Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
90% Trump 2017 coverage negative
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Halbhh" data-source="post: 72233728" data-attributes="member: 375234"><p>I agree if I thought that it would be very out of touch. hah hah</p><p></p><p>Perhaps it is better to add that also, just like you have, even if most everyone already knows, yes.</p><p></p><p>Now that we know we agree on that, let's look in the opposite direction also. We can learn about the faults of Washington, Lincoln, Reagan, learn they all had feet of clay like anyone. And, these 2 candidates from 2016 are far from having that time in office to show what they can do yet. Etc. Unique individuals, unique situations, different moments in time, never the same river twice, etc. Neither Hillary nor Trump has truly been tested like those 3 were, not yet. Also, did I mention I expect Trump to go a fair ways to destabilize the world? Speaking of which, perhaps that's just all inevitable, because I think all He foretold in Matthew 24 has gotta start, or have the groundwork laid, at some point too. Did I leave anything out?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Halbhh, post: 72233728, member: 375234"] I agree if I thought that it would be very out of touch. hah hah Perhaps it is better to add that also, just like you have, even if most everyone already knows, yes. Now that we know we agree on that, let's look in the opposite direction also. We can learn about the faults of Washington, Lincoln, Reagan, learn they all had feet of clay like anyone. And, these 2 candidates from 2016 are far from having that time in office to show what they can do yet. Etc. Unique individuals, unique situations, different moments in time, never the same river twice, etc. Neither Hillary nor Trump has truly been tested like those 3 were, not yet. Also, did I mention I expect Trump to go a fair ways to destabilize the world? Speaking of which, perhaps that's just all inevitable, because I think all He foretold in Matthew 24 has gotta start, or have the groundwork laid, at some point too. Did I leave anything out? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
90% Trump 2017 coverage negative
Top
Bottom