylon.

In Isaiah chapter 47, God is preparing to bring judgment upon those of Babylon. He likens that land to a virgin daughter who, uncovers her nakedness and draws the anger and judgment of God:

Isaiah 47:1 Come down, and sit in the dust, O virgin daughter of Babylon, sit on the ground: there is no throne, O daughter of the Chaldeans: for thou shalt no more be called tender and delicate.
Isaiah 47:2 Take the millstones, and grind meal: uncover thy locks, make bare the leg, uncover the thigh, pass over the rivers.
Isaiah 47:3 Thy nakedness shall be uncovered, yea, thy shame shall be seen: I will take vengeance, and I will not meet thee as a man.

When a woman of any age, does not observe God's clear teaching on modesty, bad things occur. Isaiah said she would not longer be called, "...tender and delicate." When a woman, especially a young virgin girl, begins to give in to the fashions of the time and dress immodestly, she loses that sweet innocence of youth and is no longer tender and delicate. When the attention of a strong spiritual inner man is no longer important, and attention to dress and style give way to immodesty a young lady no longer wants to be considered a "young girl," but likes it when people think she is older.

This virgin daughter goes through a series of steps downward until she has put herself in the pathway of God's judgment:
1. She uncovers her locks.
2. She makes bare the leg.
3. She uncovers the thigh.

What is the result of these actions?

Isaiah 47:3 Thy nakedness shall be uncovered, yea, thy shame shall be seen: I will take vengeance, and I will not meet thee as a man.

Though this is another topic that we will address in another message, the practice of covering the head goes back to antiquity. It is neither, Greek nor Hebrew, and is not just subject to culture or time periods. This girl considered this unimportant, and throws her covering to the wind. She then made some of the leg uncovered, and then the thigh. God saw this as nakedness. God not only wants the thigh covered, but the whole leg, too!

Continued in next Tread
 

Helmut-WK

Member
Nov 26, 2007
2,123
444
Berlin
✟102,602.00
Country
Germany
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
The 1826 Webster's Dictionary defines modesty as follows:
Is this still the meaning of that word? English is not my mother tongue, according to what I have learned and what I can read in dictionaries, modest now is used without reference to chastity (even the book You cite knows of this usage). The contrary of being modest is boasting.

A Lesson From Tragedy
A rather clear case.

Back To The Garden
As you say, cloth is part of remedy for a consequence of sin. Nakedness was natural (it is still natural for animals), but with the fallen nature of man it is no good thing.

The Prophetic Example of Babylon.
Here I can't follow your exegesis.

Isaiah 47:1 Come down, and sit in the dust, O virgin daughter of Babylon, sit on the ground: there is no throne, O daughter of the Chaldeans: for thou shalt no more be called tender and delicate.
Isaiah 47:2 Take the millstones, and grind meal: uncover thy locks, make bare the leg, uncover the thigh, pass over the rivers.
Isaiah 47:3 Thy nakedness shall be uncovered, yea, thy shame shall be seen: I will take vengeance, and I will not meet thee as a man.

Is 47,2 is no description what a woman does, it is a figurative description of the judgement on the city of Babylon. In the Bible, a city is often compared to a woman, e.g. when Jerusalem lets strange gods into her gates, she is an adulteress (a woman that allows other men than her husband to enter her body), or the conquering of a city is compared to a rape: the city has to put away her jewels (golden ornaments and the like, that are now spent to buy armament), she is made naked (the enemies can see her secrets), her private parts (the points where she can entered easily) become visible, and in the end the enemy penetrates her gates ...

The metaphoric field town=woman, idolatry=adultery etc. is used often in the OT, with some variation. The close relationship of fertility cults (e.g. Ba'al and Ashera) with sex rites helped to strengthen this picture.

Is 47,1-3 is along these metaphorical figure: Babylon, the virgin (no enemy could enter her) is put to shame, she has leave her throne, work like a slave girl (milling), and crossing the river her nakedness will be seen openly. This is no lesson on modesty, but a description of the humiliation of the "virgin Babylon" who had humiliated so many "daughters", including the daughter Jerusalem. I can't see that anything described in Is 47,1-3 is done at free will, these are commands Babylon has to obey.

