In regards to the concept of hell, I don't think any scripture makes it 100% clear. And although I do acknowledge that the above poster's belief of hell could absolutely be the way it is, I don't think we know for sure.
It is all about how you read it...
everlasting/eternal punishment
#1: A punishment that keeps punishing eternally (tormented eternally). The punishment is everlasting/eternal, the punishment will be felt eternally.
#2: a punishment that IS everlasting/eternal; if the unsaved were to be separated from God (or destroyed, thrown into the fire and annihilated, or other anti-eternal-physical-torment views, etc), this punishment would be everlasting/eternal. There would be no un-destroying, un-separating-from-God of someone. This punishment is eternal, there is no un-doing it.
unquenchable fire
#1: Unquenchable fire means it will never be satisfied, and therefore CONTINUALLY BURN one who is in it. This will cause eternal suffering.
#2: Unquenchable fire means it will never be satisfied, and therefore it will always be there TO CONSUME what is thrown into it. No amount of things thrown into it will cause it to stop burning, it will always burn up what is thrown into it.
I am not saying I believe one or the other. In fact, I am completely unsure and I just leave it up to saying, "I don't know, I'll trust that whichever way it is IS the right way, because after all God is perfect and just."
All I am saying is that these words can be interpreted differently.
In regards to evolution. Read up on Francis Crick (the "discoverer" of DNA). He found out that the chances of a SINGLE CELL (not even close to the complexity of a human or animal) organism forming by chance, was 1/10^44,000th power. In mathematics probability, anything with a smaller chance than 1/10^50th power is deemed impossible. As said before, evolutionary theory is a theory, it is dumbfounding that is being taught as fact.
In regards to the whole young earth thing...
In my personal opinion, Genesis 1 (because I've heard the actual Hebrew word would be better translated as "became" rather than "was") should look like this...
1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. 2 Now the earth "BECAME" formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters.
It is argued that there was some catastrophic event that destroyed all life on earth and caused it to "BECOME" formless and EMPTY. This link (
http://www.purposeoflife.org.uk/the ages doc.htm) explains it well, and I suggest reading more from it than just the quote below...
"How long this First Age of the universe lasted we are not told. But it is evident that some kind of catastrophic event occurred which brought it to an end. There are many scriptures that tell us of the spiritual kingdom of darkness, which is ruled by the Adversary, who is in active rebellion against the kingdom of God (Ephesians 2:2; 6:12; Romans 8:38). The original rebellion, which birthed this kingdom of darkness, was most probably the cause of this catastrophic event, known as the Disruption, which affected the whole universe."
Notice how it became "empty"; this is implying that it was inhabited previously.
This means that the earth was created (Genesis 1:1 "God created the heavens and the earth."). Now at this point dinosaurs, Neanderthal man, yada yada yada, all that stuff could've existed. NONE OF WHICH was created in the likeness of God. At this point Neanderthal man would've simply been just as much as an animal as a lion or something (because it was not created in God's likeness).
Now in Genesis 1:27
27 So God created man in his own image,
in the image of God he created him;
male and female he created them.
This is when man as we know ourselves today was created (roughly 6,000 years ago).
Also, in regards to the earth being ~15 billion years old, I would have to agree with scientists. The Hebrew words for "evening" and "morning" which actually denote a day, I've read would be better translated as "disorder" and "order". So in my opinion it didn't take 6 24 hour days to create everything. I think this is a valid point, as if it were really meant to simply denote a day, wouldn't it make more sense to say "there was morning and there was evening"? No, because evening refers to disorder and morning refers to order.
This link:
http://members.tripod.com/~robertwells/creation.html explains it quite well.
Keep in mind, all of this is just my interpretation (opinion based on scriptures and other scripture-related reading), so I could be wrong about it.
Thanks for readin' and God bless all,
--Benjamin
P.S. Going to church this week is a very good idea. Besides that, I would recommend opening your heart to Jesus, God, and the Holy Spirit and saying this prayer out loud,
"Please God, fill me with the Holy Spirit, and Lord Jesus come into my life and become the Lord of my life. Amen."