Search results

  1. Late_Cretaceous

    Avian traits evolved earlier than previously thought

    Tsk Tsk Evolutionists keep changing and revising and updating their story. It's worse then trying to keep up with technology. First you get a beta, then a VCR, then a CD player, then a DVD, then a blueray. Too much change and development for some people. Isn't it better to just have one story...
  2. Late_Cretaceous

    Penn & Teller tell it like it is on Creationism!

    A Shiba Inu actually. Can't trust them off leash. Well you can - you can trust them to suddenly forget that they are supposedly domesicated animals and think that they are a fox who needs to get as far from humans as possible. Until he gets hungry.
  3. Late_Cretaceous

    Penn & Teller tell it like it is on Creationism!

    http://www.wimp.com/takecreationsim/ It's funny and true. You gotta love the part where one guy wants to put science to popular vote.
  4. Late_Cretaceous

    Embedded age vs astronomy

    The whole embedded age idea would mean that the universe is one great deception created to fool all of us. It would mean that the light we see from the Milky Way at night was never actually emitted by the stars. It would mean that the supernova we see in a distant galaxy never actually...
  5. Late_Cretaceous

    Dangers of Overselling Darwin

    I looked that one up. As a person, with an education in the biological sciences who appreciates and fully supports evolutionary theory (in other words, I am an evolutionist), I fully agree with that statement. "We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection...
  6. Late_Cretaceous

    Dangers of Overselling Darwin

    It was a joke Hespera. I have been learning all about it in some courses I have been taking lately.
  7. Late_Cretaceous

    Dangers of Overselling Darwin

    Do you mean a suit made out of asbestos in court? A fireproof suit?
  8. Late_Cretaceous

    Dangers of Overselling Darwin

    His entire premise seems to rest on the misconception that Evolutionary Theory rests entirely upon the fossil record. Nothing could be farther from the truth. The strongest evidence for evolution, including insights into lineages and the mechanisms for evolution, by far comes from DNA. This...
  9. Late_Cretaceous

    Entropy disproves Darwin

    I wonder if he realizes that the creationist organization called answers in geneis (answersingenesis.com) actually councils creationists NOT to use this argument in their "arguments creationists should not use page". How sad is that.
  10. Late_Cretaceous

    Entropy disproves Darwin

    Still waiting for those creationists to discover the sun
  11. Late_Cretaceous

    Entropy disproves Darwin

    Here is a quote from a creationist that is right on the money That's right folks. According to creationists, evolution can only happen if the Earth has an outside source of energy. You heard it right from their mouths. Fortunately, scientists have discovered just such a source of energy...
  12. Late_Cretaceous

    The evolution creation debate can be murder.

    I just gotta say wow. Somebody took having his Bronze Age worldview being threatened way too seriously, according to this article in the Brisbane Times.
  13. Late_Cretaceous

    A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism

    Lets do a survey for biological scientists that says " I think evolutionary theory is pure bullcrap" and see how many sign it.
  14. Late_Cretaceous

    A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism

    Here is a copy of the statement that 700 scientists have supposedly signed ... "We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged,&quot...
  15. Late_Cretaceous

    I am a Scientist...

    I thought Jesus said something about believing in him like a child. He didn't say anything about having a PhD in theology. Not that this has anything to do with evolution however.
  16. Late_Cretaceous

    the universe, at least to me, could not have formed by blind chance and coincidence..

    Newsflash: Evolutionists do not believe the universe came into being by blind chance nor coincidence. That goes for both atheists and theists.
  17. Late_Cretaceous

    No Physical Difference Between the Geocentric Model and the Modern Heliocentric View

    If Richard accepts the idea that a heliocentric universe and a geocentric universe are not contradictory does he also accept that freedom is slavery? Or maybe, a literal interpretation of Genesis does not contradict a non-literal interpretation.
  18. Late_Cretaceous

    If Adam and Eve are literal, why do all embyos start out as female?

    It makes sense that a story carries more meaning when it is taken symbolically rather then literally.