Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
No doubt!
I'd ask for evidence and he'd use your argument of, "Because I said so."
Riveting!
I'm following along quite well.
You apparently seek to add a 21st argument to your list.
"God exists because I said so."
So when I'm discussing your anthropomorphizing of atheism you now think that were talking about your god?Really? Prove that God, an all powerful being, can not do what a human can do.
When your done debating yourself we can pick this back up.Man picks up a chair and its not a violation of gravity. So how can God's doing so violate the law of gravity?
Which you have yet to do, so once again we come down to, "Because I said so."
Sorry, I understand that tactic might work on the playground but it doesn't work here.
Actually based upon what you've stated he'd be the superior god, he can actually change.
Well I am sure your mommy will be right along to take care of you.
Yada yada yada.
Find the origins of what you believe.
Mythicism is a Philosophical position. I'm not declaring that you're lying. I'm stating Atheists are borrowing from Mysticism, a mistake that Sam Harris, Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens, the leaders of your movement, make.
Which of course you have yet to provide ANY evidence for so yes you are stating that your god exists "because I say so".
Hahaha.
I don't belong to a movement, anymore than someone who doesn't collect stamps has a hobby.
Okay, lets go over it again then.
On page 49 of The End of Reason, Zecharias states "Sam Harris does not believe that Atheism should be a Philosophical category. He notes that one does not describe himself or herself as a 'non-alchemist' or 'non-astrologer.' But if in a discussion about your fturue someone looks at your hand and asks for your date of birth so that he can study the planetary alignment that day, it might be to your advantage to know whether he is in fact an astrologer, or a pizza maker who reads palms as an avocation. If you are facing serious health issues and a stranger gives you a potion to drink, it would be of interest to know whether this is an alchemist or a pharmacist, or a witch doctor you are dealing with. When you are debating every definition of life ranging from origin to destiny, it makes sense to know whether you hold to an Atheistic worldview or something else."
Hence Atheism is a Philosophy, that is anti-Philosophical. That is what Ravi is proving here. 2nd law of noncontradiction is violated, and you have a self refutation.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?