• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Texas City May Run Out of Water People Vs Corporations

DaisyDay

I Did Nothing Wrong!! ~~Team Deep State
Jan 7, 2003
44,632
21,680
Finger Lakes
✟384,582.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

The city is Corpus Christi, and difficulties with water scarcity are now coming to a head after years of concerns over shortages.

There are multiple issues combining here, perhaps most importantly the arrival of major industrial developments, off the back of the unlocking of vast oil and gas reserves that came with the shale revolution.

One plastics chemical complex, built in 2022, uses as much water for cooling every day as all the Corpus Christi residents combined.

...And then there's climate change: Texas has been hit by a series of historical droughts in recent years. It all adds up to a scarcity of water that life and businesses rely on.

...Emergency measures might include rolling 'water blackouts', where water is only available for some parts of the day, for example. However, that's not really a solution for industrial uses – these refineries and plants would have to be shut down, bringing subsequent knock-on effects on the economy and communities.

"Corpus Christi has come as close to running out of water as practically any city in the United States," says Dylan Baddour, a journalist at Inside Climate News.
But corporations are people, according to the Supreme Court.
 

JSRG

Well-Known Member
Apr 14, 2019
2,705
1,725
Midwest
✟272,968.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
But corporations are people, according to the Supreme Court.
What in the world this remark has to do with the story, I am unsure--the word "corporation" is not even used in the article. But the Supreme Court never ruled that "corporations are people." What they have ruled is that corporations get things like freedom of speech rights (note the First Amendment says "Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press" and not ""Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press of people"). Would you prefer that the government be allowed to restrict speech of corporations--that they could criminally charge websites and newspapers for publishing speech they don't like, so long as there is a corporation that runs the newspaper/website?
 
Upvote 0

Fantine

Dona Quixote
Site Supporter
Jun 11, 2005
42,494
17,348
Fort Smith
✟1,577,428.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Daisy is saying that speech and "money" are two different things. Large corporations have so much money to throw at candidates that no candidates who are unwilling to play ball with them are able to compete. The Citizens United decision is completely wrong, but when we get honest legislators hopefully we can pass a law to prohibit it.
 
Upvote 0

JSRG

Well-Known Member
Apr 14, 2019
2,705
1,725
Midwest
✟272,968.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Daisy is saying that speech and "money" are two different things. Large corporations have so much money to throw at candidates that no candidates who are unwilling to play ball with them are able to compete. The Citizens United decision is completely wrong, but when we get honest legislators hopefully we can pass a law to prohibit it.
Except neither the article nor the post draws any connection whatsoever between political candidates (let alone the question of corporations and them) and the situation in question. I don't see what they have to do with each other.
 
Upvote 0

Fantine

Dona Quixote
Site Supporter
Jun 11, 2005
42,494
17,348
Fort Smith
✟1,577,428.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
When I heard that a desalination plant in southern Iran was hit, depriving 10,000 people of life-sustaining water, I was angry, shocked, and ashamed of the U.S. I began to wonder if we had any desalination plants providing potable water to citizens. We have 400! Some of them are relatively small, but others are depended upon by thousands. Unsurprisingly, Arizona and California have some.

When countries deprive thousands of innocent civilians life-sustaining water due to bombing these plants, it's not war anymore. it's genocide. That shouldn't be hard for anyone to agree with.
 
Upvote 0

Pommer

Future History Slab Carver
Sep 13, 2008
25,697
15,600
Earth
✟312,064.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
What in the world this remark has to do with the story, I am unsure--the word "corporation" is not even used in the article. But the Supreme Court never ruled that "corporations are people." What they have ruled is that corporations get things like freedom of speech rights (note the First Amendment says "Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press" and not ""Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press of people"). Would you prefer that the government be allowed to restrict speech of corporations--that they could criminally charge websites and newspapers for publishing speech they don't like, so long as there is a corporation that runs the newspaper/website?
There is no difference between a person and a corporation before the law.
If a corporation needs 100,000 balloons of water per day and pays for it, then they should get it.
If this leads to water shortages, how is it the “fault” of the corporation?
 
Upvote 0