As to the precise literal sense of these verses, I am not sure, but it is surely part of the judgement on Babylon fulfilled by Cyrus and his generals.
 
Upvote 0

skyfox

Newbie
Aug 20, 2011
1
0
✟22,611.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
God forbids children from seeing their parent's nakedness and gives a command for children to honor their parents.

How, then, do adult children care for aging parents?? How do adult daughters bathe their fathers or tend to his toilet needs when there are no sons or grandsons and there is no money nor insurance coverage to pay for home nurse care? Are they to put him in a nursing home and surrender his estate to the state??
 
Upvote 0

a pilgrim

Not a fan, but a follower.
Jul 8, 2011
514
28
✟23,735.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Here I can't follow your exegesis.

Isaiah 47:1 Come down, and sit in the dust, O virgin daughter of Babylon, sit on the ground: there is no throne, O daughter of the Chaldeans: for thou shalt no more be called tender and delicate.
Isaiah 47:2 Take the millstones, and grind meal: uncover thy locks, make bare the leg, uncover the thigh, pass over the rivers.
Isaiah 47:3 Thy nakedness shall be uncovered, yea, thy shame shall be seen: I will take vengeance, and I will not meet thee as a man.

Is 47,2 is no description what a woman does, it is a figurative description of the judgement on the city of Babylon. In the Bible, a city is often compared to a woman, e.g. when Jerusalem lets strange gods into her gates, she is an adulteress (a woman that allows other men than her husband to enter her body), or the conquering of a city is compared to a rape: the city has to put away her jewels (golden ornaments and the like, that are now spent to buy armament), she is made naked (the enemies can see her secrets), her private parts (the points where she can entered easily) become visible, and in the end the enemy penetrates her gates ...

The metaphoric field town=woman, idolatry=adultery etc. is used often in the OT, with some variation. The close relationship of fertility cults (e.g. Ba'al and Ashera) with sex rites helped to strengthen this picture.

Is 47,1-3 is along these metaphorical figure: Babylon, the virgin (no enemy could enter her) is put to shame, she has leave her throne, work like a slave girl (milling), and crossing the river her nakedness will be seen openly. This is no lesson on modesty, but a description of the humiliation of the "virgin Babylon" who had humiliated so many "daughters", including the daughter Jerusalem. I can't see that anything described in Is 47,1-3 is done at free will, these are commands Babylon has to obey.

As to the precise literal sense of these verses, I am not sure, but it is surely part of the judgement on Babylon fulfilled by Cyrus and his generals.

If you will REread my original post, I said,

He likens that land to a virgin daughter who, uncovers her nakedness and draws the anger and judgment of God:

I clear said it is a metaphor, i.e., "He likens..." You miss the point entirely.

Isaiah 47:3 Thy nakedness shall be uncovered, yea, thy shame shall be seen: I will take vengeance, and I will not meet thee as a man.

The point being drawn out here is the uncovering of nakedness, which God prohibits. God calls it a shame. Thus immodesty is shameful in light of the high calling of holiness God asks of his people. God hasn't changed, even if the peoples "dictionary" has.

Skyfox, you said:

God forbids children from seeing their parent's nakedness and gives a command for children to honor their parents.

How, then, do adult children care for aging parents?? How do adult daughters bathe their fathers or tend to his toilet needs when there are no sons or grandsons and there is no money nor insurance coverage to pay for home nurse care? Are they to put him in a nursing home and surrender his estate to the state??

The "seeing" of ones parents nakedness, in context of the Old Testament, had more to do with the sinful practices of the heathen whom God ejected from the land. He called his people to a higher calling.

This is not a contradiction for our call to care for and love our families. You are chasing the rabbit so hard, you've complete deviated from the instruction this message is getting across, i.e., modesty in our contemporary corrupted age.

