ViaCrucis
Confessional Lutheran
- Oct 2, 2011
- 40,434
- 30,193
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Lutheran
- Marital Status
- In Relationship
- Politics
- US-Others
No. It did not.
Then either you didn't read it, or you haven't been paying attention to what I've been saying.
Let's break it down.
Yes, within the Christian faith, Jesus was fully human and biologically male.[1]
I have repeatedly said in this thread that God the Son (Jesus) became man, and in becoming man, is male.
According to Christian theology:
- God the Father and the Holy Spirit are spirit, meaning God does not have a physical body or a biological sex.
There it is, right there. God, in His Divine Essence, does not have a physical body or a biological sex. God does not, in His Divine Essence, have gender.
God the Father (who never became Incarnate) is not a male.
God the Holy Spirit (who never became Incarnate) is not a male.
God the Son, WHO BECAME INCARNATE, is male, because He's human.
If you are exploring the theological or historical reasons behind this, I can:
according to traditional Christian theology, Jesus will always be male. In the Incarnation, the Son of God took on human nature permanently. His resurrected, glorified body retains His historical, physical characteristics, including His male identity. [1, 2, 3, 4]
- Detail the historical and cultural significance of Jesus being a man in first-century Judea.
- Discuss what early Christian scholars wrote about gender and the Divine.
- Explain how both men and women are viewed as being made in the image of God. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
The belief that Jesus' male identity is eternal is rooted in several foundational teachings: [1]
Because Jesus retains His perfected humanity, His male gender is considered an eternal aspect of His glorified human nature. [1, 2, 3]
- The Eternal God-Man: Christian theology teaches that Jesus did not just "borrow" a human body temporarily; He is forever the God-man. Centuries after His ascension, the Apostle Paul referred to Him in 1 Timothy 2:5 as "the man Christ Jesus". [1, 2, 3]
- The Resurrection Pattern: Following His resurrection, Jesus retained His physical form, ate with His disciples, and allowed them to touch His crucifixion wounds. He was fully recognizable to others as a man. [1, 2, 3, 4]
- Glorified Humanity: Glorification does not mean the erasure of physical traits. Instead, it means the body is perfected, imperishable, and free from decay, weakness, and the effects of sin. [1, 2]
All of this re-affirms that Jesus, in His humanity, is male.
So where, exactly, does any of this disagree with what I've said in this thread?
Upvote
0