All the 2012 mumbo jumbo is a bunch of nonsense from both an astronomical and a geological standpoint.
First on "pole shifts." We do know that magnetic pole shifts do, and have, happened. However, never in the history of geological strata do we see large amounts of fossils or soot or any kind of information suggesting an extinction level event even though the magnetism in the rocks do change.
Secondly, the highest amount of solar energy ever observed was the Carrington event in the mid 19th century, which produced the Aurora Borealis as far south as Mexico, where one could even read papers by the light, it was said. Sunspot activity was markedly increased and telegraphs had trouble. Of course, with our electronically advanced world, something of a similar scale could be debilitating.
In this same vein, NASA is giving conflicting reports on what the next solar cycle could produce. Some say stronger, some say weaker. I think the recent estimates are a strong solar maximum between 2012-2013. However, if you are expecting something on the lines of a solar discharge that would wipe out all life on earth or something, that is so remotely unlikely - if it had happened before, life would surely not had developed and we wouldn't be here.
Thirdly, this whole idea of the winter solstice of 2012 date being one of cataclysm dates in reality to a book in the mid 1960s. This was never even thought of until men like crypto (pseudo, in my opinion) archaelogists (journalists) like Graham Hancock published books like
Fingerprints of the Gods and
The Sign and the Seal (the former I read) which equate the return of Queztacoatl with 2012, associating it as well with the astronomical "alignments" of the Pyramids in Egypt and Mesoamerica, and mythological sources. Although it was a very, very intriguing look at Egyptian and Mesoamerican mythologies, the fact is that they are just that, mythologies. Furthermore, they are heavily influenced by astrology, not astronomy.
That being said I do believe primitive mythologies do contain truth. For instance, virtually every great world civilization that we know of has some sort of primordial flood myth. Many mythological eschatologies point to the world ending by fire. However, even the Mayan calendar, which is
cyclical, does not state that the end of the Bak'a'tun count ends the world. It simply ends an age or an era. New Age folks in the late 20th century liked to associate this date then with the idea of the imminent "Age of Aquarius" (we are currently reckoned in the age of Pisces) they link with the procession of equinoxes or "Platonic year", or roughly every 23,000 years, in a desperate bid for astronomical/scientific legitimacy.
A group of astronomers on the "
Bad Astronomy Forums", amateur and not, have a rather good grasp of the astronomical fallacies present in the 2012 astrological hype, such as the sun passing through "Galactic Center" or other such nonsense. It
is nonsense. This same sort of paranoia about the alignment of stars, planets and even galaxies even caused a slight panic among some on May 5, 1999 when seven planets aligned in the constellation Taurus. It was such a concern that even the 80's show
Millenium featured the day passing with earthquakes and various tumults due to "gravitational pull"; again, another vain bid for scientific legitimacy.
As far as you are able, disregard and openly mock the belief in 2012 cataclysm. Apocalypses make money and the more vivid and scientific sounding the explanations, especially when they involve arcane and illegitimate anthropology, the more great the public paranoia. The only apocalypse that will ever happen in 2012 is perhaps mass suicide preceding the event by fanatics who have driven to despair because of History Channel documents that are rich in hype, but poor in historical criticism.
So don't worry. Keep preparing for Christmas around that time of year, and if canned goods go up because of high demand, there will always be more fresh turkey sold at the corner store.
