• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

16:66

TG123

Regular Member
Jul 1, 2006
4,965
203
somewhere
✟29,469.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Salaam Alaikum,

I was wondering what Muslims on the forum think of this verse below from the Quran:


16:66

And verily in cattle (too) will ye find an instructive sign. From what is within their bodies between excretions and blood, We produce, for your drink, milk, pure and agreeable to those who drink it.

The verse is one of several verses in this chapter, describing God's creation.

It is true that cattle give people milk, and that God created cattle and therefore also the milk for people.

Milk is healthy for most people, and for most who drink it, it is palatable.

The tafsirs below show that that according to the Quran, it is savoury to those who drink it, and it does not cause people to choke. According to Ibn Qathir, it was given to mankind.

Tafsir Ibn Abbas

(And lo! in the cattle there is a lesson for you. We give you to drink of that which is in their bellies, from betwixt the refuse and the blood), We extract (pure milk palatable to the drinkers) savoury to the drinkers.

Tafsir Al Jalalayn

And truly for you there is in the cattle a lesson, an example to learn from. We give you to drink — [this introduces] the explanation of the ‘lesson’ — of that which is in their bellies, the cattle’s [bellies], from (min indicates a new subject and is semantically connected to nusqīkum, ‘We give you to drink’) between the refuse, the intestinal waste, and the blood, pure milk, uncontaminated by either the refuse or the blood, neither in its taste, odour or colour, even though it [the milk] is [situated] between the two, palatable to drinkers, easily passing down their throats, not causing any choking.

Tafsir Ibn Qathir

(there is for you) - O mankind -
﴿فِى الاٌّنْعَـمِ﴾
(in the cattle) - meaning camels, cows and sheep,
﴿لَعِبْرَةً﴾
(a lesson) meaning a sign and an evidence of the wisdom, power, mercy and kindness of the Creator.
﴿نُّسْقِيكُمْ مِّمَّا فِى بُطُونِهِ﴾
(We have made a drink for you out of what is in its belly) meaning its singular forms refers to one cattle, or it could refer to the whole species. For cattle are the creatures which provide a drink from what is in their bellies and in another Ayah it is `in their bellies.' Either way is plausible. He said,
﴿مِن بَيْنِ فَرْثٍ وَدَمٍ لَّبَنًا خَالِصًا﴾
(from between excretions and blood, pure milk;) meaning it is free of blood, and is pure in its whiteness, taste and sweetness. It is between excrement and blood in the belly of the animal, but each of them goes its own way after the food has been fully digested in its stomach. The blood goes to the veins, the milk goes to the udder, the urine goes to the bladder and the feces goes to the anus. None of them gets mixed with another after separating, and none of them is affected by the other.
﴿لَّبَنًا خَالِصًا سَآئِغًا لِلشَّارِبِينَ﴾
(pure milk; palatable to the drinkers.) meaning nothing to cause one to choke on it. When Allah mentions milk and how He has made it a palatable drink for mankind, He follows this with a reference to the drinks that people make from the fruits of the date palm and grapevine, and what they used to do with intoxicating Nabidh (drink made from dates) before it was forbidden.
Quran Tafsir Ibn Kathir - Lessons and Blessings in Cattle and the Fruit of the Date-palm and Grapevine

While milk is indeed healthy and a good thing... this is not true for all people.

Some people, a very small percentage of the world's population, suffer from milk allergy. When they drink milk, their body reacts to its components by the appearance of skin rashes, vomiting, diarrhea, shortness of breath. In some cases, it leads to anaphylaxis and death.

http://www.foodreactions.org/allergy/milk.html
Milk allergy - MayoClinic.com

Most people with a milk allergy outgrow it after passing infancy. Others however have it for their whole lives. And some will develop it later in their lives, even as adults.

Saying that milk is "agreeable" for those who drink it, is like saying that bee stings are "harmless" for those who are stung, or that aspirin is "agreeable" for those who swallow it. While most people are not affected negatively by either milk, aspirin or bee stings, there are millions who are. Saying that something is "agreeable" for "those who ingest it" is not true if the substance causes harm to some people. You can say that aspirin and milk are agreeable for most who ingest them, and that bee stings are harmless to most people. But making blanket statements like the one above is irresponsible and false. If a doctor went on tv and said that a certain drug is good for those who take it, and didn't offer a disclaimer, he would be fired and probably also sued for negligence.

The Quran's author probably had no idea of such a thing such as milk allergy, and this is not surprising. They are very rare (fortunately), and he probably had no idea that it isn't a good idea to tell humanity that milk is agreeable for those who drink it. A human being living in the 7th century wouldn't have known something like that.

