Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Is there anything more worthless than posting a video instead of answering whether your "Geneva" bible is the ORIGINAL Scriptures as given by GOD to the Jews.
Pppppppppppp. Yeah, the ORIGINAL Masoretic was copied into Latin, and then it was lost to history, so the Jews copied the Septuagint back into the Masoretic. GREAT JOB.
Are you familiar with the Dead Sea Scrolls? Are you aware that they VALIDATE the Masoretic Text?
Pretty funny how many lies we're told, and how many lies we repeat back,
DaDad
Is there anything more worthless than posting a video instead of answering whether your "Geneva" bible is the ORIGINAL Scriptures as given by GOD to the Jews.
DaDad
You can call yourself a horse.
That does not make you a horse.
There is only one type of Christian, instead of two.
As pointed out in Dear “Carnal Christian”, the visible church is overburdened with professing Christians who have never been truly converted. What I mean by “visible church” is that there is a distinction between the professing church and the true Church. The professing church, or visible church, is comprised of both genuine believers and mere professing believers who are still dead in their sins (Ephesians 2:1). On the other hand, the invisible church, or Body of Christ or true Church, is exclusively comprised of born again saints who have been sealed by the Holy Spirit through repentance and faith in the Lord Jesus Christ.
Make up your mind.
The part of your post found above agrees with everything I said...
.
You may wish to read these passages, then (the Trinity doesn't act separately from one another - and that's why we gathered from what you posted that you were suggesting Jesus is not God - that's what you intimated):
Christ is the visible image of the invisible God. He existed before anything was created and is supreme over all creation, for through him God created everything in the heavenly realms and on earth. He made the things we can see and the things we can't see--such as thrones, kingdoms, rulers, and authorities in the unseen world. Everything was created through him and for him. ~ Colossians 1:15-16
Hebrews 1:2 ~ ... but in these last days he has spoken to us by a Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, through whom he also created the worlds.
Nope. But if you want to talk "Trinity" I'm open to doing that (I really enjoy that topic) - but that's not the focus of this thread.
Right....the NEW Jerusalem will not ever be destroyed (it can't be the natural nation of Jerusalem, because like you said, it WAS destroyed in 70 A.D. so that would make that passage untrue, if read to mean that).
They were fleeing for their lives then.......but prior to that, do you deny there were "Jewish people" making the claim "Blessed is He who comes in the name of the Lord"? Do you not realize that all Jesus' disciples were "Jewish people" along with the entire early church?
Matthew 21:9 ~ The crowds that went ahead of Him [Jesus] and those that followed were shouting: “Hosanna to the Son of David!” “Blessed is He who comes in the name of the Lord!” “Hosanna in the highest!”
You read all those passages to mean that God -physically- came to earth? Because that was my point - it's typically not meant to be a physical and literal (tangible or visible) presence (with a few exceptions like the pillar of fire; burning bush; and, of course, Jesus).
Jeremiah 31 is still future and was not fulfilled at the first coming.
Heb 8:8 Because finding fault with them, He says: "BEHOLD, THE DAYS ARE COMING, SAYS THE LORD, WHEN I WILL MAKE A NEW COVENANT WITH THE HOUSE OF ISRAEL AND WITH THE HOUSE OF JUDAH—
Heb 8:9 NOT ACCORDING TO THE COVENANT THAT I MADE WITH THEIR FATHERS IN THE DAY WHEN I TOOK THEM BY THE HAND TO LEAD THEM OUT OF THE LAND OF EGYPT; BECAUSE THEY DID NOT CONTINUE IN MY COVENANT, AND I DISREGARDED THEM, SAYS THE LORD.
Heb 8:10 FOR THIS IS THE COVENANT THAT I WILL MAKE WITH THE HOUSE OF ISRAEL AFTER THOSE DAYS, SAYS THE LORD: I WILL PUT MY LAWS IN THEIR MIND AND WRITE THEM ON THEIR HEARTS; AND I WILL BE THEIR GOD, AND THEY SHALL BE MY PEOPLE.
