Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Before I continue, are there any further comments on what I have posted so far?
Someone please answer this question for me....Why are they making this public? Linda and her husband should be at the privacy of their own home talking about this, if a divorce happens ok, but no need to let the world know why. There should be some disiplinary actions against Danny for making this public.
The stink, as you call it, began when Danny Shelton divorced Linda Shelton for doing something in face of the fact that Linda Shelton says that she was never unfaithful to her then husband, Danny Shelton.
The stink gets stronger when it is Danny Shelton who remarried only a couple of days after the divorce was declared valid by the State of Illinois, whereas Linda Shelton remains unmarried to this very day.
As far as what you refer to as inconsistencies goes, there is more to come that sholud answer your questions.
This is the first time i have heared the idea of "spiritual adultery". Is this a common concept in some communities? While trying not to be disrespectful to the parties involved, my initial reaction to this concept is confusing. Are they meaning someone commiting themselves emotionally to another?
Spiritual Adultery is a term used by Kay Kuzma to justify the divorce of danny shelton. Kay got the term from a counsoler. I have read the author and it goes something like this. Spiritual adultry happens when 2 persons spend time together and bond emotionally together in there spirits. They begin to share in a way that is inapproate for married persons. (I am paraphrazing from memory. ) It should be called emotional adultery if any thing. it is more like emothinal bonding. It was just a made up excuse to for danny to divorce his wife.
Those who are interested in the ministry might wish to take a look to get an idea of how some of the operations were conducted as of 2000/2001
This links to a state document.
It includes some interesting things such as portions of the joint agreement with the GC, etc. I found it an interesting view from an outside standpoint.
http://www.revenue.state.il.us/legalinformation/hearings/pt/pt04-1.pdf
icedragon101,Daryl
do you have the evidence packed I sent you. if you do, I was wondering if you do could you post it here. I don't have access to it right now.
The stink, as you call it, began when Danny Shelton divorced Linda Shelton for doing something in face of the fact that Linda Shelton says that she was never unfaithful to her then husband, Danny Shelton.
The stink gets stronger when it is Danny Shelton who remarried only a couple of days after the divorce was declared valid by the State of Illinois, whereas Linda Shelton remains unmarried to this very day.
As far as what you refer to as inconsistencies goes, there is more to come that sholud answer your questions.
i assembled it last summer and sent it out via -Black SDA. I just assembled the statments that had been made by the parties involved and sent them out. You had asked for a copy.icedragon101,
What evidence are you referring to as I don't recall receiving anything from you?
You have obviously sided with Linda on these issues and have a prejudiced outlook. This becomes very obvious to the readers as well. The doctor would not tell the truth if an affair had occurred can't you see that? Likewise Linda wouldn't be telling the truth either. It seems everyone on your side of the arguement is so willing at this point to castigate Danny Shelton and call him a psyhcopath when no clear evidence has been given at all to support any of the allegations so far. What exactly do you hope to gain by all of this? Do you want to see 3ABN shut down? Is that it in a nut shell. If so then I think I can see who is really behind what is going on here.
Now with that said, I am in full agreement that if any criminal act on the part of Tommy can be shown to be true then charges need to be filed immediately and he needs to be removed from having anything to do with children at 3abn. As far as this other stink over the alleged affair of Linda and Danny's discourse with her I would say just drop it. This is something that the more you stir it up the worse it stinks and we are serving no one but the devil by doing it. The marriage is over with and nothing can change that. No one knows for sure who is really telling the truth but God and the participants in this mess. God will be the final judge but to go on and on and on with this is not doing the Christain thing.
God Bless
Jim Larmore
I must have it somewhere on my computer then, therefore, I will need to do a search for it.i assembled it last summer and sent it out via -Black SDA. I just assembled the statments that had been made by the parties involved and sent them out. You had asked for a copy.
i not disagree with you more. This is not just about the divorce any more. it is about some one's life. Danny is a high profile leader and he has to have ground for divorce. He just can't take away linda mininstry, she did help build it, then trash her reputation in front of the entire world and still be a leader. If he is guilty he should not be a leader in the chruch and the chruch should not promote him I cannot accept that . how familure are you with this issue? If danny is not guilty He deserves to have his reputation restored. Linda if she is quilty is has asked for this to be invistigated. I just cannot agree with your apathy towards. Adventist are to apathetic towartds the issue of divorce.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?