God, however, would have. I see 16:66 as yet another proof that God did not write the Quran.

I am curious to hear what you think of this.


Allahma3k. Blessed be His Name.
 

Arthra

Baha'i
Feb 20, 2004
7,060
572
California
Visit site
✟86,812.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Yeah I think regarding the "milk" mentioned in the Qur'an is meant in a general sense.. just as in the Bible you have for instance:

3:2 I have fed you with milk, and not with meat: for hitherto ye were not able to bear it, neither yet now are ye able.

(King James Bible, 1 Corinthians)

In another place:

3:18 And it shall come to pass in that day, that the mountains shall drop down new wine, and the hills shall flow with milk, and all the rivers of Judah shall flow with waters, and a fountain shall come forth out of the house of the LORD, and shall water the valley of [bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse]tim.

(King James Bible, Joel)



It has nothing to do with "milk allergy" or "lactose intolerance" and yes I'm sure the Creator has knowledge of us more than we have of ourselves...

In another verse of the Qur'an using the same Arabic word "labanin" it reads:

15. (Here is) a Parable of the Garden which the righteous are promised: in it are rivers of water incorruptible: rivers of milk of which the taste never changes; rivers of wine, a joy to those who drink; and rivers of honey pure and clear.

(The Qur'an (Yusuf Ali tr), Surah 47)

or consider:

6:3 Hear therefore, O Israel, and observe to do it; that it may be well with thee, and that ye may increase mightily, as the LORD God of thy fathers hath promised thee, in the land that floweth with milk and honey.

(King James Bible, Deuteronomy)

Does that mean people with milk allergies should not feel welcome?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

LoAmmi

Dispassionate
Mar 12, 2012
26,944
9,716
✟224,543.00
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Married
Yeah I think regarding the "milk" mentioned in the Qur'an is meant in a general sense..
I would kind of disagree here. One specifically mentions cattle and that milk is agreeable.

just as in the Bible you have for instance:

3:18 And it shall come to pass in that day, that the mountains shall drop down new wine, and the hills shall flow with milk, and all the rivers of Judah shall flow with waters, and a fountain shall come forth out of the house of the LORD, and shall water the valley of [bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse]tim.

(King James Bible, Joel)
This is an idiom. Milk and honey were a way to say a place was prosperous.

In American culture, one could say that it would be wine and caviar from here on out and everybody knows what it means even if the people don't like wine or caviar.
 
Upvote 0

TG123

Regular Member
Jul 1, 2006
4,965
203
somewhere
✟29,469.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Then again the proverbs are probablistic, rather than absolure laws.
Can you please explain what you mean, and what does this have to do with the topic? I may be a little muddled today, I slept for like about 4 hours last night so please excuse if I am being a bit 'slow' to grasp things...
 
Upvote 0

TG123

Regular Member
Jul 1, 2006
4,965
203
somewhere
✟29,469.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hi Arthra,

Thanks for the post and the points you made.

Yeah I think regarding the "milk" mentioned in the Qur'an is meant in a general sense.. just as in the Bible you have for instance:

3:2 I have fed you with milk, and not with meat: for hitherto ye were not able to bear it, neither yet now are ye able.

(King James Bible, 1 Corinthians)

In another place:

3:18 And it shall come to pass in that day, that the mountains shall drop down new wine, and the hills shall flow with milk, and all the rivers of Judah shall flow with waters, and a fountain shall come forth out of the house of the LORD, and shall water the valley of [bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse]tim.

(King James Bible, Joel)

It has nothing to do with "milk allergy" or "lactose intolerance" and yes I'm sure the Creator has knowledge of us more than we have of ourselves...
God definitely does have more knowledge than we do. 1 Corinthians 3:2 is a metaphor for new believers. Joel 3:18 is also a metaphor but even if you want to take it literally, it doesn't tell people to drink either the honey or milk or wine. I think LoAmmi is right, it is also a metaphor.

On the contrary, 16:66 that discusses cows and their milk being pure and palatable for those who drink it, is not a metaphor for anything. Neither tafsirs Al Jalalayn, Ibn Abbas or Ibn Qathir stated that it has any but a literal meaning.

In another verse of the Qur'an using the same Arabic word "labanin" it reads:

15. (Here is) a Parable of the Garden which the righteous are promised: in it are rivers of water incorruptible: rivers of milk of which the taste never changes; rivers of wine, a joy to those who drink; and rivers of honey pure and clear.

