We perhaps have a very simple theological divide to make here: I believe God allowed and even empowered the devils in those conquerors of Israel to come against the devils in the people of Israel. The destroyer(s) aren't what we see on the surface.
Well, first the enemy comes, then conquers, then captures and enslaves. A spiritual message there as well.
It wasn't just and only the people. There's more going on that we don't see when we only see physical historical accounts
The devil and his messengers were in the mix every step of the way.
Death is not going to be refashioned or reassigned to anything but the second death
Well then. You are already segmenting your own systemic analysis. You don't want death and hell refashioned but you want the devil and his messengers refashioned. The case is they are not sentient freewill agents.
Unfortunately for the early church fathers, they leaned heavily on freewill agency and choices. The reformed views on these subjects are an upgrade.
The devils don't have a choice to do better. They were made by God only to resist God, and to steal, kill, destroy, blind and take captive. There is no choice on the table for them to do otherwise. And they were never holy. All of the nonsense holy angels gone sour are concoctions that are not presented in scripture, largely stemming from the error of freewill free agency.
Bingo. We can leave everything going into the LoF right there. I'm fine with permanent termination. Maybe the dust will sizzle for eternity.
Other than the specific exemptions, yes.
The blanket doesn't eliminate the exemption statements. Gotta read the whole contract.
The angels (messengers) were always wicked evil messengers. They never fell from a holy state and that is never stated to be the case.
I think we've already agreed that all people and all of creation is saved in the end, particulars notwithstanding and in my reading, with specified exemptions.
I think part of the issue here is that certain UR preachers still threaten people with the LoF, and say it's only temporary torture. It's just modified extortion.
I don't buy that story
Christ also specified exemptions. Let's not ignore the facts. You know full well these adverse agents are heading for the flames. You think they're heading for redemption. I don't.
Christ's blood was not shed for devils
Well of course
that's exactly what you're promoting.
Uh, no. Origen didn't. That leaves you with 1 errant based freewiller that thought Satan was a freewill agent with choice. I think Satan is nothing more than an antispirit that will have the switch turned off
Look, there is nothing in scripture that even remotely applies any forms of change or redemption to Satan or devils, specifically and lots of the opposite.
I have no problem with it with correct exemptions applied. I read the whole contract hundreds of times. What you think is in the fine print ignores the exemption statements. Satan and devils are not and never will be children of God and Satan isn't Jesus' brother
Largely because the church accused him of teaching Satanic salvation, which he denied.
Not quite. He said it was theoretically possible IF Satan was a freewill agent but that it likely would not happen. Freewill got in his way.
Uh, no, it's not. The EO do not promote Satanic salvation or even people salvation other than their members. All other people may be only iffy in their eyes.
If there were a single line of text that applied eventual salvation to Satan or his totally presumed on your part, derivative, you'd have a point. I've looked. Nothing there. It's a nothing burger
God doesn't feed us nothing burgers. You should give up the practice and stick to God's children.