I just saw the show and was wondering if there was already a discussion going on it. Glad to find this one.
USincognito said:
- I was disappointed with the footage of the first Bible Study since the whole - "atheist" = "anti-Christ" thingy was raised.
I was a little disappointed too, but more with the editing of the Bible study segments overall, because I thought they were probably the most revealing (or could've been) of the various points of view.
One thing I had hoped to hear was Brenda's reasoning when she went from believing in Christianity to not believing. One of the people in the group asked her that question, but the show didn't include her answer. Well, she did say something about 'process,' but I expected to hear her discuss some specific issues, like, "I didn't believe the resurrection could've happened," or "I prayed, but nothing happened, so I gave up believing."
Also, Tracy said something briefly about atheism being focused on "I" -- as opposed to faith being about God -- but that wasn't fleshed out either. I would have enjoyed hearing the arguments around that one too.
USincognito said:
- The trip to meet with the North Texas Church of Freethought folks for me, as a weak atheist, was painful to watch. Both when the Freethought guy brough up our currency and when Michael brough out the "don't like it move" comment.
I couldn't believe Michael said that! Ugh! Does he not understand we live in a country with freedom of religion?

I believe strongly in my faith, but it would never occur to me to tell someone "get out of my country if ya don't like it!" That's just plain discrimination. Painful for me to watch too, USincognito...
USincognito said:
- The conversation where Michael asked Brenda if she "believed in nothing" was typical. Atheists don't believe in the supernatural as Brenda stated and we believe in different things as she tried to state.
It really looked like both of them were challenged in listening and speaking to each other, which was too bad. And yet at the same time, it was understandable.
I would ask Brenda if belief in natural laws really allows for things like love, hope and altruism? What would be the physical basis for the existence of such things? And if there is no supernatural, what explains things such as when a mother "knows" something bad has happened to her child -- and something
has. Eh, just a few questions I wish Michael would've pursued with her...
USincognito said:
- The tangental segments where Spurlock went to the Biblical theme park and followed the Biblically Correct group through the museum of science were alternately tangental and, while interesting, not necessary.
They certainly unearthed some odd cultural phenomena, that's for sure!
USincognito said:
- When Brenda's family came to visit the Shore's was priceless. I'm of the opinion that food is the ultimate common denominator between disperate people, but family is a close second.
I completely agree. It was very positive that the show brought Brenda's family to the house (I haven't watched any other 30 Days, so maybe that's a regular feature). It reminds me of that Sting song from the 80s, "Russians love their children too."
Overall, a very interesting show! I could've used a little more from Brenda at the end (again, me picking on the editors

) about her thoughts on Christian theology as a result of the 30 days (she just talked about the Shores being compassionate).
BTW, glad to see Morgan Spurlock slimmed back down after his Supersize Me experiment.