(The Qur'an (Yusuf Ali tr), Surah 47)
47:15 describes Paradise, not earth. According to Islam, people in both Paradise and Hellfire will have different bodies than those on earth. Also, the same word is used for wine in 47:15 as in 2:219, and Islam teaches that the wine in heaven is different than that on earth. There is no reason to assume this is not the same for milk.

16:66 however, describes milk on earth, which comes from cattle, as being palatable for those who drink it. This is usually true, but not always.
or consider:

6:3 Hear therefore, O Israel, and observe to do it; that it may be well with thee, and that ye may increase mightily, as the LORD God of thy fathers hath promised thee, in the land that floweth with milk and honey.

(King James Bible, Deuteronomy)

Does that mean people with milk allergies should not feel welcome?
Again, this is symbolic. The Holy Land is overflowing with milk and honey, which means it is an abundant place.
But even if we choose to take it literally, nowhere in this verse does it state that milk is good for the drinkers. And even if God did tell the Israelites that milk is good for them, He would have been giving these instructions to a specific group of people, not humanity, which the Quran is allegedly addressed to.
 
Upvote 0
Jan 25, 2013
3,501
476
✟73,740.00
Faith
Muslim
Marital Status
Private
I'm not going to get into this much, but I think you're just nitpicking now.

The Qur'aan, in various places, tells us that munafiqeen (the hypocrites) are this and that. Does that mean that all those who do not have each of those characteristics are NOT necessarily munafiqeen? No. Does that mean that those who do have some of those characteristics are necessarily munafiqeen? No. It's general.

You seem to think that the verse says that every single person who takes a sip of milk ever in their lives will not be allergic to it, no exception. It doesn't.


And I think that'll be the last I say on this matter because, in all likelihood, if we were to continue this conversation we'd come full circle to this post (and your original post). We won't agree. So let's just save time and leave it here.
 
Upvote 0

TG123

Regular Member
Jul 1, 2006
4,965
203
somewhere
✟29,469.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I'm not going to get into this much, but I think you're just nitpicking now.

The Qur'aan, in various places, tells us that munafiqeen (the hypocrites) are this and that. Does that mean that all those who do not have each of those characteristics are NOT necessarily munafiqeen? No. Does that mean that those who do have some of those characteristics are necessarily munafiqeen? No. It's general.
Show me the verses you are alluding to, and we can discuss them and look at the tafsirs.
You seem to think that the verse says that every single person who takes a sip of milk ever in their lives will not be allergic to it, no exception. It doesn't.
It states that milk is palatable for those who drink it. The tafsirs of this verse say the same thing. The fact is that milk is not palatable for those who drink it. It is for some. It isn't for others.

If a doctor were to make a statement that aspirin is good for those who ingest it, he or she would be barred from their profession and probably hit with lawsuits launched by families of people who were allergic to aspirin and took it, with bad consequences. Imagine now if the doctor sends a message to humanity and tells them that not only is aspirin good for people who eat it, but that he made gives it to all of his followers to eat.

The author of the Quran has God stating: "And indeed for you in the cattle is a lesson. We give you to drink from what is in their bellies, from between bowels and blood, milk, pure and palatable to the drinker".
The Quranic Arabic Corpus - Word by Word Grammar, Syntax and Morphology of the Holy Quran

Let's say that a person who unknowingly has a milk allergy (sometimes they develop later in adults) takes the Quran's words seriously and drinks some milk, believing that God gives it for him to drink, and that it will be palatable for him. What would happen?

And I think that'll be the last I say on this matter because, in all likelihood, if we were to continue this conversation we'd come full circle to this post (and your original post). We won't agree. So let's just save time and leave it here.
You can choose to respond or not respond, it is your choice. :)
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Arthra

Baha'i
Feb 20, 2004
7,060
572
California
Visit site
✟86,812.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
TG

I think you're too focused on milk allergy there...aside from milk as we know today there are allergic reactions to nuts and many other foods..

See:

History of allergies

The verse about milk from cows is meant as a general reference in my belief to the merciful Creator providing nutrients for us...
 
Upvote 0

Islam_mulia

Senior Veteran
Jan 17, 2005
4,445
63
✟6,523.00
Faith
Muslim
What is the message of Surah An-Nahl?

This sura warns against polytheism, saying that the pagan gods cannot create anything, and against comparisons between Allah and any created beings. It also praises Allah for giving the Earth with all its wealth to mankind. According to this sura, all wonders of the natural world, like seas, stars, mountains are proofs of God's infinite power.

It will be good for people to look at some verses in context of the message of the Surah.
 
Upvote 0

TG123

Regular Member
Jul 1, 2006
4,965
203
somewhere
✟29,469.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
What is the message of Surah An-Nahl?