NOTE: I want to add this observation, it is not directed to anyone, but, if the shoe fits, wear it. Many today have a great understanding of the word of God, they know the Greek, the Hebrew, the verb tense, the historic context of verses, the metaphoric use of wording, however, they do not go to the same lengths to do something EXTREMELY profound. . . obey the word. Live it.

John 14
[15] If ye love me, keep my commandments.
[23] Jesus answered and said unto him, If a man love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him.

Our "Christian" society does not lack in teachers, it lacks is those who live the word, and walk it out everyday. Holiness is a theological concept based on what happened at our justification instead, (both) that and it's outward manifestation in the lives of God's people. He still meant this:

1 Peter 1
[16] Because it is written, Be ye holy; for I am holy.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Helmut-WK

Member
Nov 26, 2007
2,123
444
Berlin
✟102,602.00
Country
Germany
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
If you will REread my original post, I said,
He likens that land to a virgin daughter who, uncovers her nakedness and draws the anger and judgment of God:
I clear said it is a metaphor, i.e., "He likens..." You miss the point entirely.
I can't see that the text in Is 47:1-3 does say anything on modesty. We have a (metaphorical) virgin forced to get uncovered and work like a slave. She did the same to other "virgins" (e.g. Jerusalem), now she has to experience the very same things she did to them.

The point being drawn out here is the uncovering of nakedness, which God prohibits. God calls it a shame.
To show this you don't have to cite Is 47 ... it is self-evident. Even in cultures living in an environment where cloth is unhealthy (jungle), and therefore go rather naked, there is a limit that should not be transgressed - like wearing a cord round the waist: without that cord a person is naked and put to shame, with it he/she is modestly dressed.

There is no detailed description of a "biblical" way of dressing, so a Christian should respect the dressing code of the culture he lives in. Complications arise where different cultures met. Europeans coming to East Africa were astonished by seeing bare breasts, while the inhabitants there were offended seeing bare calves of female Europeans. Culture change is another reason - about 100 years ago a woman in German was sentenced for showing her ankle when she left a streetcar.

In short - outside the realms of porno industry you will hardly find a person that does not see nakedness as a shame. But people disagree how to draw the line between decent dress and indecent showing of forbidden body parts. I mentioned the jungle as one extreme (and I can't believe that Gods requires people to wear a dress that is unhealthy in their habitat), the other extreme is Afghanistan, where it is considered of indecent self-display if a woman let see her eyes (you may argue against this extreme that complete body coverage is unhealthy, too, but this is off-topic to the point I draw out).
 
Upvote 0

bugkiller

Well-Known Member
May 16, 2015
17,773
2,629
✟95,400.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
A Case for Biblical Modesty Part 1

By Bro. Ben

The Bible is not only a book about WHO God is, but is also a book about WHAT God expects of us. There is NO area of a Christian's life in which is God is not concerned. Some topics are more popular and easy to talk about, but ALL are important. The topic of modesty is no exception. The 1826 Webster's Dictionary defines modesty as follows:

1. Properly, restrained by a sense of propriety; hence, not forward or bold; not presumptuous or arrogant; not boastful; as a modest youth; a modest man.

2. Not bold or forward; as a modest maid. The word may be thus used without reference to chastity.

Example: The blushing beauties of a modest maid.

3. Not loose; not lewd.

Example: Mrs. Ford, the honest woman, the modest wife.

4. Moderate; not excessive or extreme; not extravagant; as a modest request; modest joy; a modest computation.

A Lesson From Tragedy

2Samuel 11:1 And it came to pass, after the year was expired, at the time when kings go forth to battle, that David sent Joab, and his servants with him, and all Israel; and they destroyed the children of Ammon, and besieged Rabbah. But David tarried still at Jerusalem.
2Samuel 11:2 And it came to pass in an eveningtide, that David arose from off his bed, and walked upon the roof of the king's house: and from the roof he saw a woman washing herself; and the woman was very beautiful to look upon.
2Samuel 11:3 And David sent and enquired after the woman. And one said, Is not this Bathsheba, the daughter of Eliam, the wife of Uriah the Hittite?
2Samuel 11:4 And David sent messengers, and took her; and she came in unto him, and he lay with her; for she was purified from her uncleanness: and she returned unto her house.
2Samuel 11:5 And the woman conceived, and sent and told David, and said, I am with child.

