- Feb 5, 2002
- 190,137
- 70,357
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
Upvote
0
-
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
-
CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
Talarico recants past statements, says he was 'intentionally provocative' by calling God 'non-binary'
- Thread starter Michie
- Start date
- Feb 5, 2002
- 190,137
- 70,357
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
God identifies as male in the written word. Why not respect His pronouns?
Although it’s agreed that God transcends gender limits and God is pure spirit, as He is the Creator knows how each gender operates and feels. He does choose to identify as a Father, Groom, etc. It’s all throughout Scripture. Just because God the Creator knows how we are created implicitly does not mean we are allowed to add confusion to the order into which He created things.
Last edited:
I did a simple web search on the question of whether God has a gender. Almost all Christian web sites are conservative. They all seem to say that God is male. Like you, I had thought this was a heresy. But it seems to have taken over at least conservative Christianity.
I'm still unclear what that would mean. I HOPE it doesn't mean that men are more directly in God's image than women, though I know some Christians have felt that way in the past.
Upvote
0
- Dec 3, 2006
- 9,751
- 6,641
- 61
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Amen.God identifies as male in the written word. Why not respect His pronouns?
Upvote
0
Tuur
Well-Known Member
- Oct 12, 2022
- 4,281
- 2,027
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit. If we accept that Jesus Christ is God Incarnate and that the Trinity is God, then we have gender right there. I really don't want to sound crass or sacrilegious, but being that Mary is how God the Son came among us, that could be a factor as well. I don't see how we can escape that. Note that this isn't in the Mormon sense about God the Father, but maybe a nod to God the Son and how He came to be with us.God identifies as male in the written word. Why not respect His pronouns?
- Dec 3, 2006
- 9,751
- 6,641
- 61
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
How many times in the Old Testament and the New Testament is the Lord God referred to by using male nouns and male pronouns?
From Google Gemini:
Because the Bible was written over a period of 1,500 years by dozens of authors across multiple original languages, there is no single, universally agreed-upon "exact" number. However, scholars and data analysts who have done complete word counts of the biblical text place the number of masculine nouns and pronouns used for God into the thousands.
An exhaustive count across the entire text easily yields well over 3,000 to 5,000 distinct masculine references, depending on how strictly you define the search parameters.
Here is a breakdown of how those numbers shake out in the original languages and the text.
Passages like Numbers 23:19 state that "God is not a man," and Genesis 1:27 highlights that both male and female are made in the image of God. The Bible also occasionally uses maternal or feminine imagery metaphorically (such as God comforting Israel like a nursing mother in Isaiah 66:13, or Jesus comparing his care to a mother hen in Matthew 23:37).
However, when it comes to direct addresses, titles, grammatical structures, and pronouns, the original biblical texts are consistently and overwhelmingly masculine.
Should We Use Masculine Pronouns for God?
This short video offers a concise theological and linguistic overview of why the Bible employs masculine pronouns for God and explains the historical context behind the original Hebrew and Greek structures.
gemini.google.com
From Google Gemini:
Because the Bible was written over a period of 1,500 years by dozens of authors across multiple original languages, there is no single, universally agreed-upon "exact" number. However, scholars and data analysts who have done complete word counts of the biblical text place the number of masculine nouns and pronouns used for God into the thousands.
An exhaustive count across the entire text easily yields well over 3,000 to 5,000 distinct masculine references, depending on how strictly you define the search parameters.
Here is a breakdown of how those numbers shake out in the original languages and the text.
1. The Old Testament (Hebrew and Aramaic)
Ancient Hebrew is a gendered language—it does not possess a neuter (gender-neutral) pronoun like "it." Every noun, verb, and pronoun must be grammatically masculine or feminine.- The Pronouns: Every single third-person singular pronoun used to refer directly to God in the Old Testament is hu (הוּא), which is the grammatically masculine "He." There are hundreds of these occurrences.
- The Verbs: In Hebrew, verbs are also gendered. Throughout the Old Testament, verbs attached to God always take the masculine form. For example, the very first sentence of Genesis says B'reshit bara Elohim ("In the beginning God created"). The verb bara (created) is strictly the third-person masculine singular form ("He created"). This pattern occurs thousands of times (e.g., "And the Lord said", "He heard", "He remembered").
- The Nouns and Titles: God is consistently identified by masculine titles. The title "Father" (Ab) is used for God about 15 times, while terms like "King" (Melek), "Husband" (Ba'al), and "Master/Lord" (Adonai) appear hundreds of times.