This sura warns against polytheism, saying that the pagan gods cannot create anything, and against comparisons between Allah and any created beings. It also praises Allah for giving the Earth with all its wealth to mankind. According to this sura, all wonders of the natural world, like seas, stars, mountains are proofs of God's infinite power.

It will be good for people to look at some verses in context of the message of the Surah.
Assalamu Alaikum, Islam_Mulia.

I recognize that the context is warning against polytheism, and describing God`s creation and thanking Him for it. 16:66 is in a section of verses (16:65-69), describing the things He created. 16:70 reminds people that God will take us when we die.

Thanks for bringing up the context.

It doesn't change the fact, however, that the Quran has God recorded as saying that milk from cows is "palatable" for those who drink it. This is true in most cases, but not all cases. A person with a milk allergy that s/he in unaware of could get sick or die taking something that God allegedly said is pure and palatable for those who ingest it.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Islam_mulia

Senior Veteran
Jan 17, 2005
4,445
63
✟6,523.00
Faith
Muslim
Assalamu Alaikum, Islam_Mulia.

I recognize that the context is warning against polytheism, and describing God`s creation and thanking Him for it. 16:66 is in a section of verses (16:65-69), describing the things He created. 16:70 reminds people that God will take us when we die.

Thanks for bringing up the context.

It doesn't change the fact, however, that the Quran has God recorded as saying that milk from cows is "palatable" for those who drink it. This is true in most cases, but not all cases. A person with a milk allergy that s/he in unaware of could get sick or die taking something that God allegedly said is pure and palatable for those who ingest it.
Once again, you need to understand the context of the Surah.

The Surah is NOT talking about the benefit of milk, from cattle. It is not telling you that milk gives protein or allergies. The surah is not saying that milk is good or bad for those who drink, that is NOT the lesson that God wants the reader to note. Rather the Surah is telling its readers about the magnanimity of God, about how God enables the cattle to produce milk in between excrement and blood in their bodies. The end product, milk, helps a person to drink without choking, without the residue of excrement and blood.

You are too obsessed about finding faults in the Quran, that you totally looked at the wrong angle and making wrong assumptions. This, after you have given us the commentary of the Quran:


Tafsir Ibn Qathir

(there is for you) - O mankind -
﴿فِى الاٌّنْعَـمِ﴾
(in the cattle) - meaning camels, cows and sheep,
﴿لَعِبْرَةً﴾
(a lesson) meaning a sign and an evidence of the wisdom, power, mercy and kindness of the Creator.
﴿نُّسْقِيكُمْ مِّمَّا فِى بُطُونِهِ﴾
(We have made a drink for you out of what is in its belly) meaning its singular forms refers to one cattle, or it could refer to the whole species. For cattle are the creatures which provide a drink from what is in their bellies and in another Ayah it is `in their bellies.' Either way is plausible. He said,
﴿مِن بَيْنِ فَرْثٍ وَدَمٍ لَّبَنًا خَالِصًا﴾
(from between excretions and blood, pure milk;) meaning it is free of blood, and is pure in its whiteness, taste and sweetness. It is between excrement and blood in the belly of the animal, but each of them goes its own way after the food has been fully digested in its stomach. The blood goes to the veins, the milk goes to the udder, the urine goes to the bladder and the feces goes to the anus. None of them gets mixed with another after separating, and none of them is affected by the other.
﴿لَّبَنًا خَالِصًا سَآئِغًا لِلشَّارِبِينَ﴾
(pure milk; palatable to the drinkers.) meaning nothing to cause one to choke on it. When Allah mentions milk and how He has made it a palatable drink for mankind, He follows this with a reference to the drinks that people make from the fruits of the date palm and grapevine, and what they used to do with intoxicating Nabidh (drink made from dates) before it was forbidden.
Quran Tafsir Ibn Kathir - Lessons and Blessings in Cattle and the Fruit of the Date-palm and Grapevine
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

TG123

Regular Member
Jul 1, 2006
4,965
203
somewhere
✟29,469.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Salaam Alaikum, Islam_Mulia.

Once again, you need to understand the context of the Surah.

The Surah is NOT talking about the benefit of milk, from cattle. It is not telling you that milk gives protein or allergies. The surah is not saying that milk is good or bad for those who drink, that is NOT the lesson that God wants the reader to note. Rather the Surah is telling its readers about the magnanimity of God, about how God enables the cattle to produce milk in between excrement and blood in their bodies.

The Surah is not saying that milk is good for those who drink it? Really?

Then why does the author say it is "palatable" to those who drink it?

