Plymouth colony, Massachusetts Bay colony, Rhode Island & Providence Plantations, Connecticutt I only have 5 New England Colonies. Are you counting Maine and Halifax? Still not getting to 13 or even close.
But that is on the founding of the *colonies* not of the USA.
Right. And I cannot vouch for all 13, but the original New England core had such statements in their founding documents.
You should consider using periods to break up your thoughts.
Yes, I tend to write long sentences, but smart people (like you) can parse them okay.
1. There was no "Rebellion of 1789". The US Constitution was created in 1787 and ratified in 1788 and it was not a "Rebellion".
Yes it was. It overthrew the existing constitutions of the Colonies and substituted the U.S. Constitution as the new basis for govt. That is what rebellions do.
2. The USA was not "Colonial America" in 1787. The independence of the USA was *recognized* by Great Britain in 1783 with the Treaty of Paris.
Yes, but before 1789, the govt was the colonial govt. It was replaced through the acts in 1789.
3. The rebellion against colonial rule was far from bloodless and was a full-scale war starting in 1775 that effectively ended with British surrender in 1781.
That is not the rebellion I am referring to, but the subsequent one in 1789. The colonies became independent of Britain in 1776. Then a few years later, in 1789, the colonial govt was replaced by the U.S. govt.
4. "J.C." was not running the colonial governments of 1775. The pre-rebellion governments were already fairly democratic and in many colonies suppressed by more direct British control.
The two assertions are not in conflict. The colonial govts recognized the lordship of Christ over the colonies, and their adherence to scripture in civil affairs shows this. George was king in name but the colonists had their own local govts of the states. The Articles of Confederation were their constitution.
5. "We the people" replaces royal sovereignty with the sovereignty of the people. It has nothing to do with religion. It does not make "We the people" into some sort of god.
It has everything to do with "religion" in that it replaced the biblical religion with an Enlightenment religion. Because Enlightenment humanism is different, even antithetic to Christianity, does not put it in a different category. It is an alternative.
6. Jesuits? In a land where the "Catholic colony" (Maryland) wasn't even controlled by Catholics?
Read
Tupper Saussy's book and find out. Jesuits do not proclaim their secret activities to the world. The real question is whether the Freemasons (such as most of the U.S. Founders) are controlled by the Jesuits. That is my working hypothesis, and it appears to be for Saussy too.
As for the masonic conspiracy notions -- SMH. This is bad history straight out of the anti-Catholic, anti-Masonic, nativist politics of the 1830s and 1840s.
Well, that settles that!
Read Saussy and learn more.
Misquoting Isaiah is an old tradition going back to at least Matthew. Think of yourself as being in good company.
You're putting up Panama as a government ideal?
I am stating no more nor less that what I have stated about them. Learn to read.
Sounds like you don't think well of the church 'leaders' organizing and promoting this event.
One can kind of get that impression.