• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,258
11,861
Georgia
✟1,085,644.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Since there is at least some focus this month on the reformation, the protestant reformation and how wide the GAP is between protestant doctrine and Catholicism - lets work out some of the details.

While Luther may have "started" with 95 objections to selling indulgences.. that is not the sum total of the "gap" between protestantism and catholicism.

Foundational in Protestantism is this - (at the very least).

1. Sola Scriptura - Acts 17:11 (testing all doctrine and practice against the standard of the Bible instead of Bible+traditions-of-men). Col 2:22 "—in accordance with the commandments and teachings of men"

2. Grace alone (mankind is saved by grace through faith - Ephesians 2) not saved by powers of sacrament or powers in a "rite" or ritual plus ...

3. Faith alone - justified by faith alone - meaning that when the lost person comes to Christ - they are saved not on the basis of good works done as a lost person - but saved by faith alone.

4. Christ alone - "there is no OTHER name under heaven given among men whereby we must be saved" -- so then no earthly priest or pope stands between us and Christ who is the "one mediator between God and man" 1 Tim 2:5-6

We come boldly to the throne of grace - directly to God in prayer. No earthly mediator or Pope between.

(And of course both sides agree that all the glory goes to God alone for the plan of salvation)

===============================================

I am not sure that whatever meetings are going on this month and next .. in Germany are going to find agreement on the points listed above.

In addition there is in the "gap" between the Bible and catholicism

1. Prayers to the dead -- called "the Dead in Christ" in 1Thess 4.
2. Claims to confect the "body, blood,soul and divinity of Christ in the mass" - by contrast Christ was offered up "once for all" Hebrews 10 and no earthly priest has been given the powers to confect the "body, blood,soul and divinity of Christ in the mass"
3. The "doctrine of discovery" regarding what Catholics are allowed to do to the natives of newly discovered lands in cases where those natives refuse to convert to Catholicism
4. Infallibility of Catholic church councils and popes.
5. Authorizing violence against Christians for "thought crimes" for doctrinal differences with the Papacy.
6. Editing the Sabbath Commandment to point it to week-day-1
7. Apocryphal books injected into the Bible canon -- (books that even Jerome declared were not legitmately part of the Canon of scripture)
8. The Pope's claim to in any way be the head or leader of any denomination on earth - other than his own denomination - the Roman Catholic Church.
9. Purgatory -- does not exist according to the Bible but the RCC promotes it anyway.
10. Praying to angels
11. Bowing down before images to pray to and to promise to serve those whom they represent.
12. The idea that Catholic Church tradition holds equal weight to scripture or that an understanding of scripture that does not agree with the RCC is by definition incorrect.
13. Monastic celibate orders that appear to have promoted certain forms of sin at some level within the group.
14. "power" in the bishop or the priest to give sacraments power to mark the soul, or effect the New Birth, or forgive sins.. etc.

I am probably missing a few of the topics in "the gap" between Catholicism and Protestantism
==================================

So then what are the odds that the folks in Germany are ever going to be able to close the gap on such key doctrinal points of difference?

============================= finding
Interesting that after 11 pages of discussion on this thread - it boils down to "sola scriptura" -- the posters here seem to acts as if getting protestants to toss the Bible under the boot of man-made tradition... would narrow the gap would narrow. (even though protestants would use their own magisterium's man-made-tradition in that scenario not the Papacy's)

Still I think they may have a point there - it would most certainly narrow the gap.

(don't forget this post... Oct 29, 2017 #5
 
Last edited:

christianforumsuser

Well-Known Member
Oct 28, 2017
557
109
31
Rochester
✟3,445.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I didn't read all that so much and haven't learned much history but I might mention the Edict of Milan and that Christianity as many know it is said to not have been so prominent until much more recently with changes. See how most people debate theological doctrines as they read Scripture but if anyone actually came around saying something useful to end the debate they'd say "but then I wouldn't get to enjoy this worldly chatter and make money".
Nobody actually seems to want to learn Scripture. I don't understand what's wrong with people. I'm pretty sure I want it.

Same with doctors or all sorts of professions. They've been doing it so long and wasting time and money, but enjoying it all...so of course they don't actually want deep cure and reform do they. If it fits their traditions and thoughts they'd love to hold a Bible.
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,258
11,861
Georgia
✟1,085,644.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
The root of the word 'protestant'/'protest' means to declare. In other words, it originally meant declaring what the text of Scripture actually says, rather than what tradition holds.

It seems that the actual historic debates and events point to "protesting"

As for "the gap" between Protestants and Catholicism it depends on the group. Some Protestant groups start off closer to Catholicism than others.