16:66

And verily in cattle (too) will ye find an instructive sign. From what is within their bodies between excretions and blood, We produce, for your drink, milk, pure and agreeable to those who drink it.


The end product, milk, helps a person to drink without choking, without the residue of excrement and blood.
Milk does not help a person who has a milk allergy drink without choking, on the contrary, it would cause him or her to choke. It is true that it is without the residue of excrement or blood.

You are too obsessed about finding faults in the Quran, that you totally looked at the wrong angle and making wrong assumptions.

I am just stating what the Quran says. If I am misquoting the Quran or taking it out of context, please show me. If I am wrong, I will admit my error. I have done so in the past on these boards, when Muslims like LoveBeingAMuslimah proved me wrong.

I find it ironic that of all people commenting on Islam on these boards, you seem to think I am the one who is "obsessed" with finding faults in your religion. I spend almost as much time defending it against false and hypocritical accusations as I do debating against it.

I debate with Muslims because I have taken and am taking time to study your religion, unlike other religions that I know little of at the moment.

I have a lot of respect for Muslims, because you also are monotheists, you respect Jesus, and you try to follow God. You make sacrifices for your religion, like fasting and praying daily and giving a portion of your income to the poor. I admire this about Muslims, because these teachings you follow are so similar to the teachings of Jesus. I also share the anger of many Muslims at the brutality and hypocrisy of Western powers and Israel and Russia and China that are murdering and abusing Muslim people.

Because I have respect for you and I love you and I am glad you want to serve God, I want to encourage you to come to Him and find salvation in Him.

Perhaps this is why on Muslim forums, you see Muslims reaching out to Christians and inviting us into your faith. We do have a lot in common.

You believe in God and you believe in His prophets, but the religion you are following portrays an erroneous view of Him.


This, after you have given us the commentary of the Quran:
Tafsir Ibn Qathir

(there is for you) - O mankind -
﴿فِى الاٌّنْعَـمِ﴾
(in the cattle) - meaning camels, cows and sheep,
﴿لَعِبْرَةً﴾
(a lesson) meaning a sign and an evidence of the wisdom, power, mercy and kindness of the Creator.
﴿نُّسْقِيكُمْ مِّمَّا فِى بُطُونِهِ﴾
(We have made a drink for you out of what is in its belly) meaning its singular forms refers to one cattle, or it could refer to the whole species. For cattle are the creatures which provide a drink from what is in their bellies and in another Ayah it is `in their bellies.' Either way is plausible. He said,
﴿مِن بَيْنِ فَرْثٍ وَدَمٍ لَّبَنًا خَالِصًا﴾
(from between excretions and blood, pure milk;) meaning it is free of blood, and is pure in its whiteness, taste and sweetness. It is between excrement and blood in the belly of the animal, but each of them goes its own way after the food has been fully digested in its stomach. The blood goes to the veins, the milk goes to the udder, the urine goes to the bladder and the feces goes to the anus. None of them gets mixed with another after separating, and none of them is affected by the other.
﴿لَّبَنًا خَالِصًا سَآئِغًا لِلشَّارِبِينَ﴾
(pure milk; palatable to the drinkers.) meaning nothing to cause one to choke on it. When Allah mentions milk and how He has made it a palatable drink for mankind, He follows this with a reference to the drinks that people make from the fruits of the date palm and grapevine, and what they used to do with intoxicating Nabidh (drink made from dates) before it was forbidden.
Quran Tafsir Ibn Kathir - Lessons and Blessings in Cattle and the Fruit of the Date-palm and Grapevine

The commentary is saying that the example of cattle producing milk, that is not affected by excrement and blood, that is palatable to the drinkers (meaning there's nothing in it to cause one to choke on it) is a lesson to mankind.

We know that cattle produce milk, and that milk is untainted by blood and excrement. However, we also know that milk does cause some people to choke, and get very sick. It even causes some to die.

The Quran's author was clearly unaware of people with milk allergies.
 
Upvote 0
Jan 25, 2013
3,501
476
✟73,740.00
Faith
Muslim
Marital Status
Private
Show me the verses you are alluding to, and we can discuss them and look at the tafsirs.

I'll respond to this bit.


That was a bad example, actually. I apologize.

Two better examples are these verses:

And have made your sleep as a thing for rest. (An-Naba 78:9)

And have made the day for livelihood. (An-Naba 78:11)


What you're saying is similar to someone saying, "Oh, look, the author of the Qur'aan is saying that sleep is a thing for rest. I guess they didn't know about nightmares. Therefore, that means the religion is wrong."

Or, "Hey, the author of the Qur'aan didn't know that some people earn wages at night. That must mean that the Qur'aan cannot be from God because He knows everything."


