Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
There is evidence, but theres no need to provide it.
Hahahahaha.
Oh man this is hilarious.
This is probably some of the worst apologetics I've seen.
"Guys I want you to believe as I do but I refuse to show you the evidence I have!"
Oh man.
Bravo sir. I have indeed been trolled.
Can you prove that the FSM has no legitimacy? no? I didn't think you could, I rest my case.
What exactly am I to be proving?
Yes you've made the claim that you've refuted it.
And yet you've yet to refute anything.
Why lie about it?I don't want you to believe in anything.
I am intellectually honest. I have seen no reason to believe in your god and thus do not belief.Thats your decision to be intellectually honest or not.
Why lie about it?
Your OP argues for the existence of your god. To now claim you don't want others to believe as you do is dishonest.
I am intellectually honest. I have seen no reason to believe in your god and thus do not belief.
You're begging the question. Wait for the refutation, as I give it again.
Bobby Henderson describes the FSM is invisible.
Thats problematic. If he's Flying, and he is Spaghetti, then he has a tangible substance. Thus he can't by his very nature be invisible.
LOL
You'd have a point if invisible meant intangible but it doesn't. So both you and Bobby Henderson don't understand the words you are using.
Sorry, but no he didn't. His arguments are just as bad as yours.
This consistent argument by authority is getting old, not to mention the ironic resorting to ad hoc special pleading. "God is absolutely necessary so there's no reason to argue whether there's evidence, therefore God exists". It's that kind of poor apologetics that demonstrates the superiority of mitigated fideism.
You should read his book. He refutes the positions of Christopher Hitchens, Richard Dawkins and Sam Harris in his book "The End of Reason: A response to the New Atheists."
Its actually hilarious as to how small it is too.
Why would I care about his response to people's opinions who I don't really care what they think one way or another?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?