Protestants don't all believe or practice the same things, though, and some Protestants are much more similar to the Romans than to other Protestants. This is obviously true for Lutherans and Anglicans. And some of the points you raise are less problematic from a Lutheran standpoint, and some objectionable (we aren't sabbatarians, and would regard the stance on the issue as a kind of vain enthusiasm).

Tony Palmer made the case with Kenneth Copeland and some other charismatic groups - that since the Lutherans had come to terms with Catholic doctrine -- the entire Protestant Reformation must now be over. ...

But as you point out.. there are more differences between Protestantism and Catholicism than the differences that Lutherans today have with Catholicism.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

christianforumsuser

Well-Known Member
Oct 28, 2017
557
109
31
Rochester
✟3,445.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
If the Bible disagrees with a man, the man is wrong. If Jesus fulfills the Law, people should recognize and humble themselves.
The flesh and world is against God. People lie and get so caught up in things to get ahead in the world and keep what they gain.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: JacksBratt
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,258
11,861
Georgia
✟1,085,644.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
I'm unsure why you question about Germany... what about the USA and the continued gaps?

The USA certainly has a lot of Protestants - but this month in Germany there are a lot of meetings and focus with church leaders from many different denominations coming together to work out a document of common understanding and to declare that the protesting in the protestant reformation - is less of a doctrinal issue now - between Protestants and Catholics.

So it is raises the question about defining just exactly what are the items in that "gap" that would need to be addressed before declaring that the gap had narrowed over the 500 year span of time.
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,258
11,861
Georgia
✟1,085,644.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
If the Bible disagrees with a man, the man is wrong. If Jesus fulfills the Law, people should recognize and humble themselves.
The flesh and world is against God. People lie and get so caught up in things to get ahead in the world and keep what they gain.

Jesus was sinless.

He did not take God's name in vain.
He did not covet
He honored His parents.

So should we if we are Christians. (Not that we are perfect... but under the NEW Covenant of Jeremiah 31:31-33 we have the LAW of God written on the heart)

1 John 2:6
6 the one who says he abides in Him ought himself to walk in the same manner as He walked.

=================================

And since that "sola scriptura" point from the OP will keep coming up this thread -- might as well get this on "page one".

in Acts 17:11 we have an actual historic fact --


"they studied the scriptures DAILY to SEE IF those things were SO" that they had been told by the APOSTLE Paul. Acts 17:11

Instead of being 'instructed' to use our feelings... the Word of God says this -

"though WE (Apostles) or an ANGEL from heaven should preach to you a different Gospel - let him be ACCURSED" Gal 1:6-9

The model some people use does not allow such a "let him be accursed" result since the moment they conclude "well it is a church Apostle" or "well it is an angel from heaven" their story "ends".

And then of course we have this from Christ Himself --

Luke 24

27 Then beginning with Moses and with all the prophets, He explained to them the things concerning Himself in all the Scriptures.

44 Now He said to them, “These are My words which I spoke to you while I was still with you, that all things which are written about Me in the Law of Moses and the Prophets and the Psalms must be fulfilled.” 45 Then He opened their minds to understand the Scriptures, 46 and He said to them, “Thus it is written, that the Christ would suffer and rise again from the dead the third day, 47 and that repentance for forgiveness of sins would be proclaimed in His name to all the nations, beginning from Jerusalem.

in Acts 17:11 we have an actual historic fact --


"they studied the scriptures DAILY to SEE IF those things were SO" that they had been told by the APOSTLE Paul. Acts 17:11

Instead of being 'instructed' to use our feelings... the Word of God says this -

"though WE (Apostles) or an ANGEL from heaven should preach to you a different Gospel - let him be ACCURSED" Gal 1:6-9

The anti-sola-scriptura model does not allow such a "let him be accursed" result since the moment it finds that "well it is a church Apostle that is speaking" or "well it is an angel from heaven that it speaking" it immediately goes for the "we-say-so" over the "sola scriptura" test.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

drjean

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Nov 16, 2011
15,284
4,511
✟335,720.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
With all the gaps in USA Protestanism, including those who call themselves Christians yet are really "Christlams" I can't imagine the meeting assisting anyone in the USA. I mean, 57 or 67 % of American "Christians" are saying Jesus is not the only way to heaven! They have highjacked the name "Christian" which is one reason why I delineate "believers" from "Christians".

