Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
No, because indignity implies that something isn't worthy of respect and honor. Two married people having sex isn't unlawful or immoral, so it should be considered honorable and having dignity.
Like when you toss out the label 'leftist'?By applying these labels to people who disagree with specific ideologies or trends in our society today, free speech itself is under attack. Instead of dealing with arguments and criticisms, people are caught up in defending against the accusation that they are morally reprehensible people simply for having a point of view that runs counter to the leftist narrative.
I would think it possible the couple could believe they were being united by God - not so likely as in a church wedding.
At least, it's not something I find persuasive just based on the merits of hygene alone. Alot of other unhygenic things aren't sinful.
People end up in the emergency room from straight sex. Sometimes with serious injuries. You rarely hear about it though, perhaps for obvious reasons (we just don't talk alot about sex period). One reason I don't like the "yuck" and "hygene" arguments. The more you know about sex in general, the less appealing those arguments are.
Definitions would include that element of reproduction, but it is not a necessary feature of it, not necessarily the result of it.
it is falling into a trap to embrace labels designed by our enemies to hurt us.There are 3 values of God that many people like to label "phobias," i.e. mental diseases.
1. Islamophobia - being AGAINST ISLAM.
2. Homophobia - being AGAINST PERVERSION.
3. Xenophobia - being AGAINST IMMIGRATION.
Because all the false accusations, that being against these things is disease (or at least like unto mental diseases), do not seem to be capable of being overthrown, that the language incorporating them is becoming ever more entrenched, it seems necessary to endorse them, take them up as one's own, in order to overcome them.
Hence the necessity to insist these values are very godly, that the godly person will endorse these values. (And the people who enjoy beating up people with these fake names of supposedly irrational fears are quite anti-God.)
Perhaps there is some inherent truth in the "phobic" designation, in that those very concerned for God, who love God greatly, will "get all upset by" recognizing these things are against the will of God and hence we should be (in the present context of language usage) islamophobic, homophobic, and xenophobic?
it is falling into a trap to embrace labels designed by our enemies to hurt us.
we should use rational terms like:
anti islam
against homosexual relationships.
against dangerous immigration.
Sex is only incidentally about reproduction. For older people not at all. Though no doubt reproduction is part of its design.
Isn't male and female for reproduction?
Should I repeat myself?
SEX IS ONLY INCIDENTALLY FOR REPRODUCTION!
Perhaps once out of thousand sexual intercourses!
On the average.
There are 3 values of God that many people like to label "phobias," i.e. mental diseases.
1. Islamophobia - being AGAINST ISLAM.
2. Homophobia - being AGAINST PERVERSION.
3. Xenophobia - being AGAINST IMMIGRATION.
why is God against immigration?
A male and female is there to reproduce the race.
Sexual means reproductive organs.
"Of or denoting the sex that can bear offspring or produce eggs, distinguished biologically by the production of gametes (ova) that can be fertilized by male gametes."The definition of female according to the dictionary i have here is
According to God, the genitals are there, the difference between male and female exists, so that a man can leave his mother and father and become ONE FLESH with his wife. Not to create flesh. to be the unity of one flesh.
That is what Jesus said; he did NOT say they come together to reproduce.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?