M
Martingale
Guest
do you think the NWO has you on their to-be-arrested lists? I know the answer, but I'm not telling.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
His own words say "I've been marked down as a paid disinfo agent of the NWO. "This is TRUE"..............so I say your either a paid disinfo agent or a Liar, either one can't be trusted
Its cute how internet forum posters are always convinced that the NWO cares enough about their opinions to hire "paid disinfo agent" to stymie them.
My eyes see a partial view of a building collapsing. That's it. I don't hear any detonations going off prior to or doing the collapse. I refer to the experts on this because they are...well, experts..
Before the attack, SEC investigations of corporate fraud by companies such as Enron and Worldcom were the subject of many news reports -- reports that virtually vanished in the wake of the attack.
I'm still waiting for you to answer my question regarding the $2.3 trillion myth. How were they able to steal $2.3 trillion from $389 billion? Now, answer it. If you can't, then quit repeating the myth.
Btodd said:You've never addressed how these powerful explosions were so quiet, nor how thermite is supposed to:
1. Leave molten metal for weeks
2. Sever vertical columns, in perfectly-timed succession to make it appear like it collapsed from the top-down, since it uses gravity to 'melt' through its target (like an acid would)
3. Survive the impact of the planes and ensuing fires and still work
4. How any of this was installed, what mechanism would be used
5. How much thermite would be needed to accomplish this
6. A single example of thermite ever being used to demolish a skyscraper, after saying it's 'old hat in demolitions'
Someone asked previously where's the firefighters for 9/11 truth: YouTube - ‪FirefightersFor911TRUTH.org - Erik Lawyer - Press Conference‬‏
He specified '9/11 firefighters' for a reason.
Which means what?
Their organization is called Firefighters for 9-11 Truth.
Yes they are "trying to imply that controlled demolition happened." Go ahead ignore this one too!Surely, you understand the distinction I'm making. It's not that 'no firefighters anywhere are 9/11 Truthers', it's that 'no NYC Firefighters that were there on 9/11 are 9/11 Truthers', including every single person in the video that both you and ManFromUncle have posted, trying to imply that a controlled demolition happened.
Btodd
Fire Fighters For 9-11 Truth » About UsNFPA (National Fire Protection Association) 921, which is the National Standard for Fire and Explosion Investigations, very clearly indicates in numerous sections that the possibility of explosives should have been thoroughly investigated. Specifically in NFPA 921 18.3.2
High Order Damage -
“High-order damage is characterized by shattering of the structure, producing small, pulverized debris. Walls, roofs, and structural members are splintered or shattered, with the building completely demolished. Debris is thrown great distances, possibly hundreds of feet. High-order damage is the result of rapid rates of pressure rise.” World Trade Center’s 1, 2, and 7 all clearly met this definition; therefore they should have been thoroughly investigated and analyzed for explosives. Specifically, the use of “exotic accelerants” should have been investigated. In NFPA 921 19.2.4
-”Exotic Accelerants,” three indicators were clearly met that should have led to a thorough investigation in to the possible use of “exotic accelerants,” specifically as stated in the guideline, “Thermite mixtures.”
So, why was the possibility of explosives, controlled demolition, or the use of “exotic accelerants” not thoroughly investigated, or even mentioned in the 9-11 Commission Report?
I'm sorry, but I really don't understand what your point is. Just because I'm a "truther", a phrase I hate btw, I don't pretend to have even half the answers, I ask questions.
Then you need glasses. Does this look like a "partial" collapse? WTC 7 in center, never hit by a plane, went straight down symmetrically at free fall speed:
For what? What exactly is he accused of?So you agree Donald Rumsfeld should be in jail?
Where? Where is it shown that $2.3 trillion was stolen ? Who was even making that claim? Certainly not Rumsfeld. Who has been accused of stealing the $2.3 trillion? Certainly not Rumsfeld. Most importantly, how can $2.3 trillion be stolen from $289 billion? Explain how that is even possible. $289 billion was the total amount alloted for Defense in 2001.Here's your "myth" LOL:
The point is that nobody on the NY Fire Department, who were actually there that day and in a position to know, think that the collapse of the buildings was due to a controlled demolition.
You know this how?
Also, still asking (this is at least the 5th time now) for you to answer the question, 'Why did the 2nd building to be hit collapse FIRST?'.
I don't know why you think any of us would know.
You should know. It isn't rocket science. What was the weight of the structure above the impact zone of the 2nd hit as compared to the weight of the structure above the impact zone of the 1st hit?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?