It's just understood to be general. It's such an obvious point that no one ever thinks to explain it further.
 
Upvote 0

TG123

Regular Member
Jul 1, 2006
4,965
203
somewhere
✟29,469.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Assalamu Alaikum.

I'll respond to this bit.
Either you respond to everything I say, or you don't get to respond at all.

No, don't worry, I'm just being an idiot. I'll gladly respond to your reply. :)

That was a bad example, actually. I apologize.
It's OK, we all make mistakes. Only God is perfect.
Two better examples are these verses:

And have made your sleep as a thing for rest. (An-Naba 78:9)

And have made the day for livelihood. (An-Naba 78:11)


What you're saying is similar to someone saying, "Oh, look, the author of the Qur'aan is saying that sleep is a thing for rest. I guess they didn't know about nightmares. Therefore, that means the religion is wrong."

Or, "Hey, the author of the Qur'aan didn't know that some people earn wages at night. That must mean that the Qur'aan cannot be from God because He knows everything."

It's just understood to be general. It's such an obvious point that no one ever thinks to explain it further.
78:9 is true, even for people who suffer from nightmares and other sleep disorders. When the body is asleep, it does get rest. The sleep may be interrupted by problems like nightmares and it affects the body, but the body still does rest, even if briefly.

Tafsir Al Jalalayn on this verse states:

and made your sleep for rest?, repose for your bodies,

Altafsir.com - The Tafsirs - ÇáÊÝÇÓíÑ

78:11 states that God made the day as a time for seeking livelihood. It isn't an error, it states that God made the day to be a time for people to work. It doesn't state that people only work during the day, or even that people work during the day. It just states that God made the day as a time for people to work.

16:66, in contrast, states that milk from cattle is palatable for those who drink it. Unlike 78:9, which is a statement that is true for everyone, 16:66 definitely isn't.

It is true for some people, even most... but completely false in the case of others. A person who has a milk allergy who takes a sip of milk will not find it palatable, but will in most likelihood be choking and/or throwing up immediately after consuming it. Anaphylaxis may also occur, which can lead to death.

Milk allergy: Symptoms - MayoClinic.com




 
Upvote 0

Islam_mulia

Senior Veteran
Jan 17, 2005
4,445
63
✟6,523.00
Faith
Muslim
Salaam Alaikum, Islam_Mulia.


The Surah is not saying that milk is good for those who drink it? Really?

Then why does the author say it is "palatable" to those who drink it?
[/color]
16:66

And verily in cattle (too) will ye find an instructive sign. From what is within their bodies between excretions and blood, We produce, for your drink, milk, pure and agreeable to those who drink it.

The main focus of the verse is to tell the readers that Allah is able to produce milk, in between excrement and blood of the cattle, so that humans can drink the milk without choking, without any trace of blood or waste products of the cattle. The concern was not on the milk, per se, but on the production of milk.

Similarly at verse 67,

And from the fruit of the date-palm and the vine, ye get out wholesome drink and food: behold, in this also is a sign for those who are wise.

http://quran.com/16/63-69

The focus is on the production of wholesome drink from date palm, not about the content of the drink.

I have explained that the above verses should be read in context of the Surah regarding the bountiness and miracles of God.

I think this is a good opportunity for me to invite all readers, Muslims and non-Muslims to read the Surah, without prejudice and understand the wonderful message for those who think.


Milk does not help a person who has a milk allergy drink without choking, on the contrary, it would cause him or her to choke.
Straw man argument - the verse was on the miraculous production of milk, not about a person allergic to milk drinking milk.

The commentary is saying that the example of cattle producing milk, that is not affected by excrement and blood, that is palatable to the drinkers (meaning there's nothing in it to cause one to choke on it) is a lesson to mankind.

We know that cattle produce milk, and that milk is untainted by blood and excrement. However, we also know that milk does cause some people to choke, and get very sick. It even causes some to die.

The Quran's author was clearly unaware of people with milk allergies.
Oh my:confused: First you talk about Quran's error about milk not for those with allergies. Now, you trying to start another about milk causing people to choke.

Seriously, did you not read what I wrote? The verse 16:66 was talking about the miraculous production of milk, from cattle, without blood or excrement. It is because of the absence of these materials in milk that you can easily drink the liquid.

I think I have made my points clear. Again, I invite all to read Surah An-Nahl and reflect on the context and the message.
 
Upvote 0

TG123

Regular Member
Jul 1, 2006
4,965
203
somewhere
✟29,469.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Salaam Alaikum, Islam_Mulia.

