Search results

Well, would it have helped? Were we close to breaking them and changing their minds? I'd like to think I'm a bit of a pragmatist here.

Those were just the first ones that came to mind. I've seen such complaints from just about every mainstream news source. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/04/us/politics/hillary-clinton-fundraising.html...

...No, they haven't. In fact, it's been a near-constant refrain, even in the hard-left rags I read. Washington Post criticized her for it. So did Slate. Here's NBC News. Shall I continue?

Let's game this out for a second. What do you think would happen if the USA just opened fire on those boats?

I cannot help but respect the heck out of that. :)

I don't remember the last time a post made me laugh this hard. :D

Oh boy, the first time you try to pull this stuff in front of court you are in for a treat, let me tell you. :D

I reiterate my question: have you ever heard of a "benchslap"?

It's good to know that I'm not along here. :)

Citation needed. No, seriously, this claim is just bizarre. Our military is the strongest in the world. What are you even talking about?

Does the term "benchslap" mean anything to you? :D

(posting drunk) If this was all there was to the oathkeepers, I wouldn't have a problem with them. Neither would the SPLC. But unfortunately, that's not all that there is to them.

(Posting drunk) http://www.plannedparenthoodaction.org/blog/how-do-hillary-clinton-and-bernie-sanders-compare-womens-health It's a pretty long list, actually. I couldn't name a politician who's done more for women than Clinton. I could believe it if there was one, but she's definitely pretty...

https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2013/07/25/oath-keepers-rally-reveals-radical-politics-group These nutters?

You wondering why we relaxed sanctions on Iran. That's a question with two very clear answers: In exchange, we were able to prevent them from further developing nukes The rest of the international community was no longer on board with the sanctions, so it would not have been very effective...

Why are you starting a thread on a topic you don't know the basics about?

You know, I'm reminded of an old bit by Roy Zimmerman: "The Bush administration is just a vast, well orchestrated conspiracy to make Nixon look rational. And it's working! Nixon looks rational, Reagan looks fiscally responsible... Dan Quayle looks like a genius..." Man, remember when that...

So what do you call the AP's recent expose on the Clinton Foundation?

So? She's taking their money, not giving them money, and there's no evidence that this has affected her policy on women in any way at all.

America has the strongest military in the world and has not been hesitant to use it. With that in mind: Do you honestly believe Iran would do that? Do you really think Iran would pick a fight with the US? Do you think they'd honestly be that stupid as to willingly open themselves up to...