• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Jesus = Michael?

Hentenza

I will fear no evil for You are with me
Site Supporter
Mar 27, 2007
40,498
7,456
On the bus to Heaven
✟343,392.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
This is just your opinion, the Archangel is a Title, its not a created angel. An angel just means messenger. Jesus is the Bread of Life doesn;t mean he is created bread, He is the Rock, doesn't mean He is a created rock, He is the Vine, doesn't mean He is a created vine. These are arguments already been addressed at length, you are not following it, so no point in trying to reason with you. I am OK agreeing to disagree.
Nothing in scripture or the deity of Jesus that supports your theory.
 
Upvote 0

Hentenza

I will fear no evil for You are with me
Site Supporter
Mar 27, 2007
40,498
7,456
On the bus to Heaven
✟343,392.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
@SabbathBlessings

“But Michael the archangel, when he disputed with the devil and argued about the body of Moses, did not dare pronounce against him an abusive judgment, but said, “The Lord rebuke you!””
‭‭Jude‬ ‭1‬:‭9‬ ‭NASB2020‬‬

Why would Jesus say the lord rebukes you when He IS the Lord. That really kills your theory.
 

SabbathBlessings

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2020
16,103
6,106
USA
✟864,030.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Why would Jesus say the lord rebukes you when He IS the Lord. That really kills your theory.
Not at all...

Zechariah 3:2 The LORD said to Satan, 'The LORD rebuke you, Satan! Indeed, the LORD who has chosen Jerusalem rebuke you!'"
 
Upvote 0

Hentenza

I will fear no evil for You are with me
Site Supporter
Mar 27, 2007
40,498
7,456
On the bus to Heaven
✟343,392.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Not at all...

Zechariah 3:2 The LORD said to Satan, 'The LORD rebuke you, Satan! Indeed, the LORD who has chosen Jerusalem rebuke you!'"
Different context and different verse. Jude 1:9 is not quoting Zach. 3:2. This does not help you.
 

SabbathBlessings

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2020
16,103
6,106
USA
✟864,030.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Different context and different verse. Jude 1:9 is not quoting Zach. 3:2. This does not help you.
That’s not what you said….you said

Why would Jesus say the lord rebukes you when He IS the Lord.
Meaning why would God use Himself in third person.

Yet we find the LORD doing exactly this, saying the EXACT thing, to the EXACT devil.

Zechariah 3:2 The LORD said to Satan, 'The LORD rebuke you, Satan! Indeed, the LORD who has chosen Jerusalem rebuke you!'"

You changed the goal post, but it’s what I figured. Like I said, we are too far apart on even basic things to reason, so I am going to move on. Take care.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Hentenza

I will fear no evil for You are with me
Site Supporter
Mar 27, 2007
40,498
7,456
On the bus to Heaven
✟343,392.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
That’s not what you said….you said


Yet we find the LORD doing exactly this, saying the exact thing, to the same devil.

Zechariah 3:2 The LORD said to Satan, 'The LORD rebuke you, Satan! Indeed, the LORD who has chosen Jerusalem rebuke you!'"

You changed the goal post, but it’s what I figured you would do. Like I said, we are too far apart on even basic things to reason, so I am going to move on. Take care.
Again, different context, different verse. Jude 1:9 is not quoting Zach. 3:2. You can’t just quote verses out of a hat.
 

prodromos

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Nov 28, 2003
25,383
17,035
60
Sydney, Straya
✟1,645,917.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
There is only one Archangel

Jude 1:9 Yet Michael the archangel, in contending with the devil, when he disputed about the body of Moses, dared not bring against him a reviling accusation, but said, “The Lord rebuke you!”
That is your interpretation. It is not the only possible interpretation.
1 Thess 4:16 implies plural archangels.

Scripture speaks of Zibeon the Hivite, Elon the Hittite and many others in the same manner.
 
Last edited:

David Lamb

Well-Known Member
May 30, 2024
5,202
3,503
77
Paignton
✟154,729.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
There is only one Archangel

Jude 1:9 Yet Michael the archangel, in contending with the devil, when he disputed about the body of Moses, dared not bring against him a reviling accusation, but said, “The Lord rebuke you!”
The fact that Jude calls Michael "the archangel" rather than "an archangel" doesn't mean that there is only one archangel. How many Pharisees were there? Far more than one. Yet we often read of individual Pharisees being referred to as "the Pharisee", for example:

(Luk 11:38) When the Pharisee saw it, he marveled that He had not first washed before dinner.
 

JulieB67

Well-Known Member
Apr 21, 2020
2,411
1,058
58
Ohio US
✟249,982.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
If Jesus is called a Prince why would He not be the Chief Prince
Because we are given the information that Michael is an angel. A high one, yes, but still an angel. So once we have that information there should be no debate. And I've already stated the difference many times between being called Prince and being called "one of the chief princes"

And you keep applying added reverence with posting uppercase Archangel and Chief Prince when in the Bible it's archangel and "one of the chief princes" Neither of those descriptions would apply to Christ.

You can't name more than one Archangel because there is only one, otherwise you could simply provide the Scripture.

Logic alone tells us there is more than one. When we find out that Michael is an angel than we know that from Daniel that he is "one of the chief princes" And you can keep posting Archangel but it's not going to change that fact that it's archangel. You have given him the title. The Bible certainly doesn't.
 
