• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,127
33,262
✟583,992.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
I don't want to say too much, 'cause it spoils the fun, but based on the cut @Albion did, one rather obscure answer would be 2.71828182...
It seems that the way I looked at the issue is different from what you had in mind.
 
Upvote 0

Resha Caner

Expert Fool
Sep 16, 2010
9,171
1,398
✟163,100.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
It seems that the way I looked at the issue is different from what you had in mind.

I mused on some ways I might answer the question, but I didn't have a specific answer in mind. Rather I was interested how various psychoses ... uh, I mean how various creative impulses would interpret the question.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tom 1
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,127
33,262
✟583,992.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
I mused on some ways I might answer the question, but I didn't have a specific answer in mind. Rather I was interested how various psychoses ... uh, I mean how various creative impulses would interpret the question.
Okay. I guess we have to explain ourselves sooner or later.

The way I looked at it was cutting in half the character itself (8), not halving the value of eight which would be four. If we literally cut the character in half lengthwise we would have a 3. It wouldn't be the 3 that every font uses, but a legitimate, universally recognized one nonetheless.

If, however, we cut it in half crosswise, you could say we'd wind up with two 0s, but the shape would actually be more like the letter o in small case and only half the height of the 8 that we started with.
 
Upvote 0

Resha Caner

Expert Fool
Sep 16, 2010
9,171
1,398
✟163,100.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Okay. I guess we have to explain ourselves sooner or later.

The way I looked at it was cutting in half the character itself (8), not halving the value of eight which would be four. If we literally cut the character in half lengthwise we would have a 3. It wouldn't be the 3 that every font uses, but a legitimate, universally recognized one nonetheless.

If, however, we cut it in half crosswise, you could say we'd wind up with two 0s, but the shape would actually be more like the letter o in small case and only half the height of the 8 that we started with.

Yes, I got that ... and also thought about slicing the character rather than the value it represents (which implies a very interesting conversation on the philosophy of language). However, the 3 is only half of what you got. The other half is E, which is a transcendental number approximated as 2.71828182...

Of course, someone might point out it is actually written 'e' (lowercase), not 'E' (uppercase). I could then counter that the Greek uppercase sigma looks very much like the English uppercase 'E', and is used to symbolize an arithmetic series. The number e is equivalent to the series E (k=0,infinity) 1/k!

But then some might argue that requires the shape of the character to change, to which I could respond that I never stipulated the shape couldn't evolve. Once that word enters the conversation, we would spin off into a discussion rabid argument about how the earth is flat, only 6000 years old, and God created it; nothing evolves.

How could you not see the potential for such a thing? After all, this is CF.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,127
33,262
✟583,992.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
However, the 3 is only half of what you got. The other half is E, which is a transcendental number approximated as 2.71828182...
I called that wastage. The trimmings. You know, like every seamstress has left over after finishing the product she was making. ;)

Of course, someone might point out it is actually written 'e' (lowercase), not 'E' (uppercase). I could then counter that the Greek uppercase sigma looks very much like the English uppercase 'E', and is used to symbolize an arithmetic series.
Now that I have to rule out. An uppercase E does not look like a Sigma. It only has a vaguely similar appearance. So if I ruled out the two small the 'o's that would be the result of slicing the figure of the number 8 in half crosswise, I'd have to rule this one out for the same reason.

:)
 
Upvote 0

Resha Caner

Expert Fool
Sep 16, 2010
9,171
1,398
✟163,100.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Now that I have to rule out.

Usurper. Who died and made you OP?

I also see you intend to rule as a conservative. Does that mean you won't allow rotating the figure? Or what about more than 1 cut? I could make 2 cuts and rejoin parts such that the two resulting figures contain equal amounts of ink, yet make an x and an o.
 
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,127
33,262
✟583,992.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Usurper. Who died and made you OP?

Now, now. I simply said that I have to rule it out (in my own calculations).

I also see you intend to rule as a conservative.
Do I? I thought we were working on a riddle.

Does that mean you won't allow rotating the figure?
I considered that to do such a thing would amount to altering the figure we were supposed to be dealing with.

Or what about more than 1 cut? I could make 2 cuts and rejoin parts such that the two resulting figures contain equal amounts of ink, yet make an x and an o.
Same problem. If we were allowed to slice the numeral 8 in all sorts of ways, there probably wouldn't be any limit to the figures that could be created out of the scraps. And that would make the answer to the riddle be "almost anything you want."
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Tom 1
Upvote 0

Resha Caner

Expert Fool
Sep 16, 2010
9,171
1,398
✟163,100.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

Resha Caner

Expert Fool
Sep 16, 2010
9,171
1,398
✟163,100.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
[T]hat would make the answer to the riddle be "almost anything you want."

Indeed. How would that make this thread unique?

I was also waiting for someone to demand further explanation of the rules. I will allow rotations and up to 3 cuts, since 2^3 = 8.
 
Upvote 0