2. The New Testament (Koine Greek)
Unlike Hebrew, Koine Greek does have neuter pronouns and nouns. Yet, the New Testament writers overwhelmingly and intentionally selected masculine grammar when referring to God.- The Nouns: The primary word for God in the New Testament is Theos (θεός), which is a grammatically masculine noun. It appears over 1,300 times in the New Testament. Because pronouns must agree with the nouns they replace, the pronouns tracking back to Theos are masculine.
- The Pronouns: The masculine pronouns autos (he/him/his) and ekeinos (that one/he) are used hundreds of times for God the Father, Jesus Christ, and the Holy Spirit.
- The Title of Father: The absolute dominant masculine identifier in the New Testament is "Father" (Pater). Jesus personally refers to God as Father over 100 times in the Gospels alone, and the Epistles use it dozens more times to establish the relationship between God and believers.
The Theological Context
While the text uses masculine grammar thousands of times, Christian theology and the biblical text itself note that God is a spiritual being who transcends human biological sex.Passages like Numbers 23:19 state that "God is not a man," and Genesis 1:27 highlights that both male and female are made in the image of God. The Bible also occasionally uses maternal or feminine imagery metaphorically (such as God comforting Israel like a nursing mother in Isaiah 66:13, or Jesus comparing his care to a mother hen in Matthew 23:37).
However, when it comes to direct addresses, titles, grammatical structures, and pronouns, the original biblical texts are consistently and overwhelmingly masculine.
Should We Use Masculine Pronouns for God?
This short video offers a concise theological and linguistic overview of why the Bible employs masculine pronouns for God and explains the historical context behind the original Hebrew and Greek structures.
Google Gemini
Meet Gemini, Google’s AI assistant. Get help with writing, planning, brainstorming, and more. Experience the power of generative AI.
gemini.google.com
Upvote
0
ViaCrucis
Confessional Lutheran
- Oct 2, 2011
- 40,427
- 30,189
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Lutheran
- Marital Status
- In Relationship
- Politics
- US-Others
Historically, the Church has always taught that God transcends gender.
Even growing up in conservative Evangelical spaces, nobody ever tried to teach that God was male; but that God--being God--is beyond gender.
So I have no idea what's going on. The things I've been saying in this thread are normative, historic, orthodox Christian teaching. My assumption, therefore, is that this is an example of people trying to force their politics onto God.
I even provided, earlier in this thread, substantive statements from well-respected theologians, including St. Augustine and St. John of Damascus. Apparently the great Doctors of the Church are now too woke for modern American Christians. But it does lend credence to my theory that American Christianity is in the process of becoming apostate. I figure it's just a matter of time that MAGA Christians do away with the Bible, with the Cross, and with Jesus. That is currently implicit, but it seems like it will probably become explicit in time. I don't want to be a pessimist--but what else am I supposed to do with all the evidence?
Last edited:
Upvote
0
ViaCrucis
Confessional Lutheran
- Oct 2, 2011
- 40,427
- 30,189
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Lutheran
- Marital Status
- In Relationship
- Politics
- US-Others
To the dismay of a lot of Trump supporters. Though, to be technical, slavery wasn't abolished in the US, it was mostly abolished. Technically slavery is still legal in the case of incarceration--as per the Constitution itself. But prison reform isn't the topic of this thread.
Upvote
0
- Dec 3, 2006
- 9,751
- 6,641
- 61
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
There are literally thousands of examples in the Bible where male nouns, male pronouns, and male verbs are used in reference to the Lord God. I grew up in Baptist churches and went to Baptist colleges. If you want to believe that God is not male, then you are disagreeing with the Bible.
Also, knowing that God is male has absolutely nothing at all to do with MAGA. The comments you made about MAGA doing away with the Bible, the Cross, and Jesus Christ are nothing more than flaming, goading and false insults.
Upvote
0
Tuur
Well-Known Member
- Oct 12, 2022
- 4,281
- 2,027
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
Wrong on all counts.
1. Supporters of slavery were Democrats, not Republicans.
2. Prisoners in the US are paid for labor and work is treated as a privilege, due to a means of making money. During unrest, prisons have revoked working privileges as punishment (separate from lock-downs). No work during lock-downs is a given. The fun thing is that, per a prison guard I knew who went with the outside work details, I've worked in outside conditions that were deemed as too harsh for prisoners. Nothing quite like working out in weather, then after work hearing said guard say they didn't go out that day because the weather was too bad.