Last edited:

SabbathBlessings

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2020
16,103
6,106
USA
✟864,030.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
The fact that Jude calls Michael "the archangel" rather than "an archangel" doesn't mean that there is only one archangel. How many Pharisees were there? Far more than one. Yet we often read of individual Pharisees being referred to as "the Pharisee", for example:

(Luk 11:38) When the Pharisee saw it, he marveled that He had not first washed before dinner.
I can name other Pharisees, in the instance it speaking of a specific one.

Name another Archangel other than Michael.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

SabbathBlessings

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2020
16,103
6,106
USA
✟864,030.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Because we are given the information that Michael is an angel. A high one, yes, but still an angel. So once we have that information there should be no debate. And I've already stated the difference many times between being called Prince and being called "one of the chief princes"

And you keep applying added reverence with posting uppercase Archangel and Chief Prince when in the Bible it's archangel and "one of the chief princes" Neither of those descriptions would apply to Christ.



Logic alone tells us there is more than one. When we find out that Michael is an angel than we know that from Daniel that he is "one of the chief princes" And you can keep posting Archangel but it's not going to change that fact that it's archangel. You have given him the title. The Bible certainly doesn't.
He is never referred to as an angel, only the Archangel, which is a Title. You also keep thinking that punctuations are added in the original Text when its not, its added by translators who refers God as him, lower case, often, which doesn’t take away God’s Divinity.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

David Lamb

Well-Known Member
May 30, 2024
5,202
3,503
77
Paignton
✟154,729.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
I can name other Pharisees, name another Archangel.
The fact that I cannot name them doesn't mean that they do not exist. It is at least implied that there are other archangels besides Michael, in this verse:

(1Th 4:16) For the Lord Himself will descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of an archangel, and with the trumpet of God. And the dead in Christ will rise first.
 

SabbathBlessings

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2020
16,103
6,106
USA
✟864,030.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
The fact that I cannot name them doesn't mean that they do not exist.
It doesn’t mean they do either, Scripture tells us to go by what is stated in Scripture Psa 119:105, not what isn’t or could be
It is at least implied that there are other archangels besides Michael, in this verse:

(1Th 4:16) For the Lord Himself will descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of an archangel, and with the trumpet of God. And the dead in Christ will rise first.
Yes, the voice of the Archangel raises the dead - we are told plainly only Christ voice raises the dead. I think this verse has been discussed many times on this thread, I am not sure if you have read the responses in this thread about this same verse.
 
Upvote 0

David Lamb

Well-Known Member
May 30, 2024
5,202
3,503
77
Paignton
✟154,729.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
It doesn’t mean they do either, Scripture tells us to go by what is stated in Scripture Psa 119:105, not what isn’t or could be

Yes, the voice of the Archangel raises the dead - we are told plainly only Christ voice raises the dead. I think this verse has been discussed many times on this thread, I am not sure if you have read the responses in this thread about this same verse.
Where does the verse say that the voice of an archangel raises the dead? Here is that verse again:

(1Th 4:16) For the Lord Himself will descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of an archangel, and with the trumpet of God. And the dead in Christ will rise first.

It says that the descending of Christ will be accompanied by a shout, the voice of an archangel. Then it says that the dead in Christ will rise first, not that the voice of an archangel will raise them.
 
Upvote 0

SabbathBlessings

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2020
16,103
6,106
USA
✟864,030.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Where does the verse say that the voice of an archangel raises the dead? Here is that verse again:

(1Th 4:16) For the Lord Himself will descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of an archangel, and with the trumpet of God. And the dead in Christ will rise first.

It says that the descending of Christ will be accompanied by a shout, the voice of an archangel. Then it says that the dead in Christ will rise first, not that the voice of an archangel will raise them.
Yes, this has been addressed.

The verse does not say an archangel gives a separate command. The subject is "the Lord Himself." Paul says Christ descends "with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trumpet of God." These are descriptions of the majesty and authority accompanying Christ's return.

We know Christ's voice raises the dead. Jesus said, "the hour is coming in which all who are in the graves will hear His voice and come forth" (John 5:28-29). At the Second Coming, the dead are raised (1 Thess. 4:16), so whose voice is calling them? Jesus' voice.

If the dead are raised by Christ's voice, and 1 Thessalonians 4:16 connects the resurrection with "the voice of the archangel" its only logical its one of the same. Why we see similar verses like Zec 3:2 Jude1:9

Why would God the Creator need to use a voice of an angel to raise the dead? We are told its His voice that does. We believe this is just another Title Jesus goes by as He goes by many, not that He is an angel or created being- I know what many are trying to make it seem like its what we believe, when we stated repeatedly its not . Its okay we if we do not agree. I think this thread has run its course, it seems to be the same arguments repeated. I will probably move on, but wish everyone well.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

SabbathBlessings

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2020
16,103
6,106
USA
✟864,030.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
The word speaks for itself. And is derived from two words, the latter meaning angel.
So no Scripture, just your own reasoning. And I guess from this reasoning the Angel of the Lord in your view is a created angel.

Thanks for sharing.
 
Upvote 0

JulieB67

Well-Known Member
Apr 21, 2020
2,411
1,058
58
Ohio US
✟249,982.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
So no Scripture,
We have the Greek meaning. So we don't need a scripture to tell us that archangel is indeed an angel. Do you have scripture that it's Michael's voice that raises the dead? No. That is your own reasoning.

Just as you have no scripture that states Michael is Jesus Christ or vice versa.

I at least have scripture that points to Michael being "one of the chief princes" Meaning there is more than one. And I have the Greek meaning that archangel explicitly states that is an angel.

I guess it's another thing we'll find out....
 
Upvote 0