David should have been away with his men, in battle. Many times tragic events happen from someone being in the wrong place at the wrong time. As he walked on his rooftop, he saw this woman, Bathsheba, bathing. She should have known her rooftop was visible from the palace of the king, but she was not concerned about that. One thing leads to another and the events go from looking, to lusting, to adultery, to an unexpected pregnancy, and then the most tragic of all, the murder of an innocent man, Uriah.

2Samuel 11:14 And it came to pass in the morning, that David wrote a letter to Joab, and sent it by the hand of Uriah.
2Samuel 11:15 And he wrote in the letter, saying, Set ye Uriah in the forefront of the hottest battle, and retire ye from him, that he may be smitten, and die.
2Samuel 11:16 And it came to pass, when Joab observed the city, that he assigned Uriah unto a place where he knew that valiant men were.
2Samuel 11:17 And the men of the city went out, and fought with Joab: and there fell some of the people of the servants of David; and Uriah the Hittite died also.

One sin lead to more sin. Sin grows like a cancer unless caught early and dealt with. David should have remembered the words of Job of old:

Job 31:1 I made a covenant with mine eyes; why then should I think upon a maid?

Bathsheba should have been thinking about who might have been looking at her. David should have been in battle with the other men. But, he could have turned quickly away and prayed for the Lord to take captive that thought and that would have been the end of that story.

2Corinthians 10:5 Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ;

Back To The Garden

Genesis 2:25 And they were both naked, the man and his wife, and were not ashamed.

When God made Adam and Eve, they were naked and it was o.k. They were existing in accordance to God's creative order. When man walks in the pathway of God's design life if a beautiful journey. But, disobedience changes everything. Enter the Serpent.

Genesis 3:1 Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?
Genesis 3:2 And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden:
Genesis 3:3 But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.
Genesis 3:4 And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:
Genesis 3:5 For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.
Genesis 3:6 And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.
Genesis 3:7 And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together, and made themselves aprons.

Because of disobedience, Adam and Eve had their minds opened alright, opened to sin! Now their thinking was corrupted. Nakedness was not a problem originally, but sin ALWAYS complicates things. Adam and Eve's eyes were opened and they saw the nakedness that was covered with God's glory that now was departed. So, in an effort to cover-up their problem they made the first sets of clothing.

Genesis 3:7 And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together, and made themselves aprons.

They made aprons. You know what an apron is, it is a small piece of cloth with ties made to keep the front of you, (or your garment,) from getting soiled. This is hardly enough to cloth a persons nakedness. Their best effort was NOT ENOUGH. Their thinking was affected by a new nature working in them...sin. They imagined an apron made them modest. God thought otherwise:

Genesis 3:21 Unto Adam also and to his wife did the LORD God make coats of skins, and clothed them.

God, knowing how they should dress in order to be PROPERLY covered made coats of skins, and clothed them. The Hebrew word, coat, means, coat, garment, robe. There is a BIG difference between an apron and a coat, a robe. Which do you think covers more? Obviously, the coat. Furthermore, the text tells us God clothed them. The Hebrew word for clothed means to properly wrap around. We'll see this very same description come up again in the New Testament. God not only gave them more than aprons, what they had now was proper, like a full robe, it wrapped around and properly covered them. This was his pattern for man to maintain, that is, man that listens to, and obeys God.

The Bible and Nakedness

Like stated earlier, sin often leads to more sin if not caught in time. The next time we see an issue with nakedness is in the life of Noah.

Genesis 9:20 And Noah began to be an husbandman, and he planted a vineyard:
Genesis 9:21 And he drank of the wine, and was drunken; and he was uncovered within his tent.
Genesis 9:22 And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brethren without.
Genesis 9:23 And Shem and Japheth took a garment, and laid it upon both their shoulders, and went backward, and covered the nakedness of their father; and their faces were backward, and they saw not their father's nakedness.
Genesis 9:24 And Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done unto him.
Genesis 9:25 And he said, Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren.