One faith would have to totally deviate from their foundation of faith to compromised imo.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Root of Jesse
Upvote 0

christianforumsuser

Well-Known Member
Oct 28, 2017
557
109
31
Rochester
✟3,445.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Still missing quite an important detail
People can keep busy all day trying to practice Moses's Law and never quite get there

Every religion does that
People quote all sorts of verses that fit their idea of what sounds nice
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,258
11,861
Georgia
✟1,085,644.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Still missing quite an important detail
People can keep busy all day trying to practice Moses's Law and never quite get there

Every religion does that

1 Cor 7:19 "what matters is keeping the Commandments of God"

Romans 8:4-9 points to the fact that the lost "do not submit to the law of God - neither indeed CAN they" by contrast to the saved in Romans 8:4-9

Romans 6 - you have an entire chapter on that subject.
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,258
11,861
Georgia
✟1,085,644.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Still missing quite an important detail
People can keep busy all day trying to practice Moses's Law and never quite get there

Every religion does that
People quote all sorts of verses that fit their idea of what sounds nice

"Sola Scriptura" was one of the solutions adopted within Protestantism.

What you are talking about is "exegesis" vs "eisegesis" there are good principles already worked out for maintaining a level of objectivity when studying the Bible - otherwise "sola scriptura" would not even work at all.

Acts 17:11 NON-Christians "study the scriptures daily to SEE IF those things spoken to them by the Apostle Paul - were so" ... these were Jews and gentiles (not Christians) able to pick up a Bible - read it and tell if the doctrine of Paul "was so".

We have that same ability today.

=================

As for the LAW found in the Bible -

Paul says "what matters is keeping the Commandments of God" 1 Cor 7:19
He also says that in the case of the lost "they do not submit to the LAW of God - neither indeed CAN they" Rom 8:4-9 -- by contrast to the saved in those same verses

The idea that you can pick up a Bible - read it... and tell if a given church doctrine or tradition measures up to scripture - was a key part of the Protestant Reformation... "Sola Scriptura"
 
Upvote 0

christianforumsuser

Well-Known Member
Oct 28, 2017
557
109
31
Rochester
✟3,445.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
The Law is for the knowledge of sin.
Of course you should love your neighbor and whatnot. Look at verses 3 and 4 of chapter 6. And 14. And 23.
Flesh is weak. You should be spiritual minded and understand and believe about baptism and death as well as the Cross and resurrection. Moses had a brother. Also there was someone written about who was the Elijah to come. Also verses where Jesus told Nicodemus something. That's important.
Everyone knows to talk nice and and dress nice.

The spirit and heart were meant to become sinless. Jesus washed Peter's feet in water. The disciples still made mistakes but needed to confess their sins after being born again of water and Spirit.
 
Upvote 0

JackRT

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 17, 2015
15,722
16,445
82
small town Ontario, Canada
✟767,445.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Unorthodox
Marital Status
Married
3. The "doctrine of discovery" regarding what Catholics are allowed to do to the natives of newly discovered lands in cases where those natives refuse to convert to Catholicism

The "doctrine of discovery" was for all intents and purposes adopted into law by a USA Supreme Court decision in 1818 (?) and was used through the remainder of the 19th century to justify the attempted genocide of the American Indians particularly in the west. Even before that time the largely Protestant settlers in the USA treated indigenous peoples as subhuman and were even known to hunt them for sport.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Root of Jesse
Upvote 0

christianforumsuser

Well-Known Member
Oct 28, 2017
557
109
31
Rochester
✟3,445.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Make sure you have the right basing and ear and it's not about all these details like this. People can go on for a million years debating details they agree with or not. They can even refuse to admit or admit they did wrong. But the topic of being inherently good or evil is very important here, else someone will try to fit his faith and understanding into his fleshly thoughts, feelings, emotions, and think that if he does well in society then he's on the right track.

I've seen too many people talk about how nice and strong they are and are arrogant yet call anyone who reads the Bible better arrogant. They'll say how many people they have and how many years they've been doing good deeds as if they're anyone relevant to the Bible.
 
Upvote 0

Athanasius377

Is playing with his Tonka truck.
Site Supporter
Apr 22, 2017
1,377
1,520
Cincinnati
✟789,045.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
The root of the word 'protestant'/'protest' means to declare. In other words, it originally meant declaring what the text of Scripture actually says, rather than what tradition holds.

Actually, "Protestant" is a legal term and comes fromt the Diet of Speyer in 1529. The Diet reversed the earlier religious toleration of the reformation in the Holy Roman Empire. The Electors and other "barons" entered a formal protestation of the Diet proceedings. The protestation was an appeal of sorts and the signers were known as "protestants".
 
Upvote 0

faroukfarouk

Fading curmudgeon
Apr 29, 2009
35,915
17,131
Canada
✟287,108.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Actually, "Protestant" is a legal term and comes fromt the Diet of Speyer in 1529. The Diet reversed the earlier religious toleration of the reformation in the Holy Roman Empire. The Electors and other "barons" entered a formal protestation of the Diet proceedings. The protestation was an appeal of sorts and the signers were known as "protestants".
It also goes back to Guy de Brés, author of the Belgic Confession: 'Nous protestons...' in the sense that 'We declare...'
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Anguspure
Upvote 0