3. No, it's not the topic of this thread.
Tuur
Well-Known Member
- Oct 12, 2022
- 4,281
- 2,027
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
It's most instructive to know what the other side believes. Be that as it may, let's break this down as simply as we can get: Jesus Christ is God the Son.
ViaCrucis
Confessional Lutheran
- Oct 2, 2011
- 40,427
- 30,189
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Lutheran
- Marital Status
- In Relationship
- Politics
- US-Others
Yep, in the 1860's the Democratic Party was very much a pro-slavery party. And the newly formed Republican Party, under Abraham Lincoln, was the party of abolition.
It's almost as though, at some point, in the course of the last 160 years something changed with the two major political parties in the United States. I wonder if there is excellent documentation of that happening, and historians are fully aware of this and have talked about it for decades.
Upvote
0
ViaCrucis
Confessional Lutheran
- Oct 2, 2011
- 40,427
- 30,189
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Lutheran
- Marital Status
- In Relationship
- Politics
- US-Others
Not even the teachers at the Independent Fundamentalist Baptist church I went to school at would have claimed "God is male". It's a fundamental conflation of the Creator-creature distinction. And this has nothing to do with the use of masculine language in reference to God.
The issue isn't whether the Bible uses masculine language for God. Of course it does. Repeating this changes nothing.
The issue is whether God is, in His Essence, "a male". And the answer to that question is categorically no. And no where does the Bible call God a male; on the contrary, Scripture is abundantly clear that God is not like His creation. He is not like human beings, or animals, or anything in all of creation--He is beyond all that He made. The Biblical answer is God is radically and fundamentally Other than all created things.
Upvote
0
- Dec 3, 2006
- 9,751
- 6,641
- 61
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
God in His essence is male. In fact, you don't even refer to Him without using the male pronouns. The Lord God Almighty is male. That is the pure, fundamental, Bible fact.
Upvote
0
- Feb 5, 2002
- 190,137
- 70,357
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
AI:
Yes, within the Christian faith, Jesus was fully human and biologically male.[1]
According to Christian theology:
The belief that Jesus' male identity is eternal is rooted in several foundational teachings: [1]
Yes, within the Christian faith, Jesus was fully human and biologically male.[1]
According to Christian theology:
- God the Father and the Holy Spirit are spirit, meaning God does not have a physical body or a biological sex.
- Jesus (God the Son) chose to enter the world as an incarnate human, taking on a male physical body.
- Being the "second Adam," Jesus came as a man to represent humanity. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]
- Detail the historical and cultural significance of Jesus being a man in first-century Judea.
- Discuss what early Christian scholars wrote about gender and the Divine.
- Explain how both men and women are viewed as being made in the image of God. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
The belief that Jesus' male identity is eternal is rooted in several foundational teachings: [1]
- The Eternal God-Man: Christian theology teaches that Jesus did not just "borrow" a human body temporarily; He is forever the God-man. Centuries after His ascension, the Apostle Paul referred to Him in 1 Timothy 2:5 as "the man Christ Jesus". [1, 2, 3]
- The Resurrection Pattern: Following His resurrection, Jesus retained His physical form, ate with His disciples, and allowed them to touch His crucifixion wounds. He was fully recognizable to others as a man. [1, 2, 3, 4]
- Glorified Humanity: Glorification does not mean the erasure of physical traits. Instead, it means the body is perfected, imperishable, and free from decay, weakness, and the effects of sin. [1, 2]
- Feb 5, 2002
- 190,137
- 70,357
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
We could all bring the Virgin Mary into this… seems to be a certain order to it.
Tuur
Well-Known Member
- Oct 12, 2022
- 4,281
- 2,027
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
That's the claim, except I saw Segregationists stay with the Democrats. Like Lester Maddox and George Wallace, and I had malicious fun yanking the chain of the old Segregationist Democrats. Rather than go Republican., they tried to strike out as Independent to the point where it gave Independent a bad name. Even as late as the time of Ross Perot's run, saw some of them try to set up another party (not Ross Perot's). It's easier for the Democrats to play the race card when it comes to Republicans rather than confront their own unfortunate history, which isn't as long ago as they might like to think.
But that's not the subject of the topic.
ViaCrucis
Confessional Lutheran
- Oct 2, 2011
- 40,427
- 30,189
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Lutheran
- Marital Status
- In Relationship
- Politics
- US-Others
You're right this isn't the subject. But I am going to ask you something that I want you to think long and hard about.
Who is out there waving the Confederate flag. Do they support Democrats or Republicans? And be honest.
Upvote
0
- Dec 3, 2006
- 9,751
- 6,641
- 61
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Upvote
0
Similar threads