How we hate it when we see a good man struck down. Here, Noah, the one who preached so courageously for 120 years about the sinfulness of those around him and coming judgment of God, gives in to the sin of drunkenness in the shadow of Mt. Ararat. In his drunkenness, he passes out naked and his son, Ham comes in and sees him. Ham should have been more reverent, but his actions caused Noah to pronounce a curse upon the descendant of Ham. Shem and Japheth, having a serious attitude about sin, came in, not beholding his nakedness, and covered him up. Nakedness is ALWAYS to be covered up.

Some may argue, how naked is naked? Well, actually, according to the Bible, one does not have to be completely unclothed to be considered "naked."
Look at the example of the Priests:

Exodus 20:25 And if thou wilt make me an altar of stone, thou shalt not build it of hewn stone: for if thou lift up thy tool upon it, thou hast polluted it.
Exodus 20:26 Neither shalt thou go up by steps unto mine altar, that thy nakedness be not discovered thereon.

The altar of God was to have a ramp instead of steps because God did not want the priests, who wore long modest garments, to hike their legs up the stairs in such a way that their legs were exposed and their nakedness was discovered. God does not want the leg exposed. . . any of it. We will see more of this same thing in a moment. Notice in the Book of Leviticus, nakedness is such an issue, God gives 14 verses of the chapter to make it obvious that he does not want his people to take nakedness lightly. Here is just a few of the verses:

Leviticus 18:6 None of you shall approach to any that is near of kin to him, to uncover their nakedness: I am the LORD.
Leviticus 18:7 The nakedness of thy father, or the nakedness of thy mother, shalt thou not uncover: she is thy mother; thou shalt not uncover her nakedness.
Leviticus 18:8 The nakedness of thy father's wife shalt thou not uncover: it is thy father's nakedness.
Leviticus 18:9 The nakedness of thy sister, the daughter of thy father, or daughter of thy mother, whether she be born at home, or born abroad, even their nakedness thou shalt not uncover.

God hated this type of activity because it was the practice of the wicked people he was driving out of the promised land that Israel would soon inherit.

Leviticus 18:24 Defile not ye yourselves in any of these things: for in all these the nations are defiled which I cast out before you:
Levitucus 18:25 And the land is defiled: therefore I do visit the iniquity thereof upon it, and the land itself vomiteth out her inhabitants.
Leviticus 18:26 Ye shall therefore keep my statutes and my judgments, and shall not commit any of these abominations; neither any of your own nation, nor any stranger that sojourneth among you:
Leviticus 18:27 (For all these abominations have the men of the land done, which were before you, and the land is defiled
Leviticus 18:28 That the land spue not you out also, when ye defile it, as it spued out the nations that were before you.
Leviticus 18:29 For whosoever shall commit any of these abominations, even the souls that commit them shall be cut off from among their people.
Leviticus 18:30 Therefore shall ye keep mine ordinance, that ye commit not any one of these abominable customs, which were committed before you, and that ye defile not yourselves therein: I am the LORD your God.

The Prophetic Example of Babylon.

In Isaiah chapter 47, God is preparing to bring judgment upon those of Babylon. He likens that land to a virgin daughter who, uncovers her nakedness and draws the anger and judgment of God:

Isaiah 47:1 Come down, and sit in the dust, O virgin daughter of Babylon, sit on the ground: there is no throne, O daughter of the Chaldeans: for thou shalt no more be called tender and delicate.
Isaiah 47:2 Take the millstones, and grind meal: uncover thy locks, make bare the leg, uncover the thigh, pass over the rivers.
Isaiah 47:3 Thy nakedness shall be uncovered, yea, thy shame shall be seen: I will take vengeance, and I will not meet thee as a man.

When a woman of any age, does not observe God's clear teaching on modesty, bad things occur. Isaiah said she would not longer be called, "...tender and delicate." When a woman, especially a young virgin girl, begins to give in to the fashions of the time and dress immodestly, she loses that sweet innocence of youth and is no longer tender and delicate. When the attention of a strong spiritual inner man is no longer important, and attention to dress and style give way to immodesty a young lady no longer wants to be considered a "young girl," but likes it when people think she is older.