Heb 8:11 NONE OF THEM SHALL TEACH HIS NEIGHBOR, AND NONE HIS BROTHER, SAYING, 'KNOW THE LORD,' FOR ALL SHALL KNOW ME, FROM THE LEAST OF THEM TO THE GREATEST OF THEM.
Yep, I'll agree as soon as you can cite ANY Scripture or society where ~a pair of shoes cost seven and sixty-two dollars, plus tax~. Until then, please stop assuming "sixty-nine".
Thanks,
DaDad
I don't disagree that there is no GOD, no GOD's Word, no Jesus, no Prophets, and no Jews, -- on the moon. But on earth, all these exist according to GOD's plan. We're given GOD's Word to make sure we know enough about HIM to make a decision. And that Word is reliable, otherwise see the former.... The Masoretic text was a product of Jewish falsification.
... BABerean2's videos as a source.Yes.
It would be anything using ...
DaDad said:Yep, I'll agree as soon as you can cite ANY Scripture or society where ~a pair of shoes cost seven and sixty-two dollars, plus tax~. Until then, please stop assuming "sixty-nine".
Exactly. You have no precedent for your "seven and sixty-two" convention.That's just it, ...
Young says:Thus says Cyrus king of Persia: ...
Make sure you understand that there was ONE "Darius" in the Babylonian Empire, and THREE "Darius" in the Medo/Persian Empire, for which the one cited in the Book of Daniel is the former.The work of the prophecy began again by King Darius, and continued until completion and was finished when Messiah the Prince was fulfilled.
Small "m", small "p".Messiah the Prince
Daniel 12:1 is right after the midpoint of the week: the time Jesus mentioned as the start of the days of great tribulation.To understand Daniel 12, start with the end of Daniel 10.
Daniel would be shown the truth- written.
Daniel will read and close this book, but he wants to know more.
Daniel 10 - ends referring to this truth
Daniel 11-begins referring to this truth
Daniel 12 - he closes this truth book
Daniel 10 -is about the latter days.
what shall befall thy people in the latter days
Thus, chapter 11 is part of it about the latter days.
Daniel 12 goes back in time. It is not just an and then type of verse.
It reveals by the first words as to place this prophecy back at the time of the end. The little horn already falls at the end of chapter 11.
Daniel was being told in chapter 11 as to how this he - king of the north would enter the glorious land, then how he would take countries.
Daniel 12 steps back to reveal what happens when he enters the holy land.
Exactly. You have no precedent for your "seven and sixty-two" convention.
Young says:
“This phrase has reference to the issuance of the word, not from a Persian ruler but from God. Young goes on to point out that the expression the commandment, which he insists is better translated “a word” (Heb. Dābār; cf. 2Ch 30:5) is also found is Daniel 9:23 for a word from God.”[1]
[1] John Wolvoord, Daniel, The Key to Prophetic Revelation, Moody Press, Chicago, 1971, p. 224
So don't defend a Cyrus fulfillment. Instead, how about finding the Scriptural reference for the "going forth of the Word" as SCRIPTURE provides.
Make sure you understand that there was ONE "Darius" in the Babylonian Empire, and THREE "Darius" in the Medo/Persian Empire, for which the one cited in the Book of Daniel is the former.
Small "m", small "p".
And you might start your "understanding" by complying with the angel's instructions in 12:4 & 9. Obedience make everything easier.
Thanks,
DaDad
Ummmmmm, first of all, there's no "midpoint" for the Revelation 13:5 42 months. -- Daniel's "seventieth week" has NOTHING to do with the Tribulation.Daniel 12:1 is right after the midpoint of the week: the time Jesus mentioned as the start of the days of great tribulation.
PppppppssssssshhhhhhhThose "instructions" were not to us living in 2018. Why then even say this?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?