The main focus of the verse is to tell the readers that Allah is able to produce milk, in between excrement and blood of the cattle, so that humans can drink the milk without choking, without any trace of blood or waste products of the cattle. The concern was not on the milk, per se, but on the production of milk.
Sure, the verse talks about the production of milk. It also states that the milk that is produced is palatable to those who drink it. This is not true for all people. For many, it is very unpalatable.

Similarly at verse 67,

And from the fruit of the date-palm and the vine, ye get out wholesome drink and food: behold, in this also is a sign for those who are wise.

http://quran.com/16/63-69

The focus is on the production of wholesome drink from date palm, not about the content of the drink.
The verse may or may not focus on the content of the drink, but it states that out of the date palm and vine, one gets wholesome drink and food.

Likewise, regardless of whether or not 16:66 focuses on the palatability of milk, it does state it is palatable. It isn't for many people.

I have explained that the above verses should be read in context of the Surah regarding the bountiness and miracles of God.
And I have explained that I understand that. However, it is still not a true statement that milk is palatable for those who drink it. For most it is. For some it isn't.
I think this is a good opportunity for me to invite all readers, Muslims and non-Muslims to read the Surah, without prejudice and understand the wonderful message for those who think.
[/color][/color]
Please do so. Also keep in mind that a writer who states that milk is palatable for those who drink it, is either unaware of people with milk allergies or doesn't consider them people.

Think of what would happen if a doctor began telling the general public that aspirin is good for those who swallow it.
Straw man argument - the verse was on the miraculous production of milk, not about a person allergic to milk drinking milk.
The verse on the miraculous production of milk also mentioned that for those who drink it, milk is palatable. That is false in the case of people with milk allergies.
Oh my:confused: First you talk about Quran's error about milk not for those with allergies. Now, you trying to start another about milk causing people to choke.
Having an allergy to milk often causes people with the allergy to choke on it. Google "milk allergies symptoms" and see what comes up.

Seriously, did you not read what I wrote? The verse 16:66 was talking about the miraculous production of milk, from cattle, without blood or excrement. It is because of the absence of these materials in milk that you can easily drink the liquid.
Seriously, I did.

16:66 does not say that because of the absence of blood and excrement, one can drink milk. It says that milk is palatable for those who drink it. I understand wanting to change what the Quran says, but the verse is clear. So are the tafsirs. They state that milk is palatable for those who drink it.

I think I have made my points clear. Again, I invite all to read Surah An-Nahl and reflect on the context and the message.
Please do so. Reflect on the content, too.
 
Upvote 0

Islam_mulia

Senior Veteran
Jan 17, 2005
4,445
63
✟6,523.00
Faith
Muslim
Salaam Alaikum, Islam_Mulia.


Sure, the verse talks about the production of milk. It also states that the milk that is produced is palatable to those who drink it. This is not true for all people. For many, it is very unpalatable.
It is palatable in the context that one can drink and easily swallow milk without blood and excrement in it. Note the context is on production of milk, not that milk is sweet or juicy and hence palatable to some people, the latter your interpretation.

The verse may or may not focus on the content of the drink, but it states that out of the date palm and vine, one gets wholesome drink and food.
Yes, I see some hope in you. The verse talks about production of drink from date palm, not if the drink is palatable to some. The similarity to verse 66 is so clear.

Likewise, regardless of whether or not 16:66 focuses on the palatability of milk, it does state it is palatable. It isn't for many people.
Palatable in the context that you can swallow it, not that you can choke because of blood or excrement in it.

Strange, you quoted Ibn Kathir and not agreeing to his comments. :yum:


And I have explained that I understand that. However, it is still not a true statement that milk is palatable for those who drink it. For most it is. For some it isn't.
It is not what the verse was trying to tell the readers. The Quranic verse was talking about getting milk from the bellies of the cattle, it does not even attempt to explain how milk is good or not good to people.

Think of what would happen if a doctor began telling the general public that aspirin is good for those who swallow it.
Oh if we are talking about the context of the Quranic verse, then you should talk about how miraculous aspirin was produced from something. Not whether aspirin is good for you or not. See the similarity?

The verse on the miraculous production of milk also mentioned that for those who drink it, milk is palatable. That is false in the case of people with milk allergies.
See above.

Having an allergy to milk often causes people with the allergy to choke on it. Google "milk allergies symptoms" and see what comes up.
I dont deny that some people are allergic to milk. However, the Quranic verse was not talking about this. You are shooting at the wrong target.

16:66 does not say that because of the absence of blood and excrement, one can drink milk. It says that milk is palatable for those who drink it. I understand wanting to change what the Quran says, but the verse is clear. So are the tafsirs. They state that milk is palatable for those who drink it.


