Decency would suggest you don't get to keep attacking the neighbors of the people you're mad at (and taking over their land) just because the people you're at odds with have still failed to surrender.
If you attacked me, and I retaliated by attacking not only your property, but the property of your neighbors, after it'd already been known that I had preexisting greater ambitions of a "Greater Neighborhood" project where I already had my eyes set on taking over your neighbor's property even before your attack, it'd raise some eyebrows would it not?
The "Greater Israel" concept, which envisions a state extending from the Nile to the Euphrates was already in existence before the attacks. Which means "give me an excuse to do the thing I wanted to do anyway".
And their behaviors have proved that out.
There's a pattern of "setting up a security buffer" (IE: occupying the land of another entity), and then after they decide to push the line a little further for the "buffer", people start relocating to and inhabiting the previous "buffer zone".
The settlement expansion isn't just a figment of everyone's imagination.
Have you seen the footage of how the settlers behave?, they're obnoxious degenerates and it would make any reasonable person's blood boil with revenge fantasies of "what I'd do if someone tried to take my house like that" if it happened here.
If anyone tried to take over my property the way some of those settlers take over the property of the Palestinians (which often involves beating up elderly, women, and children...sometimes to death)...while the "authorities" stand by and watch and do nothing (or sometimes join in), I'd be letting the lead fly.
The irony is, most of the offenders practice Hasidic Judaism, which has as about as much to do with original Judaism as a ham & cheese sandwich. (the Jews of biblical times would look at modern Hasidic and Rabbinic Judaism, and not even recognize it, which makes sense given that it was invented in the late 1700's in Ukraine)