This virgin daughter goes through a series of steps downward until she has put herself in the pathway of God's judgment:
1. She uncovers her locks.
2. She makes bare the leg.
3. She uncovers the thigh.

What is the result of these actions?

Isaiah 47:3 Thy nakedness shall be uncovered, yea, thy shame shall be seen: I will take vengeance, and I will not meet thee as a man.

Though this is another topic that we will address in another message, the practice of covering the head goes back to antiquity. It is neither, Greek nor Hebrew, and is not just subject to culture or time periods. This girl considered this unimportant, and throws her covering to the wind. She then made some of the leg uncovered, and then the thigh. God saw this as nakedness. God not only wants the thigh covered, but the whole leg, too!

Continued in next Tread
Modesty is certianly an issue. What really constitutes modesty. Clothing or conduct?

We use clothing as a means to hide primarily. It does have other functions such as distinguishing authority or protection from the elements in a case by case basis. The improper dress codes are determined by society. Some things may not be immodest in one situation but would be in another. What really makes it immodest is the conduct. True one would wear a swim suit to a worship event - church on Sunday morning for instance.

bugkiller
 
Upvote 0

jackpetersen

Newbie
Sep 27, 2011
11
0
✟30,121.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Female immodesty is common in secular American culture because it is the means by which women compete for attention from the most favorable men.

Prior to the loosening of sexual standards in the 1960s, women did not have anywhere near as much trouble securing commitment from marriage minded men.

During and after the sexual 'revolution' the sexual freedom to experiment and compete for attention started an arms race among women for attention from the highest-status men.

This is why plastic surgery, trashy clothing, and other methods began to crop up. Women tend to crowd their efforts all toward capturing the "alpha male" who - amazing coincidence - happens to be the guy that all the other women want as well.

Since the number of alpha males is much smaller than the number of women who think they should get such a man, the inter-female competition is fierce, and high heels, short skirts, expensive makeup and loose morals are all called upon to increase that woman's chances against the others.

This creates a race to the bottom in behavior. If women would accept men that are closer to their actual attractiveness level, they would see greater success and would not need to resort to such extreme measures. Immodesty and attention-seeking is out of control. Just look at "Girls Gone Wild" and other such wholesale defacement of God's gift of female youth and beauty.
 
Upvote 0

a pilgrim

Not a fan, but a follower.
Jul 8, 2011
514
28
✟23,735.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Thank you, brother Jack, well said. Would it be fair for me to say to some extent, this attitude has moved into the churches, (perhpas to a lesser extent, but I have seen some glaring cases.) This may seem odd, but perhaps the search should be for a "goldy" man, a "holy" man, instead of a good looking, or rich one. The church has been overly influenced by the world, in a negative way. Yes, we are to be IN the world, but we are not to be OF the world. You can be in it, and not polluted by it.
 
Upvote 0

LovebirdsFlying

My husband drew this cartoon of me.
Christian Forums Staff
Purple Team - Moderator
Site Supporter
Aug 13, 2007
30,898
4,604
61
Washington (the state)
✟1,092,731.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I often enjoy watching fashion shows on television, such as "What Not to Wear" or "How Do I Look?" These shows can go in either direction as far as modesty. Sometimes they'll teach a slob or a frump how to choose flattering, professional looking clothes that will land them a decent job or promotion. Other times they have a woman whose clothing is far too revealing, and show her that an elegant dress that covers her up is much more attractive than leaving nothing to the imagination.

But one recent episode of "How Do I Look?" deeply saddened me. The woman, age 39, was from the South and was a devout Christian. She wore long, pastel-colored dresses that in my opinion were lovely, although I do admit her overall style was rather drab. While saying on one hand that they wanted her to stay true to her beliefs, they also teased her about living in the wrong century, implied that this was the reason she hadn't found a man yet, and generally shamed her until she dressed in a more worldly style. Sigh.
 
Upvote 0