Please do so. Reflect on the content, too.
Read the Quranic verse in context and read the commentary by Ibn Kathir and what I wrote above.
 
Upvote 0

TG123

Regular Member
Jul 1, 2006
4,965
203
somewhere
✟29,469.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Salaam Alaikum.
It is palatable in the context that one can drink and easily swallow milk without blood and excrement in it. Note the context is on production of milk, not that milk is sweet or juicy and hence palatable to some people, the latter your interpretation.
The verse describes both milk production, and the palatability of milk. Nowhere is it said that milk is palatable because it is not mixed with blood and excrement... and even if that was the context of the verse, it would still be wrong... because for many people, milk is not palatable.

Yes, I see some hope in you. The verse talks about production of drink from date palm, not if the drink is palatable to some. The similarity to verse 66 is so clear.
Only palatability is not mentioned, as was with milk.

Palatable in the context that you can swallow it, not that you can choke because of blood or excrement in it.
The verse does not state that milk is palatable because there isn't excrement or blood in it, it just states it is palatable to the drinkers after it states it doesn't mix with the excrement and blood of the cattle. Even if the focus was on milk production, the verse would still be wrong because milk is not palatable for those who drink it... for most it is, for some it isn't.
Strange, you quoted Ibn Kathir and not agreeing to his comments. :yum:
Ibn Kathir did not connect the palatability of milk with how it is made.

Tafsir Ibn Qathir

(there is for you) - O mankind -
﴿فِى الاٌّنْعَـمِ﴾
(in the cattle) - meaning camels, cows and sheep,
﴿لَعِبْرَةً﴾
(a lesson) meaning a sign and an evidence of the wisdom, power, mercy and kindness of the Creator.
﴿نُّسْقِيكُمْ مِّمَّا فِى بُطُونِهِ﴾
(We have made a drink for you out of what is in its belly) meaning its singular forms refers to one cattle, or it could refer to the whole species. For cattle are the creatures which provide a drink from what is in their bellies and in another Ayah it is `in their bellies.' Either way is plausible. He said,
﴿مِن بَيْنِ فَرْثٍ وَدَمٍ لَّبَنًا خَالِصًا﴾
(from between excretions and blood, pure milk;) meaning it is free of blood, and is pure in its whiteness, taste and sweetness. It is between excrement and blood in the belly of the animal, but each of them goes its own way after the food has been fully digested in its stomach. The blood goes to the veins, the milk goes to the udder, the urine goes to the bladder and the feces goes to the anus. None of them gets mixed with another after separating, and none of them is affected by the other.
﴿لَّبَنًا خَالِصًا سَآئِغًا لِلشَّارِبِينَ﴾
(pure milk; palatable to the drinkers.) meaning nothing to cause one to choke on it.When Allah mentions milk and how He has made it a palatable drink for mankind, He follows this with a reference to the drinks that people make from the fruits of the date palm and grapevine, and what they used to do with intoxicating Nabidh (drink made from dates) before it was forbidden.
Quran Tafsir Ibn Kathir - Lessons and Blessings in Cattle and the Fruit of the Date-palm and Grapevine

Nothing in this tafsir that says milk is palatable because of how it is made. These are 2 separate topics.
.
It is not what the verse was trying to tell the readers. The Quranic verse was talking about getting milk from the bellies of the cattle, it does not even attempt to explain how milk is good or not good to people.
Of course it attempts to explain how good milk is... it states it is palatable to those who drink it.
.
Oh if we are talking about the context of the Quranic verse, then you should talk about how miraculous aspirin was produced from something. Not whether aspirin is good for you or not. See the similarity?
If a doctor describes how miraculously aspirin is produced and then states that those who ingest it will find it good for them, he would be likely sued for malpractice.

.
I dont deny that some people are allergic to milk.

Great. I see some hope in you too.

.
However, the Quranic verse was not talking about this.
No, it told the readers how milk is produced, and then said that milk is palatable for those who drink it. The author was ignorant of milk allergies, or chose to ignore these people.
.
You are shooting at the wrong target.
I bet Dick Cheney would have wished he heard these words before he almost blew his buddy away in the hunting accident.

Thanks for your advice, but I know what I am saying.


.
Read the Quranic verse in context and read the commentary by Ibn Kathir and what I wrote above.
I have. My conclusions have not changed. I would hope that anyone who reads the verse and tafsirs will see that the verse is describing how milk is produced, and then states that milk is palatable to those who drink it, because that is what it says.
 
Upvote 0